R vs. PWR

Last updated Apr 1, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR).

Performance

R vs. PWR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

R vs. PWR - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
R Ryder System, Inc.	7.42%	24.53%	39.51%	41.61%	4.38%	37.59%	20.15%	17.42%	-41.03%	15.88%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	30.11%	33.70%	46.60%	51.70%	24.63%	59.50%	77.74%	35.84%	-22.93%	12.22%

Fundamentals

Market Cap R : $8.35B PWR : $83.28B
EPS R : $12.02 PWR : $6.79
PE Ratio R : 17.03 PWR : 80.81
PEG Ratio R : 1.20 PWR : 4.00
PS Ratio R : 0.67 PWR : 2.93
Total Revenue (TTM) R : $12.67B PWR : $28.35B
Gross Profit (TTM) R : $3.30B PWR : $3.69B
EBITDA (TTM) R : $2.45B PWR : $2.61B

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, R achieves a 7.42% return, which is significantly lower than PWR's 30.11% return. Over the past 10 years, R has underperformed PWR with an annualized return of 15.76%, while PWR has yielded a comparatively higher 37.93% annualized return.

R

• 1D: 4.01%
• 1M: -7.61%
• YTD: 7.42%
• 6M: 9.57%
• 1Y: 45.20%
• 3Y*: 34.98%
• 5Y*: 24.75%
• 10Y*: 15.76%

PWR

• 1D: 2.86%
• 1M: -2.50%
• YTD: 30.11%
• 6M: 32.55%
• 1Y: 116.24%
• 3Y*: 49.01%
• 5Y*: 44.09%
• 10Y*: 37.93%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

R vs. PWR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

R

R Risk / Return Rank: 80
R Sharpe Ratio Rank: 81
R Sortino Ratio Rank: 75
R Omega Ratio Rank: 76
R Calmar Ratio Rank: 84
R Martin Ratio Rank: 84

PWR

PWR Risk / Return Rank: 97
PWR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 98
PWR Sortino Ratio Rank: 96
PWR Omega Ratio Rank: 95
PWR Calmar Ratio Rank: 99
PWR Martin Ratio Rank: 98

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

R vs. PWR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Ryder System, Inc. (R) and Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	R	PWR	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	1.27	3.29	-2.02
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	1.81	3.82	-2.02
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.25	1.52	-0.26
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.78	9.96	-7.18
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	7.15	24.49	-17.34
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

R vs. PWR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current R Sharpe Ratio is 1.27, which is lower than the PWR Sharpe Ratio of 3.29. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of R and PWR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	R	PWR	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.27	3.29	-2.02
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.76	1.28	-0.52
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.43	1.15	-0.71
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.29	0.33	-0.04

Correlation

The correlation between R and PWR is 0.42, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

R vs. PWR - Dividend Comparison

R's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.73%, more than PWR's 0.07% yield.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
R Ryder System, Inc.	1.73%	1.80%	1.94%	2.31%	2.87%	2.77%	3.63%	4.05%	4.40%	2.14%	2.28%	2.75%
PWR Quanta Services, Inc.	0.07%	0.09%	0.09%	0.15%	0.25%	0.16%	0.29%	0.42%	0.13%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Drawdowns

R vs. PWR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum R drawdown since its inception was -74.02%, smaller than the maximum PWR drawdown of -97.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for R and PWR.

Drawdown Indicators

	R	PWR	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-74.02%	-97.07%	+23.05%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-17.52%	-11.66%	-5.86%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-29.97%	-33.89%	+3.92%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-72.26%	-45.53%	-26.73%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-8.64%	-5.09%	-3.55%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-22.58%	-47.15%	+24.57%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	6.80%	4.74%	+2.06%

Volatility

R vs. PWR - Volatility Comparison

Ryder System, Inc. (R) has a higher volatility of 11.74% compared to Quanta Services, Inc. (PWR) at 11.17%. This indicates that R's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than PWR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	R	PWR	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.74%	11.17%	+0.57%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	26.31%	26.43%	-0.12%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	35.79%	35.55%	+0.24%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	32.88%	34.66%	-1.78%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	36.53%	33.20%	+3.33%

Financials

R vs. PWR - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Ryder System, Inc. and Quanta Services, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

R - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported a gross profit of 1.39B and revenue of 3.18B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 43.8%.

PWR - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a gross profit of 985.00M and revenue of 7.84B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 12.6%.

R - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported an operating income of -307.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in an operating margin of -9.7%.

PWR - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported an operating income of 485.00M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in an operating margin of 6.2%.

R - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Ryder System, Inc. reported a net income of 133.00M and revenue of 3.18B, resulting in a net margin of 4.2%.

PWR - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Quanta Services, Inc. reported a net income of 315.50M and revenue of 7.84B, resulting in a net margin of 4.0%.