PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
R vs. AGM
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Correlation

The correlation between R and AGM is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


-0.50.00.51.00.3

Performance

R vs. AGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-20.00%-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
22.81%
-8.16%
R
AGM

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

R:

1.81

AGM:

0.35

Sortino Ratio

R:

2.57

AGM:

0.70

Omega Ratio

R:

1.32

AGM:

1.09

Calmar Ratio

R:

4.43

AGM:

0.59

Martin Ratio

R:

12.13

AGM:

1.22

Ulcer Index

R:

4.23%

AGM:

9.10%

Daily Std Dev

R:

28.37%

AGM:

31.47%

Max Drawdown

R:

-74.02%

AGM:

-94.63%

Current Drawdown

R:

-3.79%

AGM:

-10.47%

Fundamentals

Market Cap

R:

$6.92B

AGM:

$2.03B

EPS

R:

$10.96

AGM:

$15.55

PE Ratio

R:

14.93

AGM:

12.38

PEG Ratio

R:

1.22

AGM:

1.52

Total Revenue (TTM)

R:

$9.46B

AGM:

$514.28M

Gross Profit (TTM)

R:

$1.83B

AGM:

$514.28M

EBITDA (TTM)

R:

$2.05B

AGM:

$584.62M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, R achieves a 4.29% return, which is significantly higher than AGM's -2.26% return. Over the past 10 years, R has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 9.68%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 24.83% annualized return.


R

YTD

4.29%

1M

-0.25%

6M

22.81%

1Y

52.10%

5Y*

28.53%

10Y*

9.68%

AGM

YTD

-2.26%

1M

-8.39%

6M

-8.16%

1Y

10.43%

5Y*

22.75%

10Y*

24.83%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Risk-Adjusted Performance

R vs. AGM — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

R
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of R is 9292
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of R is 9292
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of R is 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of R is 8787
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of R is 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of R is 9494
Martin Ratio Rank

AGM
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of AGM is 6161
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of AGM is 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of AGM is 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of AGM is 5454
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of AGM is 7373
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of AGM is 6363
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

R vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for R, currently valued at 1.81, compared to the broader market-2.000.002.001.810.35
The chart of Sortino ratio for R, currently valued at 2.57, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.570.70
The chart of Omega ratio for R, currently valued at 1.32, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.321.09
The chart of Calmar ratio for R, currently valued at 4.43, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.430.59
The chart of Martin ratio for R, currently valued at 12.13, compared to the broader market-30.00-20.00-10.000.0010.0020.0012.131.22
R
AGM

The current R Sharpe Ratio is 1.81, which is higher than the AGM Sharpe Ratio of 0.35. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of R and AGM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.502.002.50AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
1.81
0.35
R
AGM

Dividends

R vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison

R's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.86%, less than AGM's 2.91% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
R
Ryder System, Inc.
1.86%1.94%2.31%2.87%2.77%3.63%4.05%4.40%2.14%2.28%2.75%1.53%
AGM
Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation
2.91%2.84%2.30%3.37%2.84%4.31%3.35%3.84%1.84%1.82%2.03%1.85%

Drawdowns

R vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum R drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R and AGM. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-20.00%-15.00%-10.00%-5.00%0.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
-3.79%
-10.47%
R
AGM

Volatility

R vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Ryder System, Inc. (R) is 6.93%, while Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) has a volatility of 7.75%. This indicates that R experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%14.00%AugustSeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025
6.93%
7.75%
R
AGM

Financials

R vs. AGM - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ryder System, Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab