UCO vs. DGP
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP).
UCO and DGP are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UCO is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones-UBS Crude Oil Sub-Index (200%). It was launched on Nov 24, 2008. DGP is a passively managed fund by Deutsche Bank that tracks the performance of the Deutsche Bank Liquid Commodity Index-Optimum Yield Gold (200%). It was launched on Feb 27, 2008. Both UCO and DGP are passive ETFs, meaning that they are not actively managed but aim to replicate the performance of the underlying index as closely as possible.
Performance
UCO vs. DGP - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UCO vs. DGP - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCO ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil | 92.55% | -29.75% | 5.36% | -13.89% | 39.71% | 139.26% | -92.91% | 53.83% | -43.26% | 0.34% |
DGP DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes | 16.89% | 141.40% | 53.16% | 16.97% | -5.54% | -11.29% | 45.29% | 32.27% | -7.48% | 24.20% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCO achieves a 92.55% return, which is significantly higher than DGP's 16.89% return. Over the past 10 years, UCO has underperformed DGP with an annualized return of -9.67%, while DGP has yielded a comparatively higher 22.78% annualized return.
UCO
- 1D
- -5.34%
- 1M
- 34.20%
- YTD
- 92.55%
- 6M
- 67.42%
- 1Y
- 37.47%
- 3Y*
- 12.01%
- 5Y*
- 21.35%
- 10Y*
- -9.67%
DGP
- 1D
- 2.85%
- 1M
- -21.64%
- YTD
- 16.89%
- 6M
- 41.16%
- 1Y
- 107.27%
- 3Y*
- 64.55%
- 5Y*
- 39.08%
- 10Y*
- 22.78%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCO vs. DGP - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCO has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than DGP's 0.75% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UCO vs. DGP — Risk / Return Rank
UCO
DGP
UCO vs. DGP - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) and DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCO | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.66 | 1.95 | -1.29 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.20 | 2.32 | -1.12 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.15 | 1.33 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.08 | 2.92 | -1.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.80 | 11.08 | -9.27 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCO | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.66 | 1.95 | -1.29 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.36 | 1.02 | -0.66 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.14 | 0.65 | -0.79 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.36 | 0.31 | -0.67 |
Correlation
The correlation between UCO and DGP is 0.16, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
UCO vs. DGP - Dividend Comparison
Neither UCO nor DGP has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UCO vs. DGP - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCO drawdown since its inception was -99.95%, which is greater than DGP's maximum drawdown of -75.31%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCO and DGP.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCO | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.95% | -75.31% | -24.64% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -34.77% | -36.58% | +1.81% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -67.24% | -51.24% | -16.00% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -98.75% | -51.24% | -47.51% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.40% | -22.22% | -77.18% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -85.35% | -41.24% | -44.11% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 20.76% | 9.64% | +11.12% |
Volatility
UCO vs. DGP - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Bloomberg Crude Oil (UCO) has a higher volatility of 25.64% compared to DB Gold Double Long Exchange Traded Notes (DGP) at 24.21%. This indicates that UCO's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than DGP based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UCO | DGP | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 25.64% | 24.21% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 40.74% | 48.07% | -7.33% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 57.38% | 55.32% | +2.06% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 59.11% | 38.34% | +20.77% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 71.31% | 34.93% | +36.38% |