UCC vs. XDSQ
Compare and contrast key facts about ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ).
UCC and XDSQ are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. UCC is a passively managed fund by ProShares that tracks the performance of the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%). It was launched on Jan 30, 2007. XDSQ is an actively managed fund by Innovator. It was launched on Apr 1, 2021.
Performance
UCC vs. XDSQ - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UCC vs. XDSQ - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | -18.49% | 2.21% | 44.24% | 61.67% | -57.59% | 10.49% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | -4.89% | 14.22% | 23.12% | 23.00% | -16.78% | 12.75% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -18.49% return, which is significantly lower than XDSQ's -4.89% return.
UCC
- 1D
- 6.18%
- 1M
- -13.60%
- YTD
- -18.49%
- 6M
- -20.58%
- 1Y
- 9.89%
- 3Y*
- 17.11%
- 5Y*
- -1.86%
- 10Y*
- 12.29%
XDSQ
- 1D
- 2.74%
- 1M
- -6.22%
- YTD
- -4.89%
- 6M
- -0.69%
- 1Y
- 13.87%
- 3Y*
- 14.17%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UCC vs. XDSQ - Expense Ratio Comparison
UCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than XDSQ's 0.79% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UCC vs. XDSQ — Risk / Return Rank
UCC
XDSQ
UCC vs. XDSQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UCC | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.21 | 0.77 | -0.56 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.66 | 1.22 | -0.56 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.20 | -0.12 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.35 | 1.19 | -0.84 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.11 | 5.87 | -4.77 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UCC | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.21 | 0.77 | -0.56 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.04 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.31 | — | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.31 | 0.60 | -0.28 |
Correlation
The correlation between UCC and XDSQ is 0.81, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UCC vs. XDSQ - Dividend Comparison
UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.33%, while XDSQ has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UCC ProShares Ultra Consumer Services | 1.33% | 1.10% | 0.17% | 0.04% | 0.25% | 0.00% | 0.02% | 0.17% | 0.18% | 0.14% | 0.21% | 0.14% |
XDSQ Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Drawdowns
UCC vs. XDSQ - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, which is greater than XDSQ's maximum drawdown of -26.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and XDSQ.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UCC | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.05% | -26.06% | -56.99% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -29.14% | -12.18% | -16.96% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -61.77% | — | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -61.77% | — | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.22% | -7.12% | -20.10% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -21.85% | -5.08% | -16.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 9.32% | 2.47% | +6.85% |
Volatility
UCC vs. XDSQ - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) has a higher volatility of 14.63% compared to Innovator US Equity Accelerated ETF (XDSQ) at 5.65%. This indicates that UCC's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XDSQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UCC | XDSQ | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.63% | 5.65% | +8.98% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 27.25% | 9.60% | +17.65% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 47.31% | 17.99% | +29.32% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 43.30% | 15.32% | +27.98% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 40.43% | 15.32% | +25.11% |