UEVM vs. SMOM
UEVM (VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF) and SMOM (Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UEVM is a Momentum fund tracking the Nasdaq Victory Emerging Market Value Momentum Index, while SMOM is a Large Cap Blend Equities fund actively managed by Symmetry Partners. UEVM is passively managed, while SMOM is actively managed. A 0.66 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UEVM charges 0.45%/yr vs 0.63%/yr for SMOM.
Performance
UEVM vs. SMOM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UEVM achieves a 8.99% return, which is significantly lower than SMOM's 9.82% return.
UEVM
- 1D
- -1.86%
- 1M
- 0.77%
- YTD
- 8.99%
- 6M
- 8.31%
- 1Y
- 24.92%
- 3Y*
- 18.34%
- 5Y*
- 7.55%
- 10Y*
- —
SMOM
- 1D
- 0.27%
- 1M
- 5.93%
- YTD
- 9.82%
- 6M
- 10.58%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UEVM vs. SMOM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 8.99% | 2.04% |
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 9.82% | 2.81% |
Correlation
The correlation between UEVM and SMOM is 0.66, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 11, 2025 | 0.66 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UEVM vs. SMOM — Risk / Return Rank
UEVM
SMOM
UEVM vs. SMOM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF (UEVM) and Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF (SMOM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UEVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.30 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 2.56 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 8.65 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UEVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.65 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.48 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.33 | 1.45 | -1.12 |
Drawdowns
UEVM vs. SMOM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UEVM drawdown since its inception was -45.44%, which is greater than SMOM's maximum drawdown of -7.45%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UEVM and SMOM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UEVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -45.44% | -7.45% | -37.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -9.79% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -18.88% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -26.98% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -2.18% | 0.00% | -2.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -11.67% | -1.48% | -10.19% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.89% | — | — |
Volatility
UEVM vs. SMOM - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UEVM | SMOM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 5.15% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.13% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 15.18% | 12.62% | +2.56% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 15.90% | 12.62% | +3.28% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 18.39% | 12.62% | +5.77% |
UEVM vs. SMOM - Expense Ratio Comparison
UEVM has a 0.45% expense ratio, which is lower than SMOM's 0.63% expense ratio.
Dividends
UEVM vs. SMOM - Dividend Comparison
UEVM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.05%, more than SMOM's 0.15% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SMOM Symmetry Panoramic Sector Momentum ETF | 0.15% | 0.16% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UEVM VictoryShares Emerging Markets Value Momentum ETF | 3.05% | 4.02% | 5.65% | 4.71% | 3.46% | 4.49% | 2.19% | 2.79% | 2.34% | 0.79% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UEVM and SMOM have a correlation of 0.66, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UEVM is cheaper at 0.45% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UEVM is cheaper with a 0.45% expense ratio, compared with 0.63% for SMOM.
UEVM has the higher dividend yield at 3.05%, compared with 0.15% for SMOM.
UEVM is categorized as Momentum, while SMOM is Large Cap Blend Equities. They also come from different issuers: Victory Capital and Symmetry Partners. Their fees differ too: 0.45% for UEVM and 0.63% for SMOM.
Find the right allocation for UEVM and SMOM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer