PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UHAL vs. R
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UHAL vs. R - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) and Ryder System, Inc. (R). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UHAL achieves a 24.52% return, which is significantly lower than R's 38.74% return. Over the past 10 years, UHAL has underperformed R with an annualized return of 5.86%, while R has yielded a comparatively higher 19.29% annualized return.


UHAL

1D
0.63%
1M
21.77%
YTD
24.52%
6M
22.57%
1Y
1.92%
3Y*
5.73%
5Y*
2.28%
10Y*
5.86%

R

1D
-0.64%
1M
7.93%
YTD
38.74%
6M
34.79%
1Y
74.50%
3Y*
50.80%
5Y*
32.13%
10Y*
19.29%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UHAL vs. R - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UHAL
U-Haul Holding Company
24.52%-27.04%-3.77%19.29%-17.05%60.36%21.49%15.01%-12.81%2.94%
R
Ryder System, Inc.
38.74%24.53%39.51%41.61%4.38%37.59%20.15%17.42%-41.03%15.88%

Correlation

The correlation between UHAL and R is 0.42, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.42

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.50

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.54

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.49

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 4, 1994

0.37

The correlation between UHAL and R shifts across timeframes, from 0.37 (all time) to 0.54 (5 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UHAL:

$12.31B

R:

$10.43B

EPS

UHAL:

$0.94

R:

$12.04

PE Ratio

UHAL:

66.73

R:

21.87

PS Ratio

UHAL:

2.04

R:

0.85

PB Ratio

UHAL:

1.59

R:

3.65

Total Revenue (TTM)

UHAL:

$6.04B

R:

$12.66B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UHAL:

$5.79B

R:

$3.29B

EBITDA (TTM)

UHAL:

$1.35B

R:

$2.65B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UHAL vs. R — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UHAL
UHAL Risk / Return Rank: 4242
Overall Rank
UHAL Sharpe Ratio Rank: 4444
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UHAL Sortino Ratio Rank: 3939
Sortino Ratio Rank
UHAL Omega Ratio Rank: 4040
Omega Ratio Rank
UHAL Calmar Ratio Rank: 4343
Calmar Ratio Rank
UHAL Martin Ratio Rank: 4343
Martin Ratio Rank

R
R Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
R Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9191
Sharpe Ratio Rank
R Sortino Ratio Rank: 8686
Sortino Ratio Rank
R Omega Ratio Rank: 8888
Omega Ratio Rank
R Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
R Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UHAL vs. R - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) and Ryder System, Inc. (R). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UHALRDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-2.16

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.34

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.04

1.39

-0.34

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.06

4.28

-4.22

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.12

11.71

-11.59

UHAL vs. R - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UHAL Sharpe Ratio is 0.06, which is lower than the R Sharpe Ratio of 2.22. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UHAL and R, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UHAL vs. R - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UHAL drawdown since its inception was -96.19%, which is greater than R's maximum drawdown of -74.02%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UHAL and R.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UHALRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.19%

-74.02%

-22.17%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-33.92%

-17.52%

-16.40%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-46.19%

-23.86%

-22.33%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-46.19%

-29.97%

-16.22%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-46.19%

-72.26%

+26.07%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-19.94%

-6.06%

-13.88%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.61%

-22.49%

-6.12%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

16.25%

6.38%

+9.87%

Volatility

UHAL vs. R - Volatility Comparison

U-Haul Holding Company (UHAL) has a higher volatility of 14.59% compared to Ryder System, Inc. (R) at 7.66%. This indicates that UHAL's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than R based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UHALRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

14.59%

7.66%

+6.93%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.70%

25.14%

+3.56%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

33.71%

33.79%

-0.08%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

30.35%

33.01%

-2.66%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

29.56%

36.60%

-7.04%

Dividends

UHAL vs. R - Dividend Comparison

UHAL has not paid dividends to shareholders, while R's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.38%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
R
Ryder System, Inc.
1.38%1.80%1.94%2.31%2.87%2.77%3.63%4.05%4.40%2.14%2.28%2.75%
UHAL
U-Haul Holding Company
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%769.35%0.21%0.55%0.40%0.46%0.66%0.54%1.28%

Financials

UHAL vs. R - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between U-Haul Holding Company and Ryder System, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.00B1.50B2.00B2.50B3.00B20222023202420252026
1.27B
3.13B
(UHAL) Total Revenue
(R) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

Frequently Asked Questions


UHAL and R have a correlation of 0.42, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UHAL has higher volatility (14.59%) compared to R (7.66%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UHAL dropped -96.19% vs R's -74.02%.

R currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.22 vs 0.06), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UHAL and R

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer