UFOX vs. DRAM
UFOX (Defiance Connective Technologies ETF) and DRAM (Roundhill Memory ETF) are both Technology Equities funds. UFOX is passively managed, while DRAM is actively managed. At a 0.48 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UFOX charges 0.30%/yr vs 0.65%/yr for DRAM.
Performance
UFOX vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
UFOX
- 1D
- -2.52%
- 1M
- 21.96%
- YTD
- 62.60%
- 6M
- 59.53%
- 1Y
- 119.37%
- 3Y*
- 48.73%
- 5Y*
- 24.01%
- 10Y*
- —
DRAM
- 1D
- 0.20%
- 1M
- 64.14%
- YTD
- —
- 6M
- —
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UFOX vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | |
|---|---|
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 44.56% |
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 151.12% |
Correlation
The correlation between UFOX and DRAM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026 | 0.48 |
UFOX vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UFOX
DRAM
Technology
Industrials
-
Communication Services
-
Real Estate
-
Basic Materials
-
-
Consumer Cyclical
-
-
Consumer Defensive
-
-
Energy
-
-
Financial Services
-
-
Healthcare
-
-
Utilities
-
-
Technology
UFOX
DRAM
Industrials
UFOX
DRAM
-
Communication Services
UFOX
DRAM
-
Real Estate
UFOX
DRAM
-
Basic Materials
UFOX
-
DRAM
-
Consumer Cyclical
UFOX
-
DRAM
-
Consumer Defensive
UFOX
-
DRAM
-
Energy
UFOX
-
DRAM
-
Financial Services
UFOX
-
DRAM
-
Healthcare
UFOX
-
DRAM
-
Utilities
UFOX
-
DRAM
-
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UFOX vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank
UFOX
DRAM
UFOX vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UFOX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 4.69 | — | — |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 5.33 | — | — |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.69 | — | — |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 10.87 | — | — |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 43.09 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UFOX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 4.69 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.98 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.92 | 341.95 | -341.03 |
Drawdowns
UFOX vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UFOX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -10.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFOX and DRAM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UFOX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -33.90% | -10.46% | -23.44% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -11.04% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -28.14% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -33.90% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.52% | 0.00% | -2.52% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.01% | -1.64% | -7.37% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.78% | — | — |
Volatility
UFOX vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UFOX | DRAM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 9.95% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 20.25% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 25.66% | 73.92% | -48.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 24.61% | 73.92% | -49.31% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 25.22% | 73.92% | -48.70% |
UFOX vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UFOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.
Dividends
UFOX vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison
UFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
DRAM Roundhill Memory ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UFOX Defiance Connective Technologies ETF | 0.36% | 0.56% | 0.79% | 1.40% | 1.63% | 1.17% | 0.99% | 0.75% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UFOX and DRAM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UFOX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UFOX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.
UFOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.
They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UFOX and 0.65% for DRAM.
Find the right allocation for UFOX and DRAM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer