PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
R vs. ET
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility
Financials

Performance

R vs. ET - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-10.00%0.00%10.00%20.00%30.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
28.69%
13.28%
R
ET

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, R achieves a 43.14% return, which is significantly higher than ET's 38.09% return. Over the past 10 years, R has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 9.08%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 2.23% annualized return.


R

YTD

43.14%

1M

8.50%

6M

28.69%

1Y

54.82%

5Y (annualized)

30.63%

10Y (annualized)

9.08%

ET

YTD

38.09%

1M

9.15%

6M

13.28%

1Y

40.95%

5Y (annualized)

19.66%

10Y (annualized)

2.23%

Fundamentals


RET
Market Cap$6.95B$60.19B
EPS$10.67$1.36
PE Ratio15.3912.93
PEG Ratio1.220.61
Total Revenue (TTM)$12.49B$83.66B
Gross Profit (TTM)$2.42B$14.03B
EBITDA (TTM)$2.74B$14.83B

Key characteristics


RET
Sharpe Ratio2.072.82
Sortino Ratio2.893.99
Omega Ratio1.361.51
Calmar Ratio4.991.96
Martin Ratio14.6723.30
Ulcer Index3.94%1.91%
Daily Std Dev27.94%15.63%
Max Drawdown-74.02%-87.81%
Current Drawdown-3.58%0.00%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Correlation

-0.50.00.51.00.4

The correlation between R and ET is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.

Risk-Adjusted Performance

R vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for R, currently valued at 2.07, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.072.82
The chart of Sortino ratio for R, currently valued at 2.89, compared to the broader market-4.00-2.000.002.004.002.893.99
The chart of Omega ratio for R, currently valued at 1.36, compared to the broader market0.501.001.502.001.361.51
The chart of Calmar ratio for R, currently valued at 4.99, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.004.991.96
The chart of Martin ratio for R, currently valued at 14.67, compared to the broader market-10.000.0010.0020.0030.0014.6723.30
R
ET

The current R Sharpe Ratio is 2.07, which is comparable to the ET Sharpe Ratio of 2.82. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of R and ET, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio1.001.502.002.503.00JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
2.07
2.82
R
ET

Dividends

R vs. ET - Dividend Comparison

R's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.89%, less than ET's 7.26% yield.


TTM20232022202120202019201820172016201520142013
R
Ryder System, Inc.
1.89%2.31%2.87%2.77%3.63%4.05%4.40%2.14%2.28%2.75%1.53%1.76%
ET
Energy Transfer LP
7.26%8.96%7.33%7.44%17.28%9.51%9.24%6.66%5.90%7.42%2.61%3.19%

Drawdowns

R vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum R drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
-3.58%
0
R
ET

Volatility

R vs. ET - Volatility Comparison

Ryder System, Inc. (R) has a higher volatility of 10.54% compared to Energy Transfer LP (ET) at 4.39%. This indicates that R's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


2.00%4.00%6.00%8.00%10.00%12.00%JuneJulyAugustSeptemberOctoberNovember
10.54%
4.39%
R
ET

Financials

R vs. ET - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ryder System, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


Values in USD except per share items