UBVLX vs. FASGX
Compare and contrast key facts about Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund (UBVLX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX).
UBVLX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 28, 1998. FASGX is managed by BlackRock. It was launched on Dec 30, 1991.
Performance
UBVLX vs. FASGX - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
UBVLX vs. FASGX - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBVLX Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund | 1.23% | 1.79% | 13.11% | 14.69% | -1.16% | 34.25% | 3.52% | 23.27% | -15.23% | 13.43% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | -2.99% | 18.23% | 10.81% | 16.45% | -16.83% | 13.98% | 17.19% | 22.81% | -7.65% | 17.34% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBVLX achieves a 1.23% return, which is significantly higher than FASGX's -2.99% return. Over the past 10 years, UBVLX has outperformed FASGX with an annualized return of 9.68%, while FASGX has yielded a comparatively lower 8.70% annualized return.
UBVLX
- 1D
- -0.11%
- 1M
- -7.06%
- YTD
- 1.23%
- 6M
- 0.50%
- 1Y
- 7.15%
- 3Y*
- 9.97%
- 5Y*
- 7.65%
- 10Y*
- 9.68%
FASGX
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -7.42%
- YTD
- -2.99%
- 6M
- -0.12%
- 1Y
- 15.54%
- 3Y*
- 11.72%
- 5Y*
- 6.38%
- 10Y*
- 8.70%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
UBVLX vs. FASGX - Expense Ratio Comparison
UBVLX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is higher than FASGX's 0.67% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
UBVLX vs. FASGX — Risk / Return Rank
UBVLX
FASGX
UBVLX vs. FASGX - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund (UBVLX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UBVLX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.34 | 1.21 | -0.87 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 0.65 | 1.73 | -1.08 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.26 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.38 | 1.55 | -1.17 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.25 | 6.89 | -5.64 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UBVLX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 | 1.21 | -0.87 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.38 | 0.53 | -0.15 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.39 | 0.70 | -0.30 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.46 | 0.60 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between UBVLX and FASGX is 0.80, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
UBVLX vs. FASGX - Dividend Comparison
UBVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.30%, more than FASGX's 7.56% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBVLX Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund | 9.30% | 9.41% | 7.39% | 8.35% | 8.96% | 3.44% | 0.99% | 4.98% | 11.62% | 4.67% | 3.24% | 3.80% |
FASGX Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund | 7.56% | 7.33% | 4.60% | 1.72% | 6.69% | 2.73% | 2.20% | 5.19% | 6.31% | 2.75% | 0.20% | 5.58% |
Drawdowns
UBVLX vs. FASGX - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBVLX drawdown since its inception was -67.24%, which is greater than FASGX's maximum drawdown of -47.35%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBVLX and FASGX.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBVLX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -67.24% | -47.35% | -19.89% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.53% | -9.07% | -5.46% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -21.46% | -23.54% | +2.08% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -52.08% | -27.20% | -24.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.81% | -7.95% | +0.14% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -9.31% | -6.74% | -2.57% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 2.04% | +2.41% |
Volatility
UBVLX vs. FASGX - Volatility Comparison
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund (UBVLX) and Fidelity Asset Manager 70% Fund (FASGX) have volatilities of 4.41% and 4.57%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| UBVLX | FASGX | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.41% | 4.57% | -0.16% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 11.84% | 7.78% | +4.06% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 21.77% | 12.82% | +8.95% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 20.48% | 12.14% | +8.34% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 24.59% | 12.56% | +12.03% |