PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
AVO vs. CCEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

AVO vs. CCEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp (CCEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, AVO achieves a -1.81% return, which is significantly higher than CCEC's -2.77% return.


AVO

1D
-0.87%
1M
-4.45%
YTD
-1.81%
6M
-4.45%
1Y
-9.32%
3Y*
-2.00%
5Y*
-11.87%
10Y*

CCEC

1D
-0.85%
1M
-10.98%
YTD
-2.77%
6M
-5.58%
1Y
-14.78%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

AVO vs. CCEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
AVO
Mission Produce, Inc.
-1.81%-19.28%36.34%
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp
-2.77%17.01%15.33%

Correlation

The correlation between AVO and CCEC is -0.01, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 26, 2024

-0.02

Fundamentals

Market Cap

AVO:

$805.40M

CCEC:

$1.18B

EPS

AVO:

$0.32

CCEC:

$4.01

PE Ratio

AVO:

35.43

CCEC:

4.96

PS Ratio

AVO:

0.65

CCEC:

2.80

Total Revenue (TTM)

AVO:

$1.25B

CCEC:

$418.16M

Gross Profit (TTM)

AVO:

$152.90M

CCEC:

$240.75M

EBITDA (TTM)

AVO:

$83.10M

CCEC:

$338.22M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

AVO vs. CCEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

AVO
AVO Risk / Return Rank: 2929
Overall Rank
AVO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
AVO Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
AVO Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
AVO Calmar Ratio Rank: 3333
Calmar Ratio Rank
AVO Martin Ratio Rank: 2525
Martin Ratio Rank

CCEC
CCEC Risk / Return Rank: 2323
Overall Rank
CCEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2727
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CCEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 2525
Sortino Ratio Rank
CCEC Omega Ratio Rank: 2626
Omega Ratio Rank
CCEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 2323
Calmar Ratio Rank
CCEC Martin Ratio Rank: 1616
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

AVO vs. CCEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp (CCEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


AVOCCECDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.09

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

0.98

0.97

+0.01

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

-0.53

+0.25

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.84

-1.16

+0.32

AVO vs. CCEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current AVO Sharpe Ratio is -0.27, which is comparable to the CCEC Sharpe Ratio of -0.36. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of AVO and CCEC, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

AVO vs. CCEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum AVO drawdown since its inception was -62.71%, which is greater than CCEC's maximum drawdown of -28.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for AVO and CCEC.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


AVOCCECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-62.71%

-28.04%

-34.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-34.09%

-28.04%

-6.05%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-34.09%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-60.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-49.80%

-16.88%

-32.92%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-38.06%

-8.52%

-29.54%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.18%

12.79%

-1.61%

Volatility

AVO vs. CCEC - Volatility Comparison

Mission Produce, Inc. (AVO) and Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp (CCEC) have volatilities of 13.74% and 13.19%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


AVOCCECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.74%

13.19%

+0.55%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

28.88%

29.55%

-0.67%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

34.69%

41.05%

-6.36%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.55%

40.04%

-4.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

36.75%

40.04%

-3.29%

Dividends

AVO vs. CCEC - Dividend Comparison

AVO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while CCEC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.78%.


PositionTTM20252024
AVO
Mission Produce, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%
CCEC
Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp
3.78%2.87%0.82%

Financials

AVO vs. CCEC - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Mission Produce, Inc. and Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M20222023202420252026
290.90M
99.51M
(AVO) Total Revenue
(CCEC) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

AVO vs. CCEC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Mission Produce, Inc. and Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

0.0%10.0%20.0%30.0%40.0%50.0%60.0%20222023202420252026
7.1%
53.9%
Portfolio components
AVO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported a gross profit of 20.50M and revenue of 290.90M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 7.1%.

CCEC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp reported a gross profit of 53.60M and revenue of 99.51M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 53.9%.

AVO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported an operating income of -7.00M and revenue of 290.90M, resulting in an operating margin of -2.4%.

CCEC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp reported an operating income of 50.01M and revenue of 99.51M, resulting in an operating margin of 50.3%.

AVO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Mission Produce, Inc. reported a net income of -7.20M and revenue of 290.90M, resulting in a net margin of -2.5%.

CCEC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Capital Clean Energy Carriers Corp reported a net income of 23.76M and revenue of 99.51M, resulting in a net margin of 23.9%.


Frequently Asked Questions


AVO and CCEC have a correlation of -0.01, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

AVO has higher volatility (13.74%) compared to CCEC (13.19%). In terms of maximum drawdown, AVO dropped -62.71% vs CCEC's -28.04%.

AVO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (-0.27 vs -0.36), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for AVO and CCEC

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer