UGA vs. VGT
UGA (United States Gasoline Fund LP) and VGT (Vanguard Information Technology ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UGA is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Unleaded Gasoline, while VGT is a Technology Equities fund tracking the MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UGA returned 18.03%/yr vs 24.06%/yr for VGT. Their 0.21 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. UGA charges 0.75%/yr vs 0.09%/yr for VGT.
Performance
UGA vs. VGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UGA achieves a 91.06% return, which is significantly higher than VGT's 20.36% return. Over the past 10 years, UGA has underperformed VGT with an annualized return of 18.03%, while VGT has yielded a comparatively higher 24.06% annualized return.
UGA
- 1D
- -0.01%
- 1M
- 14.56%
- 6M
- 70.02%
- YTD
- 91.06%
- 1Y
- 88.12%
- 3Y*
- 17.55%
- 5Y*
- 25.78%
- 10Y*
- 18.03%
- ALL TIME*
- 4.82%
VGT
- 1D
- -0.38%
- 1M
- -1.30%
- 6M
- 21.30%
- YTD
- 20.36%
- 1Y
- 34.81%
- 3Y*
- 26.48%
- 5Y*
- 17.81%
- 10Y*
- 24.06%
- ALL TIME*
- 14.84%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $6.47M | $5.01M | $4.85M | |
| $440.89M | $515.41M | $573.34M |
UGA vs. VGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 91.06% | -2.00% | 3.77% | 1.27% | 46.34% | 68.49% | -24.88% | 41.25% | -28.07% | 1.69% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 20.36% | 21.77% | 29.30% | 52.66% | -29.70% | 30.45% | 46.04% | 48.62% | 2.46% | 37.08% |
Correlation
The correlation between UGA and VGT is -0.13, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | -0.13 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | -0.02 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.05 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.13 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Feb 28, 2008 | 0.21 |
The correlation between UGA and VGT shifts across timeframes, from -0.13 (1 year) to 0.21 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UGA vs. VGT — Risk / Return Rank
UGA
VGT
UGA vs. VGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) and Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UGA | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +1.01 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.99 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.37 | 1.23 | +0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 4.12 | 1.94 | +2.18 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 11.57 | 5.23 | +6.34 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UGA vs. VGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UGA drawdown since its inception was -86.59%, which is greater than VGT's maximum drawdown of -54.63%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UGA and VGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UGA | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -86.59% | -54.63% | -31.96% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.32% | -16.40% | -3.92% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -26.68% | -27.23% | +0.55% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -38.11% | -35.07% | -3.04% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -75.89% | -35.07% | -40.82% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.63% | -9.93% | +4.30% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -36.53% | -7.95% | -28.58% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.26% | 6.07% | +1.19% |
Volatility
UGA vs. VGT - Volatility Comparison
United States Gasoline Fund LP (UGA) has a higher volatility of 11.28% compared to Vanguard Information Technology ETF (VGT) at 8.42%. This indicates that UGA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UGA | VGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 11.28% | 8.42% | +2.86% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 31.98% | 20.14% | +11.84% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 36.11% | 24.28% | +11.83% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 34.60% | 25.83% | +8.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 37.26% | 24.89% | +12.37% |
UGA vs. VGT - Expense Ratio Comparison
UGA has a 0.75% expense ratio, which is higher than VGT's 0.09% expense ratio.
Dividends
UGA vs. VGT - Dividend Comparison
UGA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VGT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.38%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UGA United States Gasoline Fund LP | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VGT Vanguard Information Technology ETF | 0.38% | 0.40% | 0.60% | 0.65% | 0.91% | 0.64% | 0.82% | 1.11% | 1.29% | 0.99% | 1.31% | 1.28% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UGA and VGT have a correlation of -0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UGA has higher volatility (11.28%) compared to VGT (8.42%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UGA dropped -86.59% vs VGT's -54.63%.
On 10-year performance, VGT leads with 24.06% vs 18.03% for UGA. On fees, VGT is cheaper at 0.09% per year. On volatility, VGT has been the lower-risk option at 8.42%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, VGT has performed better with a 24.06% return vs 18.03%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
VGT is cheaper with a 0.09% expense ratio, compared with 0.75% for UGA.
VGT has the higher dividend yield at 0.38%, compared with 0.00% for UGA.
UGA is categorized as Oil & Gas, while VGT is Technology Equities. UGA tracks Front Month Unleaded Gasoline, while VGT tracks MSCI USA IMI Information Technology 25/50 Index. They also come from different issuers: Concierge Technologies and Vanguard. Their fees differ too: 0.75% for UGA and 0.09% for VGT.
UGA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.32 vs 1.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UGA and VGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer