PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UGE vs. UWM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UGE vs. UWM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UGE achieves a 17.97% return, which is significantly lower than UWM's 43.57% return. Over the past 10 years, UGE has underperformed UWM with an annualized return of 8.02%, while UWM has yielded a comparatively higher 11.89% annualized return.


UGE

1D
1.09%
1M
0.41%
6M
-2.98%
YTD
17.97%
1Y
9.97%
3Y*
6.30%
5Y*
-2.42%
10Y*
8.02%
ALL TIME*
11.27%

UWM

1D
3.65%
1M
2.05%
6M
26.76%
YTD
43.57%
1Y
75.91%
3Y*
23.55%
5Y*
4.52%
10Y*
11.89%
ALL TIME*
7.52%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$1.04M$851.07K$1.08M
$16.99M$17.34M$19.60M

UGE vs. UWM - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
17.97%-5.21%16.40%2.38%-46.78%42.44%56.64%58.28%-30.14%32.38%
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
43.57%13.59%11.32%22.62%-43.69%23.91%16.57%48.62%-25.89%26.92%

Correlation

The correlation between UGE and UWM is -0.03, meaning there was essentially no consistent relationship between their historical price movements. Each responded to its own set of market drivers.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.03

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.20

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.45

Correlation (10Y)
Provides a long-term view across more market conditions.

0.52

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 1, 2007

0.57

The correlation between UGE and UWM shifts across timeframes, from -0.03 (1 year) to 0.57 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UGE vs. UWM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UGE
UWM

Consumer Defensive

98.1%
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

1.9%
5.1%

Basic Materials

-

2.6%

Communication Services

-

0.9%

Energy

-

3.4%

Financial Services

-

41.4%

Healthcare

-

11.1%

Industrials

-

7.6%

Real Estate

-

4.0%

Technology

-

7.8%

Utilities

-

1.8%

Consumer Defensive

UGE
98.1%
UWM
1.6%

Consumer Cyclical

UGE
1.9%
UWM
5.1%

Basic Materials

UGE

-

UWM
2.6%

Communication Services

UGE

-

UWM
0.9%

Energy

UGE

-

UWM
3.4%

Financial Services

UGE

-

UWM
41.4%

Healthcare

UGE

-

UWM
11.1%

Industrials

UGE

-

UWM
7.6%

Real Estate

UGE

-

UWM
4.0%

Technology

UGE

-

UWM
7.8%

Utilities

UGE

-

UWM
1.8%

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UGE vs. UWM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UGE
UGE Risk / Return Rank: 1818
Overall Rank
UGE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1717
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UGE Sortino Ratio Rank: 1818
Sortino Ratio Rank
UGE Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
UGE Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
UGE Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank

UWM
UWM Risk / Return Rank: 7575
Overall Rank
UWM Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7878
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UWM Sortino Ratio Rank: 7171
Sortino Ratio Rank
UWM Omega Ratio Rank: 6464
Omega Ratio Rank
UWM Calmar Ratio Rank: 8383
Calmar Ratio Rank
UWM Martin Ratio Rank: 8080
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UGE vs. UWM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) and ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UGEUWMDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.90

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.08

1.31

-0.23

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.53

3.42

-2.90

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.86

11.69

-10.83

UGE vs. UWM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UGE Sharpe Ratio is 0.35, which is lower than the UWM Sharpe Ratio of 2.00. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UGE and UWM, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UGE vs. UWM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UGE drawdown since its inception was -71.36%, smaller than the maximum UWM drawdown of -88.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGE and UWM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UGEUWMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-71.36%

-88.21%

+16.85%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-18.95%

-22.28%

+3.33%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-22.81%

-49.79%

+26.98%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-56.55%

-61.62%

+5.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-57.14%

-71.46%

+14.32%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-33.35%

0.00%

-33.35%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-18.86%

-30.64%

+11.78%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.59%

6.51%

+5.08%

Volatility

UGE vs. UWM - Volatility Comparison

ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods (UGE) has a higher volatility of 11.70% compared to ProShares Ultra Russell2000 (UWM) at 8.97%. This indicates that UGE's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than UWM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UGEUWMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.70%

8.97%

+2.73%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

23.05%

28.12%

-5.07%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

28.29%

38.43%

-10.14%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

31.87%

44.96%

-13.09%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

33.26%

46.04%

-12.78%

UGE vs. UWM - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UGE and UWM have an expense ratio of 0.95%.


Dividends

UGE vs. UWM - Dividend Comparison

UGE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.07%, more than UWM's 0.78% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
UGE
ProShares Ultra Consumer Goods
2.07%2.54%1.43%1.20%0.74%0.20%0.41%0.86%0.76%0.68%0.76%0.60%
UWM
ProShares Ultra Russell2000
0.78%1.05%1.16%0.34%0.40%0.00%0.07%0.55%0.41%0.11%0.27%0.23%

Frequently Asked Questions


UGE and UWM have a correlation of -0.03, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UGE has higher volatility (11.70%) compared to UWM (8.97%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGE dropped -71.36% vs UWM's -88.21%.

On 10-year performance, UWM leads with 11.89% vs 8.02% for UGE. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, UWM has been the lower-risk option at 8.97%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UWM has performed better with a 11.89% return vs 8.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

UGE and UWM have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.

UGE has the higher dividend yield at 2.07%, compared with 0.78% for UWM.

UGE tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Goods Index (200%), while UWM tracks Russell 2000 Index (200%).

UWM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.00 vs 0.35), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UGE and UWM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer