PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBUD.DE vs. GDMN
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBUD.DE vs. GDMN - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a €10,000 investment in UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

UBUD.DE is traded in EUR, while GDMN is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the GDMN values have been converted to EUR using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBUD.DE achieves a -6.35% return, which is significantly lower than GDMN's -2.98% return.


UBUD.DE

1D
-1.68%
1M
-3.23%
YTD
-6.35%
6M
0.30%
1Y
49.43%
3Y*
42.21%
5Y*
24.11%
10Y*
14.79%

GDMN

1D
-3.47%
1M
-1.73%
YTD
-2.98%
6M
3.29%
1Y
73.41%
3Y*
56.68%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBUD.DE vs. GDMN - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
-6.35%144.52%34.69%6.34%0.11%2.42%
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
-2.98%197.09%36.70%9.58%-9.33%4.76%

Correlation

The correlation between UBUD.DE and GDMN is 0.75, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.75

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.75

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Dec 17, 2021

0.76

The correlation between UBUD.DE and GDMN has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.75 to 0.76 - a consistent structural relationship.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBUD.DE vs. GDMN — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBUD.DE
UBUD.DE Risk / Return Rank: 3030
Overall Rank
UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3030
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Sortino Ratio Rank: 2929
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Omega Ratio Rank: 2929
Omega Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBUD.DE Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

GDMN
GDMN Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
GDMN Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GDMN Sortino Ratio Rank: 3030
Sortino Ratio Rank
GDMN Omega Ratio Rank: 3636
Omega Ratio Rank
GDMN Calmar Ratio Rank: 3939
Calmar Ratio Rank
GDMN Martin Ratio Rank: 3131
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBUD.DE vs. GDMN - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) and WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBUD.DEGDMNDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.17

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.08

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.20

1.24

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.70

1.93

-0.23

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

4.24

4.55

-0.30

UBUD.DE vs. GDMN - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBUD.DE Sharpe Ratio is 1.08, which is comparable to the GDMN Sharpe Ratio of 1.24. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBUD.DE and GDMN, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBUD.DEGDMNDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.08

1.24

-0.17

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.67

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.41

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.26

0.84

-0.57

Drawdowns

UBUD.DE vs. GDMN - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBUD.DE drawdown since its inception was -57.79%, which is greater than GDMN's maximum drawdown of -47.07%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBUD.DE and GDMN.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBUD.DEGDMNDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-57.79%

-47.07%

-10.72%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-28.94%

-38.22%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-28.94%

-38.22%

+9.28%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-38.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.40%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-27.13%

-36.44%

+9.31%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-28.07%

-18.30%

-9.77%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.62%

16.20%

-4.58%

Volatility

UBUD.DE vs. GDMN - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist (UBUD.DE) is 15.19%, while WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund (GDMN) has a volatility of 17.03%. This indicates that UBUD.DE experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GDMN based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBUD.DEGDMNDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

15.19%

17.03%

-1.84%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

36.02%

50.02%

-14.00%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

45.66%

59.36%

-13.70%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

35.68%

44.78%

-9.10%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

35.59%

44.78%

-9.19%

UBUD.DE vs. GDMN - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBUD.DE has a 0.43% expense ratio, which is lower than GDMN's 0.45% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBUD.DE vs. GDMN - Dividend Comparison

UBUD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.59%, less than GDMN's 2.82% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
GDMN
WisdomTree Efficient Gold Plus Gold Miners Strategy Fund
2.82%2.70%9.44%7.69%1.44%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UBUD.DE
UBS ETF (IE) Solactive Global Pure Gold Miners UCITS ETF (USD) Dist
0.59%0.40%0.56%1.74%1.12%1.15%0.44%0.42%0.48%0.46%0.43%1.38%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBUD.DE and GDMN have a correlation of 0.75, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, UBUD.DE is cheaper at 0.43% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

UBUD.DE is cheaper with a 0.43% expense ratio, compared with 0.45% for GDMN.

UBUD.DE is categorized as Precious Metals, while GDMN is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: UBS and WisdomTree. Their fees differ too: 0.43% for UBUD.DE and 0.45% for GDMN.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBUD.DE and GDMN

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer