UGOFX vs. GLE

Last updated Jun 6, 2026

UGOFX (USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund) is Global Equities fund managed by BlackRock, while GLE (Global Engine Group Holding Ltd) is a stock. Over the past year, UGOFX returned 24.19% vs -80.24% for GLE. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.

Performance

UGOFX vs. GLE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund (UGOFX) and Global Engine Group Holding Ltd (GLE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGOFX achieves a 13.64% return, which is significantly lower than GLE's 15.71% return.

UGOFX

• 1D: 0.58%
• 1M: 3.31%
• YTD: 13.64%
• 6M: 14.02%
• 1Y: 24.19%
• 3Y*: 18.43%
• 5Y*: 10.46%
• 10Y*: 10.64%

GLE

• 1D: -10.00%
• 1M: 12.19%
• YTD: 15.71%
• 6M: -9.76%
• 1Y: -80.24%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UGOFX vs. GLE - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UGOFX USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund	13.64%	16.72%	-1.38%
GLE Global Engine Group Holding Ltd	15.71%	-79.77%	-58.61%

Correlation

The correlation between UGOFX and GLE is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 23, 2024	0.09

Return for Risk

UGOFX vs. GLE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UGOFX

UGOFX Risk / Return Rank: 60
UGOFX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 55
UGOFX Sortino Ratio Rank: 54
UGOFX Omega Ratio Rank: 53
UGOFX Calmar Ratio Rank: 68
UGOFX Martin Ratio Rank: 71

GLE

GLE Risk / Return Rank: 20
GLE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 20
GLE Sortino Ratio Rank: 25
GLE Omega Ratio Rank: 25
GLE Calmar Ratio Rank: 8
GLE Martin Ratio Rank: 21

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UGOFX vs. GLE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund (UGOFX) and Global Engine Group Holding Ltd (GLE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UGOFX	GLE	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.12	-0.50	+2.62
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.99	-0.25	+3.24
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.38	0.97	+0.42
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.06	-0.87	+3.92
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	13.06	-1.01	+14.07
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UGOFX vs. GLE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGOFX Sharpe Ratio is 2.12, which is higher than the GLE Sharpe Ratio of -0.50. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGOFX and GLE, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UGOFX	GLE	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	2.12	-0.50	+2.62
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	0.52	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	0.58	—	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.43	-0.50	+0.94

Drawdowns

UGOFX vs. GLE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGOFX drawdown since its inception was -38.00%, smaller than the maximum GLE drawdown of -94.99%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGOFX and GLE.

Drawdown Indicators

	UGOFX	GLE	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-38.00%	-94.99%	+56.99%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-7.95%	-92.77%	+84.82%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-14.22%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-38.00%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-38.00%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-0.25%	-92.20%	+91.95%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-7.38%	-70.35%	+62.97%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	1.86%	79.49%	-77.63%

Volatility

UGOFX vs. GLE - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund (UGOFX) is 3.65%, while Global Engine Group Holding Ltd (GLE) has a volatility of 66.84%. This indicates that UGOFX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GLE based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UGOFX	GLE	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	3.65%	66.84%	-63.19%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	9.35%	92.84%	-83.49%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	11.49%	159.60%	-148.11%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	20.14%	148.35%	-128.21%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	18.36%	148.35%	-129.99%

Dividends

UGOFX vs. GLE - Dividend Comparison

UGOFX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 17.81%, while GLE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
GLE Global Engine Group Holding Ltd	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UGOFX USAA Global Managed Volatility Fund	17.81%	20.24%	3.46%	1.77%	8.60%	24.98%	4.13%	4.16%	4.48%	1.99%	1.44%	1.05%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UGOFX and GLE in my portfolio?

UGOFX and GLE have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UGOFX or GLE?

GLE has higher volatility (66.84%) compared to UGOFX (3.65%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGOFX dropped -38.00% vs GLE's -94.99%.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

UGOFX currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.12 vs -0.50), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.