PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UCC vs. BNO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UCC vs. BNO

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UCC (ProShares Ultra Consumer Services) and BNO (United States Brent Oil Fund LP) are both exchange-traded funds - UCC is a Leveraged Equities fund tracking the Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while BNO is a Oil & Gas fund tracking the Front Month Brent Crude Oil. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UCC returned 14.02%/yr vs 13.60%/yr for BNO. At a 0.16 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UCC charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.90%/yr for BNO.

Performance

UCC vs. BNO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UCC achieves a -8.01% return, which is significantly lower than BNO's 90.47% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UCC having a 14.02% annualized return and BNO not far behind at 13.60%.

UCC

1D
-1.54%
1M
-2.42%
YTD
-8.01%
6M
-8.22%
1Y
8.56%
3Y*
18.68%
5Y*
0.42%
10Y*
14.02%

BNO

1D
1.99%
1M
-10.29%
YTD
90.47%
6M
86.00%
1Y
91.89%
3Y*
27.93%
5Y*
24.16%
10Y*
13.60%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UCC vs. BNO - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services		-8.01%2.21%44.24%61.67%-57.59%20.92%46.55%53.76%-4.94%42.05%
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		90.47%-5.44%9.67%-3.43%35.25%62.34%-38.23%36.01%-15.30%15.43%

Correlation

The correlation between UCC and BNO is -0.30, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.

Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.30

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.09

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 3, 2010

0.16

The correlation between UCC and BNO shifts across timeframes, from -0.30 (1 year) to 0.16 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

ProShares Ultra Consumer Services

United States Brent Oil Fund LP

Often compared with UCC:
UCC vs. RXLUCC vs. FDISUCC vs. FNGSUCC vs. ROMUCC vs. UPROUCC vs. VGTUCC vs. USD
Often compared with BNO:
BNO vs. USOBNO vs. XLEBNO vs. USLBNO vs. BOILBNO vs. UNGBNO vs. UCOBNO vs. XOM

Return for Risk

UCC vs. BNO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UCC
UCC Risk / Return Rank: 1313
Overall Rank
UCC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1212
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UCC Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
UCC Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
UCC Calmar Ratio Rank: 1212
Calmar Ratio Rank
UCC Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank
BNO
BNO Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
BNO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6666
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BNO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5656
Sortino Ratio Rank
BNO Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BNO Calmar Ratio Rank: 8888
Calmar Ratio Rank
BNO Martin Ratio Rank: 5555
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UCC vs. BNO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) and United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UCCBNODifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
0.24
2.23

-1.99

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
0.59
2.73

-2.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.38

-0.31

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.30

5.17

-4.87

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.85

9.76

-8.91

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UCC vs. BNO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UCC Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the BNO Sharpe Ratio of 2.23. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UCC and BNO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UCCBNODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.24

2.23

-1.99

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.01

0.69

-0.68

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.35

0.37

-0.03

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.33

0.14

+0.19

Drawdowns

UCC vs. BNO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UCC drawdown since its inception was -83.05%, roughly equal to the maximum BNO drawdown of -87.06%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UCC and BNO.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UCCBNODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-83.05%

-87.06%

+4.01%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-29.14%

-17.87%

-11.27%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.01%

-23.75%

-24.26%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.77%

-33.70%

-28.07%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.77%

-75.18%

+13.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-17.87%

-10.29%

-7.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.81%

-40.17%

+18.36%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

10.10%

9.45%

+0.65%

Volatility

UCC vs. BNO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra Consumer Services (UCC) is 10.35%, while United States Brent Oil Fund LP (BNO) has a volatility of 14.22%. This indicates that UCC experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BNO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UCCBNODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

10.35%

14.22%

-3.87%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

26.42%

36.10%

-9.68%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

36.21%

41.46%

-5.25%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

43.60%

35.38%

+8.22%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

40.62%

36.68%

+3.94%

UCC vs. BNO - Expense Ratio Comparison

UCC has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than BNO's 0.90% expense ratio.

Dividends

UCC vs. BNO - Dividend Comparison

UCC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.18%, while BNO has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BNO
United States Brent Oil Fund LP		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UCC
ProShares Ultra Consumer Services		1.18%1.10%0.17%0.04%0.25%0.00%0.02%0.17%0.18%0.14%0.21%0.14%

Frequently Asked Questions

UCC and BNO have a correlation of -0.30, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BNO has higher volatility (14.22%) compared to UCC (10.35%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UCC dropped -83.05% vs BNO's -87.06%.

On 10-year performance, UCC leads with 14.02% vs 13.60% for BNO. On fees, BNO is cheaper at 0.90% per year. On volatility, UCC has been the lower-risk option at 10.35%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 10-year period, UCC has performed better with a 14.02% return vs 13.60%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

BNO is cheaper with a 0.90% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UCC.

UCC has the higher dividend yield at 1.18%, compared with 0.00% for BNO.

UCC is categorized as Leveraged Equities, while BNO is Oil & Gas. UCC tracks Dow Jones U.S. Consumer Services Index (200%), while BNO tracks Front Month Brent Crude Oil. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and Concierge Technologies. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UCC and 0.90% for BNO.

BNO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.23 vs 0.24), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UCC and BNO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer