R vs. ET
Compare and contrast key facts about Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Energy Transfer LP (ET).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: R or ET.
Correlation
The correlation between R and ET is 0.36, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Performance
R vs. ET - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
R:
1.37
ET:
2.87
R:
2.08
ET:
4.02
R:
1.25
ET:
1.51
R:
3.33
ET:
2.45
R:
9.38
ET:
22.37
R:
4.12%
ET:
2.19%
R:
28.16%
ET:
17.09%
R:
-74.02%
ET:
-87.81%
R:
-8.45%
ET:
-5.04%
Fundamentals
R:
$6.85B
ET:
$63.82B
R:
$10.68
ET:
$1.36
R:
15.16
ET:
13.71
R:
1.22
ET:
0.66
R:
$12.49B
ET:
$83.66B
R:
$2.42B
ET:
$12.71B
R:
$1.33B
ET:
$14.83B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, R achieves a 38.45% return, which is significantly lower than ET's 48.15% return. Over the past 10 years, R has outperformed ET with an annualized return of 8.51%, while ET has yielded a comparatively lower 4.12% annualized return.
R
38.45%
-2.64%
30.05%
35.84%
27.92%
8.51%
ET
48.15%
3.17%
24.70%
48.25%
17.97%
4.12%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
R vs. ET - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Energy Transfer LP (ET). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
R vs. ET - Dividend Comparison
R's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.95%, less than ET's 6.77% yield.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
R Ryder System, Inc. | 1.95% | 2.31% | 2.87% | 2.77% | 3.63% | 4.05% | 4.40% | 2.14% | 2.28% | 2.75% | 1.53% | 1.76% |
ET Energy Transfer LP | 6.77% | 8.96% | 7.33% | 7.44% | 17.28% | 9.51% | 9.24% | 6.66% | 5.90% | 7.42% | 2.61% | 3.19% |
Drawdowns
R vs. ET - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum R drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, smaller than the maximum ET drawdown of -87.81%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R and ET. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
R vs. ET - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Ryder System, Inc. (R) is 6.40%, while Energy Transfer LP (ET) has a volatility of 8.02%. This indicates that R experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ET based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
R vs. ET - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Ryder System, Inc. and Energy Transfer LP. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities