UGLD vs. TMF
UGLD (Direxion Daily Gold Bull 2X ETF) and TMF (Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UGLD is a Leveraged Commodities fund actively managed by Direxion, while TMF is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the ICE U.S. Treasury 20+ Year Bond Index (300%). UGLD is actively managed, while TMF is passively managed. At a 0.14 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UGLD charges 1.07%/yr vs 1.01%/yr for TMF.
Performance
UGLD vs. TMF - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UGLD
- 1D
- -2.66%
- 1M
- -23.12%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
TMF
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 6.27%
- YTD
- 0.10%
- 6M
- -2.84%
- 1Y
- 0.22%
- 3Y*
- -19.40%
- 5Y*
- -30.88%
- 10Y*
- -17.37%
UGLD vs. TMF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UGLD Direxion Daily Gold Bull 2X ETF | -19.30% |
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 7.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGLD and TMF is 0.14, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 28, 2026 | 0.14 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGLD vs. TMF — Risk / Return Rank
UGLD
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
TMF
UGLD vs. TMF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Daily Gold Bull 2X ETF (UGLD) and Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF (TMF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UGLD | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | — | 1.02 | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | — | 0.01 | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | — | 0.02 | — |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UGLD vs. TMF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGLD drawdown since its inception was -24.16%, smaller than the maximum TMF drawdown of -92.89%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGLD and TMF.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGLD | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.16% | -92.89% | +68.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -26.51% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -55.14% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -88.81% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -92.89% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -23.12% | -91.71% | +68.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -12.33% | -43.81% | +31.48% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 12.38% | — |
Volatility
UGLD vs. TMF - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGLD | TMF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 7.11% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 19.60% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 59.10% | 28.04% | +31.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.10% | 46.59% | +12.51% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 59.10% | 43.80% | +15.30% |
UGLD vs. TMF - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGLD has a 1.07% expense ratio, which is higher than TMF's 1.01% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGLD vs. TMF - Dividend Comparison
UGLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.24%, less than TMF's 3.94% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TMF Direxion Daily 20+ Year Treasury Bull 3X ETF | 3.94% | 4.06% | 4.29% | 2.82% | 1.62% | 0.13% | 2.23% | 0.94% | 1.49% | 0.41% |
UGLD Direxion Daily Gold Bull 2X ETF | 0.24% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGLD and TMF have a correlation of 0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, TMF is cheaper at 1.01% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
TMF is cheaper with a 1.01% expense ratio, compared with 1.07% for UGLD.
TMF has the higher dividend yield at 3.94%, compared with 0.24% for UGLD.
UGLD is categorized as Leveraged Commodities, while TMF is Leveraged Bonds. Their fees differ too: 1.07% for UGLD and 1.01% for TMF.
Find the right allocation for UGLD and TMF
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer