PortfoliosLab logo
PortfoliosLab logo
Tools
Performance Analysis
Portfolio Analysis
Factor Model
Portfolios
Lazy PortfoliosUser Portfolios
Discussions
UBVLX vs. FCPVX
Performance
Risk-Adjusted Performance
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Correlation

The correlation between UBVLX and FCPVX is 0.93, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


-0.50.00.51.00.9

Performance

UBVLX vs. FCPVX - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund (UBVLX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

-5.00%0.00%5.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-1.63%
-4.32%
UBVLX
FCPVX

Key characteristics

Sharpe Ratio

UBVLX:

0.57

FCPVX:

0.32

Sortino Ratio

UBVLX:

0.95

FCPVX:

0.59

Omega Ratio

UBVLX:

1.11

FCPVX:

1.07

Calmar Ratio

UBVLX:

0.76

FCPVX:

0.42

Martin Ratio

UBVLX:

1.98

FCPVX:

1.17

Ulcer Index

UBVLX:

4.80%

FCPVX:

4.99%

Daily Std Dev

UBVLX:

16.62%

FCPVX:

18.49%

Max Drawdown

UBVLX:

-69.52%

FCPVX:

-58.43%

Current Drawdown

UBVLX:

-8.86%

FCPVX:

-6.63%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBVLX achieves a 1.59% return, which is significantly lower than FCPVX's 2.36% return. Over the past 10 years, UBVLX has outperformed FCPVX with an annualized return of 5.66%, while FCPVX has yielded a comparatively lower 2.80% annualized return.


UBVLX

YTD

1.59%

1M

-2.62%

6M

0.76%

1Y

9.73%

5Y*

8.85%

10Y*

5.66%

FCPVX

YTD

2.36%

1M

-3.25%

6M

-1.35%

1Y

5.82%

5Y*

7.24%

10Y*

2.80%

*Annualized

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UBVLX vs. FCPVX - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBVLX has a 0.90% expense ratio, which is lower than FCPVX's 0.99% expense ratio.


FCPVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
Expense ratio chart for FCPVX: current value at 0.99% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.99%
Expense ratio chart for UBVLX: current value at 0.90% compared with the broader market ranging from 0.00% to 2.12%.0.50%1.00%1.50%2.00%0.90%

Risk-Adjusted Performance

UBVLX vs. FCPVX — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBVLX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of UBVLX is 3232
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of UBVLX is 2525
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of UBVLX is 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of UBVLX is 2424
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of UBVLX is 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of UBVLX is 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

FCPVX
The Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank of FCPVX is 1919
Overall Rank
The Sharpe Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
The Sortino Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
The Omega Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
The Calmar Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
The Martin Ratio Rank of FCPVX is 1717
Martin Ratio Rank
The risk-adjusted ranks indicate the investment's position relative to the market. A rank closer to 100 signifies top-performing investments, while a rank closer to 0 might suggest underperformance, based on the selected ratio. The values are calculated based on the past 12 months of returns.

UBVLX vs. FCPVX - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund (UBVLX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


Sharpe ratio
The chart of Sharpe ratio for UBVLX, currently valued at 0.57, compared to the broader market-1.000.001.002.003.004.000.570.32
The chart of Sortino ratio for UBVLX, currently valued at 0.95, compared to the broader market0.002.004.006.008.0010.0012.000.950.59
The chart of Omega ratio for UBVLX, currently valued at 1.11, compared to the broader market1.002.003.004.001.111.07
The chart of Calmar ratio for UBVLX, currently valued at 0.76, compared to the broader market0.005.0010.0015.0020.000.760.42
The chart of Martin ratio for UBVLX, currently valued at 1.98, compared to the broader market0.0020.0040.0060.0080.001.981.17
UBVLX
FCPVX

The current UBVLX Sharpe Ratio is 0.57, which is higher than the FCPVX Sharpe Ratio of 0.32. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBVLX and FCPVX, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Rolling 12-month Sharpe Ratio0.000.501.001.50SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
0.57
0.32
UBVLX
FCPVX

Dividends

UBVLX vs. FCPVX - Dividend Comparison

UBVLX's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.85%, more than FCPVX's 0.59% yield.


TTM20242023202220212020201920182017201620152014
UBVLX
Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund
1.85%1.88%1.72%1.13%0.99%0.90%0.80%1.54%2.59%0.99%0.86%1.08%
FCPVX
Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund
0.59%0.60%0.64%0.00%2.04%0.46%0.81%1.10%1.09%0.77%12.28%12.65%

Drawdowns

UBVLX vs. FCPVX - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBVLX drawdown since its inception was -69.52%, which is greater than FCPVX's maximum drawdown of -58.43%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBVLX and FCPVX. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.


-12.00%-10.00%-8.00%-6.00%-4.00%-2.00%0.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
-8.86%
-6.63%
UBVLX
FCPVX

Volatility

UBVLX vs. FCPVX - Volatility Comparison

Undiscovered Managers Behavioral Value Fund (UBVLX) and Fidelity Small Cap Value Fund (FCPVX) have volatilities of 3.75% and 3.71%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


3.00%4.00%5.00%6.00%7.00%8.00%SeptemberOctoberNovemberDecember2025February
3.75%
3.71%
UBVLX
FCPVX
PortfoliosLab logo
Performance Analysis
Portfolio AnalysisPortfolio PerformanceStock ComparisonSharpe RatioMartin RatioTreynor RatioSortino RatioOmega RatioCalmar RatioSummers Ratio
Community
Discussions


Disclaimer

The information contained herein does not constitute investment advice and made available for educational purposes only. Prices and returns on equities are listed without consideration of fees, commissions, taxes, penalties, or interest payable due to purchasing, holding, or selling.

Copyright © 2025 PortfoliosLab