PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UFOX vs. DRAM
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UFOX vs. DRAM - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period


UFOX

1D
-2.52%
1M
21.96%
YTD
62.60%
6M
59.53%
1Y
119.37%
3Y*
48.73%
5Y*
24.01%
10Y*

DRAM

1D
0.20%
1M
64.14%
YTD
6M
1Y
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UFOX vs. DRAM - Yearly Performance Comparison


Correlation

The correlation between UFOX and DRAM is 0.48, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 6, 2026

0.48

UFOX vs. DRAM - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UFOX
DRAM

Technology

77.9%
100.0%

Industrials

13.7%

-

Communication Services

5.0%

-

Real Estate

3.3%

-

Basic Materials

-

-

Consumer Cyclical

-

-

Consumer Defensive

-

-

Energy

-

-

Financial Services

-

-

Healthcare

-

-

Utilities

-

-

Technology

UFOX
77.9%
DRAM
100.0%

Industrials

UFOX
13.7%
DRAM

-

Communication Services

UFOX
5.0%
DRAM

-

Real Estate

UFOX
3.3%
DRAM

-

Basic Materials

UFOX

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Cyclical

UFOX

-

DRAM

-

Consumer Defensive

UFOX

-

DRAM

-

Energy

UFOX

-

DRAM

-

Financial Services

UFOX

-

DRAM

-

Healthcare

UFOX

-

DRAM

-

Utilities

UFOX

-

DRAM

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UFOX vs. DRAM — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UFOX
UFOX Risk / Return Rank: 9696
Overall Rank
UFOX Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UFOX Sortino Ratio Rank: 9595
Sortino Ratio Rank
UFOX Omega Ratio Rank: 9494
Omega Ratio Rank
UFOX Calmar Ratio Rank: 9797
Calmar Ratio Rank
UFOX Martin Ratio Rank: 9797
Martin Ratio Rank

DRAM
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UFOX vs. DRAM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Defiance Connective Technologies ETF (UFOX) and Roundhill Memory ETF (DRAM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UFOXDRAMDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

4.69

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

5.33

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.69

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

10.87

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

43.09

UFOX vs. DRAM - Sharpe Ratio Comparison


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UFOXDRAMDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.69

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.98

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.92

341.95

-341.03

Drawdowns

UFOX vs. DRAM - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UFOX drawdown since its inception was -33.90%, which is greater than DRAM's maximum drawdown of -10.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UFOX and DRAM.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UFOXDRAMDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-33.90%

-10.46%

-23.44%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.14%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.52%

0.00%

-2.52%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.01%

-1.64%

-7.37%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

2.78%

Volatility

UFOX vs. DRAM - Volatility Comparison


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UFOXDRAMDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

9.95%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

20.25%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

25.66%

73.92%

-48.26%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.61%

73.92%

-49.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

25.22%

73.92%

-48.70%

UFOX vs. DRAM - Expense Ratio Comparison

UFOX has a 0.30% expense ratio, which is lower than DRAM's 0.65% expense ratio.


Dividends

UFOX vs. DRAM - Dividend Comparison

UFOX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.36%, while DRAM has not paid dividends to shareholders.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019
DRAM
Roundhill Memory ETF
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UFOX
Defiance Connective Technologies ETF
0.36%0.56%0.79%1.40%1.63%1.17%0.99%0.75%

Frequently Asked Questions


UFOX and DRAM have a correlation of 0.48, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UFOX is cheaper at 0.30% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UFOX is cheaper with a 0.30% expense ratio, compared with 0.65% for DRAM.

UFOX has the higher dividend yield at 0.36%, compared with 0.00% for DRAM.

They also come from different issuers: Defiance and Roundhill. Their fees differ too: 0.30% for UFOX and 0.65% for DRAM.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UFOX and DRAM

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer