PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGOFX vs. MBXIX
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UGOFX vs. MBXIX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund (UGOFX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGOFX achieves a 13.74% return, which is significantly higher than MBXIX's 12.91% return. Over the past 10 years, UGOFX has outperformed MBXIX with an annualized return of 10.45%, while MBXIX has yielded a comparatively lower 7.68% annualized return.


UGOFX

1D
1.67%
1M
0.91%
6M
10.04%
YTD
13.74%
1Y
23.35%
3Y*
16.25%
5Y*
9.93%
10Y*
10.45%
ALL TIME*
6.95%

MBXIX

1D
-0.28%
1M
-2.01%
6M
8.54%
YTD
12.91%
1Y
17.43%
3Y*
10.12%
5Y*
7.38%
10Y*
7.68%
ALL TIME*
8.94%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$0.00$0.00$0.00
$0.00$0.00$0.00

UGOFX vs. MBXIX - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UGOFX
USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund
13.74%16.72%13.34%19.81%-15.68%21.22%6.44%21.97%-8.64%21.26%
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
12.91%4.35%13.49%-0.67%7.72%16.89%-0.45%13.83%-2.16%13.99%

Correlation

The correlation between UGOFX and MBXIX is 0.38, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

0.38

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.35

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.38

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.54

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 28, 2015

0.54

The correlation between UGOFX and MBXIX shifts across timeframes, from 0.35 (3 years) to 0.54 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGOFX vs. MBXIX — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UGOFX
UGOFX Risk / Return Rank: 7373
Overall Rank
UGOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 6767
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 6666
Omega Ratio Rank
UGOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 8080
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 8686
Martin Ratio Rank

MBXIX
MBXIX Risk / Return Rank: 9090
Overall Rank
MBXIX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
MBXIX Sortino Ratio Rank: 8787
Sortino Ratio Rank
MBXIX Omega Ratio Rank: 8484
Omega Ratio Rank
MBXIX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9494
Calmar Ratio Rank
MBXIX Martin Ratio Rank: 9595
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UGOFX vs. MBXIX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund (UGOFX) and Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UGOFXMBXIXDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.48

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.81

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.30

1.40

-0.10

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

2.70

3.88

-1.17

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

11.20

14.92

-3.72

UGOFX vs. MBXIX - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGOFX Sharpe Ratio is 1.68, which is comparable to the MBXIX Sharpe Ratio of 2.16. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGOFX and MBXIX, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UGOFX vs. MBXIX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGOFX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, which is greater than MBXIX's maximum drawdown of -31.73%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGOFX and MBXIX.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGOFXMBXIXDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-38.00%

-31.73%

-6.27%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-7.95%

-3.85%

-4.10%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-14.22%

-15.59%

+1.37%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.00%

-15.59%

-22.41%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-38.00%

-31.73%

-6.27%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-0.73%

-2.68%

+1.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-7.32%

-3.95%

-3.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.92%

1.04%

+0.88%

Volatility

UGOFX vs. MBXIX - Volatility Comparison

USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund (UGOFX) has a higher volatility of 3.78% compared to Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I (MBXIX) at 1.59%. This indicates that UGOFX's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than MBXIX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGOFXMBXIXDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

3.78%

1.59%

+2.19%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

10.86%

4.89%

+5.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

12.81%

6.90%

+5.91%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

20.29%

11.40%

+8.89%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

18.33%

13.36%

+4.97%

UGOFX vs. MBXIX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UGOFX has a 0.70% expense ratio, which is lower than MBXIX's 2.04% expense ratio.


Dividends

UGOFX vs. MBXIX - Dividend Comparison

UGOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.80%, while MBXIX has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
MBXIX
Catalyst/Millburn Hedge Strategy Fund Class I
0.00%0.00%2.63%2.25%7.74%0.00%4.27%5.18%3.33%3.33%1.91%0.00%
UGOFX
USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund
17.80%20.24%3.46%1.77%8.60%24.98%4.13%4.16%4.48%1.99%1.44%1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions


UGOFX and MBXIX have a correlation of 0.38, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGOFX has higher volatility (3.78%) compared to MBXIX (1.59%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGOFX dropped -38.00% vs MBXIX's -31.73%.

MBXIX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.16 vs 1.68), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGOFX and MBXIX

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer