UDPIX vs. RMQHX
Compare and contrast key facts about ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 ProFund (UDPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX).
UDPIX is managed by ProFunds. It was launched on Jun 2, 2002. RMQHX is a passively managed fund by Guggenheim that tracks the performance of the NASDAQ-100. It was launched on Nov 28, 2014.
Performance
UDPIX vs. RMQHX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UDPIX vs. RMQHX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDPIX ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 ProFund | -12.54% | 19.96% | 18.13% | 23.94% | -19.89% | 52.21% | 15.74% | 47.47% | -13.82% | 54.86% |
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | -19.03% | 33.90% | 44.74% | 115.89% | -59.96% | 56.33% | 101.06% | 80.70% | -7.28% | 69.79% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDPIX achieves a -12.54% return, which is significantly higher than RMQHX's -19.03% return. Over the past 10 years, UDPIX has underperformed RMQHX with an annualized return of 18.20%, while RMQHX has yielded a comparatively higher 30.11% annualized return.
UDPIX
- 1D
- 0.19%
- 1M
- -15.04%
- YTD
- -12.54%
- 6M
- -7.17%
- 1Y
- 9.29%
- 3Y*
- 15.50%
- 5Y*
- 10.03%
- 10Y*
- 18.20%
RMQHX
- 1D
- -1.68%
- 1M
- -16.37%
- YTD
- -19.03%
- 6M
- -16.54%
- 1Y
- 31.59%
- 3Y*
- 33.83%
- 5Y*
- 15.52%
- 10Y*
- 30.11%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UDPIX vs. RMQHX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UDPIX has a 1.54% expense ratio, which is higher than RMQHX's 1.27% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UDPIX vs. RMQHX — Risk / Return Rank
UDPIX
RMQHX
UDPIX vs. RMQHX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 ProFund (UDPIX) and Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UDPIX | RMQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 0.67 | -0.32 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.72 | 1.28 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.10 | 1.18 | -0.08 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.36 | 0.96 | -0.60 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.27 | 3.35 | -2.08 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UDPIX | RMQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 0.67 | -0.32 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.34 | 0.34 | 0.00 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.52 | 0.65 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.63 | -0.32 |
Correlation
The correlation between UDPIX and RMQHX is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UDPIX vs. RMQHX - Dividend Comparison
UDPIX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.46%, less than RMQHX's 42.94% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UDPIX ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 ProFund | 4.46% | 3.90% | 0.00% | 0.95% | 0.00% | 13.43% | 14.53% | 1.96% | 0.93% | 0.02% |
RMQHX Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H | 42.94% | 34.77% | 25.22% | 3.66% | 0.00% | 2.13% | 5.17% | 0.10% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UDPIX vs. RMQHX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDPIX drawdown since its inception was -81.97%, which is greater than RMQHX's maximum drawdown of -63.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDPIX and RMQHX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDPIX | RMQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -81.97% | -63.21% | -18.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -20.97% | -25.11% | +4.14% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -40.44% | -63.21% | +22.77% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -63.40% | -63.21% | -0.19% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -19.22% | -24.97% | +5.75% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -17.66% | -13.01% | -4.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.00% | 7.21% | -1.21% |
Volatility
UDPIX vs. RMQHX - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for ProFunds Ultra Dow 30 ProFund (UDPIX) is 8.10%, while Rydex Monthly Rebalance NASDAQ-100 2x Strategy H (RMQHX) has a volatility of 11.12%. This indicates that UDPIX experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RMQHX based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UDPIX | RMQHX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.10% | 11.12% | -3.02% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 17.88% | 25.22% | -7.34% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 33.34% | 47.33% | -13.99% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 29.83% | 46.20% | -16.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 35.04% | 46.31% | -11.27% |