PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UDEC vs. BDEC
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UDEC vs. BDEC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UDEC vs. BDEC - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022202120202019
UDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December
-2.02%12.97%9.52%16.80%-9.44%6.44%6.72%1.16%
BDEC
Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December
-3.15%14.96%12.71%19.86%-9.42%15.45%13.39%2.40%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UDEC achieves a -2.02% return, which is significantly higher than BDEC's -3.15% return.


UDEC

1D
1.38%
1M
-2.49%
YTD
-2.02%
6M
1.22%
1Y
13.24%
3Y*
10.86%
5Y*
6.01%
10Y*

BDEC

1D
2.08%
1M
-3.63%
YTD
-3.15%
6M
0.15%
1Y
14.68%
3Y*
12.37%
5Y*
8.43%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UDEC vs. BDEC - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both UDEC and BDEC have an expense ratio of 0.79%.


Return for Risk

UDEC vs. BDEC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UDEC
UDEC Risk / Return Rank: 8484
Overall Rank
UDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8080
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 8383
Sortino Ratio Rank
UDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 8181
Omega Ratio Rank
UDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 8686
Calmar Ratio Rank
UDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 9090
Martin Ratio Rank

BDEC
BDEC Risk / Return Rank: 6868
Overall Rank
BDEC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BDEC Sortino Ratio Rank: 6565
Sortino Ratio Rank
BDEC Omega Ratio Rank: 6969
Omega Ratio Rank
BDEC Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
BDEC Martin Ratio Rank: 7777
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UDEC vs. BDEC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC) and Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UDECBDECDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.52

1.10

+0.42

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.22

1.66

+0.56

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.32

1.25

+0.07

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.71

1.67

+1.03

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.87

8.36

+3.51

UDEC vs. BDEC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UDEC Sharpe Ratio is 1.52, which is higher than the BDEC Sharpe Ratio of 1.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UDEC and BDEC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UDECBDECDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.52

1.10

+0.42

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.85

0.71

+0.14

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.78

0.70

+0.09

Correlation

The correlation between UDEC and BDEC is 0.91, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UDEC vs. BDEC - Dividend Comparison

Neither UDEC nor BDEC has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Drawdowns

UDEC vs. BDEC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UDEC drawdown since its inception was -13.37%, smaller than the maximum BDEC drawdown of -25.60%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UDEC and BDEC.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UDECBDECDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.37%

-25.60%

+12.23%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.99%

-9.02%

+4.03%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-10.26%

-16.44%

+6.18%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-3.12%

-4.57%

+1.45%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.21%

-3.12%

+0.91%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.14%

1.81%

-0.67%

Volatility

UDEC vs. BDEC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - December (UDEC) is 2.54%, while Innovator U.S. Equity Buffer ETF - December (BDEC) has a volatility of 3.90%. This indicates that UDEC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BDEC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UDECBDECDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.54%

3.90%

-1.36%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

5.15%

7.20%

-2.05%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

8.75%

13.46%

-4.71%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.14%

11.94%

-4.80%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.08%

14.40%

-6.32%