PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo

Documentation

Upgrade your plan
UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE

Last updated Jun 5, 2026

UBUD.DE (UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist) and BCFS.DE (UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc) are both exchange-traded funds - UBUD.DE is a Precious Metals fund tracking the Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners, while BCFS.DE is a Options Trading fund tracking the US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index. Both are passively managed. At a 0.34 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBUD.DE charges 0.43%/yr vs 0.24%/yr for BCFS.DE.

Performance

UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBUD.DE achieves a -6.38% return, which is significantly lower than BCFS.DE's 4.49% return.

UBUD.DE

1D
-0.04%
1M
-3.95%
YTD
-6.38%
6M
0.94%
1Y
47.84%
3Y*
42.44%
5Y*
24.10%
10Y*
14.59%

BCFS.DE

1D
0.42%
1M
1.32%
YTD
4.49%
6M
5.09%
1Y
—
3Y*
—
5Y*
—
10Y*
—
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison

2026 (YTD)2025
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist		-6.38%69.49%
BCFS.DE
UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc		4.49%4.64%

Correlation

The correlation between UBUD.DE and BCFS.DE is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

Correlation
Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025

0.34

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist

UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc

Often compared with UBUD.DE:
UBUD.DE vs. VVMX.DEUBUD.DE vs. 3GOL.LUBUD.DE vs. ETLX.DEUBUD.DE vs. GDMNUBUD.DE vs. NUKL.DEUBUD.DE vs. SPMOUBUD.DE vs. ARKW
Often compared with BCFS.DE:
BCFS.DE vs. UIQ4.DEBCFS.DE vs. 4UBF.DEBCFS.DE vs. AW1C.DEBCFS.DE vs. 4UBQ.DEBCFS.DE vs. BCFE.DEBCFS.DE vs. UBU7.DEBCFS.DE vs. S5SD.DE

Return for Risk

UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.
UBUD.DE
UBUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2929
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3434
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank
BCFS.DE
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

UBUD.DEBCFS.DEDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility
1.04

—

—

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk
1.54

—

—

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

—

—

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.65

—

—

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.06

—

—

Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period

UBUD.DEBCFS.DEDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.04

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

—

—

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

3.09

-2.82

Drawdowns

UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.79%, which is greater than BCFS.DE's maximum drawdown of -2.21%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUD.DE and BCFS.DE.

Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators

UBUD.DEBCFS.DEDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.79%

-2.21%

-55.58%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.94%

—

—

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.94%

—

—

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.21%

—

—

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.40%

—

—

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.15%

0.00%

-27.15%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-0.17%

-27.90%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.75%

—

—

Volatility

UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE - Volatility Comparison

Loading charts...

Volatility by Period

UBUD.DEBCFS.DEDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

13.71%

—

—

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

35.92%

—

—

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.63%

3.67%

+41.96%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.68%

3.67%

+32.01%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.58%

3.67%

+31.91%

UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBUD.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is higher than BCFS.DE's 0.24% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBUD.DE vs. BCFS.DE - Dividend Comparison

UBUD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, while BCFS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders.

PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
BCFS.DE
UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc		0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist		0.59%0.40%0.56%1.74%1.12%1.15%0.44%0.42%0.48%0.46%0.43%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions

UBUD.DE and BCFS.DE have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, BCFS.DE is cheaper at 0.24% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

BCFS.DE is cheaper with a 0.24% expense ratio, compared with 0.43% for UBUD.DE.

UBUD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while BCFS.DE is Options Trading. UBUD.DE tracks Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners, while BCFS.DE tracks US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for UBUD.DE and 0.24% for BCFS.DE.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBUD.DE and BCFS.DE

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer