UDEC vs. AIOO
UDEC (Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December) and AIOO (AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF) are both Defined Outcome funds. UDEC is passively managed, while AIOO is actively managed. A 0.73 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. UDEC charges 0.79%/yr vs 0.64%/yr for AIOO.
Performance
UDEC vs. AIOO - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UDEC achieves a 5.14% return, which is significantly higher than AIOO's 2.34% return.
UDEC
- 1D
- -0.12%
- 1M
- 2.11%
- YTD
- 5.14%
- 6M
- 5.49%
- 1Y
- 17.31%
- 3Y*
- 12.44%
- 5Y*
- 7.26%
- 10Y*
- —
AIOO
- 1D
- -0.13%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 2.34%
- 6M
- 2.33%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
UDEC vs. AIOO - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
UDEC Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December | 5.14% | 8.99% |
AIOO AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF | 2.34% | 2.67% |
Correlation
The correlation between UDEC and AIOO is 0.73, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 2, 2025 | 0.73 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UDEC vs. AIOO — Risk / Return Rank
UDEC
AIOO
UDEC vs. AIOO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC) and AllianzIM U.S. Equity Buffer100 Protection ETF (AIOO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UDEC | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | — | — | |
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | — | — | |
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.53 | — | — |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.91 | — | — |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 19.15 | — | — |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UDEC | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 2.66 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.02 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.91 | 2.79 | -1.87 |
Drawdowns
UDEC vs. AIOO - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UDEC drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, which is greater than AIOO's maximum drawdown of -0.74%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDEC and AIOO.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UDEC | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -13.37% | -0.74% | -12.63% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.44% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.94% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -10.26% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -0.15% | -0.13% | -0.02% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.16% | -0.17% | -1.99% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 0.91% | — | — |
Volatility
UDEC vs. AIOO - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UDEC | AIOO | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 0.93% | — | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.27% | — | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.53% | 1.99% | +4.54% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 7.18% | 1.99% | +5.19% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 8.02% | 1.99% | +6.03% |
UDEC vs. AIOO - Expense Ratio Comparison
UDEC has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is higher than AIOO's 0.64% expense ratio.
Dividends
UDEC vs. AIOO - Dividend Comparison
Neither UDEC nor AIOO has paid dividends to shareholders.
Frequently Asked Questions
UDEC and AIOO have a correlation of 0.73, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, AIOO is cheaper at 0.64% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
AIOO is cheaper with a 0.64% expense ratio, compared with 0.79% for UDEC.
UDEC and AIOO have nearly identical dividend yields, around 0.00%.
They also come from different issuers: Innovator and Allianz. Their fees differ too: 0.79% for UDEC and 0.64% for AIOO.
Find the right allocation for UDEC and AIOO
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer