BCFS.DE vs. S5SD.DE
BCFS.DE (UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc) and S5SD.DE (UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD dis) are both exchange-traded funds - BCFS.DE is a Options Trading fund tracking the US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index, while S5SD.DE is a S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Both are passively managed. A 0.53 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. BCFS.DE charges 0.24%/yr vs 0.12%/yr for S5SD.DE.
Performance
BCFS.DE vs. S5SD.DE - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, BCFS.DE achieves a 4.49% return, which is significantly lower than S5SD.DE's 11.01% return.
BCFS.DE
- 1D
- 0.42%
- 1M
- 1.32%
- YTD
- 4.49%
- 6M
- 5.09%
- 1Y
- —
- 3Y*
- —
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
S5SD.DE
- 1D
- 0.61%
- 1M
- 5.46%
- YTD
- 11.01%
- 6M
- 11.53%
- 1Y
- 28.37%
- 3Y*
- 18.37%
- 5Y*
- 15.39%
- 10Y*
- —
BCFS.DE vs. S5SD.DE - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | |
|---|---|---|
BCFS.DE UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc | 4.49% | 4.64% |
S5SD.DE UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD dis | 11.01% | 9.71% |
Correlation
The correlation between BCFS.DE and S5SD.DE is 0.53, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Aug 5, 2025 | 0.53 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
BCFS.DE vs. S5SD.DE — Risk / Return Rank
BCFS.DE
S5SD.DE
BCFS.DE vs. S5SD.DE - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc (BCFS.DE) and UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD dis (S5SD.DE). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Risk / return metrics aren't available yet — we need at least 12 months of trading data to calculate them.
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| BCFS.DE | S5SD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | — | 2.45 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | 1.00 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 3.09 | 0.81 | +2.28 |
Drawdowns
BCFS.DE vs. S5SD.DE - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum BCFS.DE drawdown since its inception was -2.21%, smaller than the maximum S5SD.DE drawdown of -32.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for BCFS.DE and S5SD.DE.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| BCFS.DE | S5SD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -2.21% | -32.97% | +30.76% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | — | -7.01% | — |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -23.42% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -0.17% | -5.01% | +4.84% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | — | 1.83% | — |
Volatility
BCFS.DE vs. S5SD.DE - Volatility Comparison
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| BCFS.DE | S5SD.DE | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | — | 2.74% | — |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | — | 7.59% | — |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.67% | 11.51% | -7.84% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 15.26% | -11.59% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 3.67% | 17.57% | -13.90% |
BCFS.DE vs. S5SD.DE - Expense Ratio Comparison
BCFS.DE has a 0.24% expense ratio, which is higher than S5SD.DE's 0.12% expense ratio. However, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
BCFS.DE vs. S5SD.DE - Dividend Comparison
BCFS.DE has not paid dividends to shareholders, while S5SD.DE's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 0.63%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
BCFS.DE UBS US Equity Defensive Put Write SF UCITS ETF hEUR Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
S5SD.DE UBS S&P 500 Scored & Screened UCITS ETF USD dis | 0.63% | 0.86% | 0.82% | 1.05% | 1.21% | 0.82% | 1.33% | 0.39% |
Frequently Asked Questions
BCFS.DE and S5SD.DE have a correlation of 0.53, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, S5SD.DE is cheaper at 0.12% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
S5SD.DE is cheaper with a 0.12% expense ratio, compared with 0.24% for BCFS.DE.
BCFS.DE is categorized as Options Trading, while S5SD.DE is S&P 500. BCFS.DE tracks US Equity Defensive Put Write (EUR Hedged) Index, while S5SD.DE tracks S&P 500 Index. Their fees differ too: 0.24% for BCFS.DE and 0.12% for S5SD.DE.
Find the right allocation for BCFS.DE and S5SD.DE
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer