R vs. AGM

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM).

Performance

R vs. AGM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

R vs. AGM - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
R Ryder System, Inc.	8.55%	24.53%	39.51%	41.61%	4.38%	37.59%	20.15%	17.42%	-41.03%	15.88%
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation	-14.44%	-7.96%	6.08%	74.61%	-5.83%	72.62%	-6.60%	43.16%	-20.38%	39.64%

Fundamentals

EPS R : $12.02 AGM : $24.96
PE Ratio R : 17.21 AGM : 5.96
PEG Ratio R : 1.21 AGM : 0.44
PS Ratio R : 0.68 AGM : 0.67
Total Revenue (TTM) R : $12.67B AGM : $1.61B
Gross Profit (TTM) R : $3.30B AGM : $0.00
EBITDA (TTM) R : $2.45B AGM : $0.00

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, R achieves a 8.55% return, which is significantly higher than AGM's -14.44% return. Over the past 10 years, R has underperformed AGM with an annualized return of 15.89%, while AGM has yielded a comparatively higher 18.55% annualized return.

R

• 1D: 1.05%
• 1M: -6.58%
• YTD: 8.55%
• 6M: 9.95%
• 1Y: 44.26%
• 3Y*: 35.45%
• 5Y*: 25.01%
• 10Y*: 15.89%

AGM

• 1D: 0.20%
• 1M: -5.77%
• YTD: -14.44%
• 6M: -7.85%
• 1Y: -17.57%
• 3Y*: 6.96%
• 5Y*: 11.41%
• 10Y*: 18.55%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

R vs. AGM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

R

R Risk / Return Rank: 78
R Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
R Sortino Ratio Rank: 73
R Omega Ratio Rank: 74
R Calmar Ratio Rank: 82
R Martin Ratio Rank: 82

AGM

AGM Risk / Return Rank: 19
AGM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 17
AGM Sortino Ratio Rank: 18
AGM Omega Ratio Rank: 17
AGM Calmar Ratio Rank: 22
AGM Martin Ratio Rank: 19

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

R vs. AGM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	R	AGM	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.25	-0.54	+1.78
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.78	-0.53	+2.31
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	0.93	+0.32
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.67	-0.56	+3.23
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	6.86	-1.14	+8.00
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

R vs. AGM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current R Sharpe Ratio is 1.25, which is higher than the AGM Sharpe Ratio of -0.54. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of R and AGM, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	R	AGM	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.25	-0.54	+1.78
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	0.38	+0.38
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.44	0.54	-0.10
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.31	-0.02

Correlation

The correlation between R and AGM is 0.32, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Dividends

R vs. AGM - Dividend Comparison

R's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.71%, less than AGM's 4.10% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
R Ryder System, Inc.	1.71%	1.80%	1.94%	2.31%	2.87%	2.77%	3.63%	4.05%	4.40%	2.14%	2.28%	2.75%
AGM Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation	4.10%	3.42%	2.84%	2.30%	3.37%	2.84%	4.31%	3.35%	3.84%	1.84%	1.82%	2.03%

Drawdowns

R vs. AGM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum R drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, smaller than the maximum AGM drawdown of -94.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R and AGM.

Drawdown Indicators

	R	AGM	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.02%	-94.63%	+20.61%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.52%	-31.94%	+14.42%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.97%	-32.54%	+2.57%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.26%	-53.30%	-18.96%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-7.68%	-27.86%	+20.18%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.58%	-27.93%	+5.35%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.81%	15.67%	-8.86%

Volatility

R vs. AGM - Volatility Comparison

Ryder System, Inc. (R) has a higher volatility of 11.22% compared to Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation (AGM) at 8.45%. This indicates that R's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than AGM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	R	AGM	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.22%	8.45%	+2.77%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.32%	24.80%	+1.52%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.74%	32.94%	+2.80%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.87%	30.03%	+2.84%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.52%	34.64%	+1.88%

Financials

R vs. AGM - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ryder System, Inc. and Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

R - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.39B and revenue of 3.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.

AGM - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a gross profit of -284.04M and revenue of 401.81M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was -70.7%.

R - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported an operating income of -307.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in an operating margin of -9.7%.

AGM - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported an operating income of -195.25M and revenue of 401.81M, resulting in an operating margin of -48.6%.

R - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported a net income of 133.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

AGM - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Federal Agricultural Mortgage Corporation reported a net income of 23.00M and revenue of 401.81M, resulting in a net margin of 5.7%.