UEVM vs. ULVM
UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) and ULVM (VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF) are both Momentum funds from Victory Capital - UEVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index while ULVM tracks the Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 5 years, UEVM returned 7.55%/yr vs 11.43%/yr for ULVM. A 0.61 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UEVM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.20%/yr for ULVM.
Performance
UEVM vs. ULVM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than ULVM's 14.84% return.
UEVM
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
ULVM
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 3.70%
- YTD
- 14.84%
- 6M
- 14.92%
- 1Y
- 28.96%
- 3Y*
- 21.27%
- 5Y*
- 11.43%
- 10Y*
- —
UEVM vs. ULVM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.99% | 22.74% | 11.92% | 17.41% | -14.60% | 11.09% | 3.77% | 10.71% | -16.96% | 3.70% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 14.84% | 15.84% | 19.76% | 10.16% | -9.04% | 31.06% | 3.51% | 22.08% | -12.07% | 4.30% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEVM and ULVM is 0.55, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.55 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.50 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.56 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 27, 2017 | 0.61 |
The correlation between UEVM and ULVM shifts across timeframes, from 0.50 (3 years) to 0.61 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
UEVM vs. ULVM - Sectors Allocation Comparison
Sectors
UEVM
ULVM
Financial Services
Technology
Industrials
Consumer Defensive
Energy
Consumer Cyclical
Basic Materials
Healthcare
Utilities
Real Estate
Communication Services
Financial Services
UEVM
ULVM
Technology
UEVM
ULVM
Industrials
UEVM
ULVM
Consumer Defensive
UEVM
ULVM
Energy
UEVM
ULVM
Consumer Cyclical
UEVM
ULVM
Basic Materials
UEVM
ULVM
Healthcare
UEVM
ULVM
Utilities
UEVM
ULVM
Real Estate
UEVM
ULVM
Communication Services
UEVM
ULVM
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEVM vs. ULVM — Risk / Return Rank
UEVM
ULVM
UEVM vs. ULVM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UEVM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.06 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.56 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | 1.47 | -0.18 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | 4.50 | -1.94 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | 18.64 | -9.99 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UEVM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | 2.71 | -1.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | 0.74 | -0.27 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 0.58 | -0.25 |
Drawdowns
UEVM vs. ULVM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than ULVM's maximum drawdown of -40.71%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and ULVM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEVM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -40.71% | -4.73% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | -6.47% | -3.32% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.88% | -18.14% | -0.74% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.98% | -19.77% | -7.21% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | -0.13% | -2.05% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -5.75% | -5.92% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | 1.56% | +1.33% |
Volatility
UEVM vs. ULVM - Volatility Comparison
VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) has a higher volatility of 5.15% compared to VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF (ULVM) at 2.96%. This indicates that UEVM's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ULVM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEVM | ULVM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | 2.96% | +2.19% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | 7.97% | +4.16% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 10.74% | +4.44% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 15.48% | +0.42% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 18.86% | -0.47% |
UEVM vs. ULVM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is higher than ULVM's 0.20% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEVM vs. ULVM - Dividend Comparison
UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than ULVM's 1.58% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 3.05% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% |
ULVM VictoryShares US Value Momentum ETF | 1.58% | 1.81% | 1.57% | 1.94% | 1.91% | 1.36% | 1.51% | 1.88% | 1.67% | 0.38% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UEVM and ULVM have a correlation of 0.55, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UEVM has higher volatility (5.15%) compared to ULVM (2.96%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UEVM dropped -45.44% vs ULVM's -40.71%.
On 5-year performance, ULVM leads with 11.43% vs 7.55% for UEVM. On fees, ULVM is cheaper at 0.20% per year. On volatility, ULVM has been the lower-risk option at 2.96%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 5-year period, ULVM has performed better with a 11.43% return vs 7.55%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
ULVM is cheaper with a 0.20% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for UEVM.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 1.58% for ULVM.
UEVM tracks Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while ULVM tracks Nasdaq Victory US Value Momentum Index. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.20% for ULVM.
ULVM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 1.65), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UEVM and ULVM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer