UBT vs. IQQQ

Last updated Jul 15, 2026

UBT (ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury) and IQQQ (ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBT is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (200%), while IQQQ is a Nasdaq-100 fund tracking the Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past year, UBT returned 0.10% vs 26.85% for IQQQ. At a 0.09 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBT charges 0.95%/yr vs 0.55%/yr for IQQQ.

Performance

UBT vs. IQQQ - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBT achieves a -4.99% return, which is significantly lower than IQQQ's 14.90% return.

UBT

• 1D: 0.39%
• 1M: -3.02%
• 6M: -6.32%
• YTD: -4.99%
• 1Y: 0.10%
• 3Y*: -10.50%
• 5Y*: -20.31%
• 10Y*: -9.22%

IQQQ

• 1D: 1.08%
• 1M: -0.58%
• 6M: 12.88%
• YTD: 14.90%
• 1Y: 26.85%
• 3Y*: —
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBT vs. IQQQ - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024
UBT ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury	-4.99%	2.03%	-10.68%
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	14.90%	17.11%	14.82%

Correlation

The correlation between UBT and IQQQ is 0.15, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.15
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 20, 2024	0.09

Return for Risk

UBT vs. IQQQ — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBT

UBT Risk / Return Rank: 9
UBT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 10
UBT Sortino Ratio Rank: 9
UBT Omega Ratio Rank: 9
UBT Calmar Ratio Rank: 9
UBT Martin Ratio Rank: 9

IQQQ

IQQQ Risk / Return Rank: 56
IQQQ Sharpe Ratio Rank: 56
IQQQ Sortino Ratio Rank: 52
IQQQ Omega Ratio Rank: 52
IQQQ Calmar Ratio Rank: 61
IQQQ Martin Ratio Rank: 58

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBT vs. IQQQ - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT) and ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	UBT	IQQQ	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	0.01	1.53	-1.53
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	0.14	2.04	-1.90
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.26	-0.25
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	0.01	2.42	-2.42
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	0.01	7.99	-7.98

UBT vs. IQQQ - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBT Sharpe Ratio is 0.01, which is lower than the IQQQ Sharpe Ratio of 1.53. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBT and IQQQ, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

UBT vs. IQQQ - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBT drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, which is greater than IQQQ's maximum drawdown of -20.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBT and IQQQ.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBT	IQQQ	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-78.90%	-20.41%	-58.49%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-16.86%	-11.13%	-5.73%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-35.81%	—	—
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-72.49%	—	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-78.90%	—	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-77.21%	-3.51%	-73.70%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-32.58%	-3.63%	-28.95%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	7.78%	3.37%	+4.41%

Volatility

UBT vs. IQQQ - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT) is 5.20%, while ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF (IQQQ) has a volatility of 7.33%. This indicates that UBT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than IQQQ based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBT	IQQQ	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	5.20%	7.33%	-2.13%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	13.37%	14.35%	-0.98%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	18.71%	17.61%	+1.10%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	31.18%	19.15%	+12.03%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	29.17%	19.15%	+10.02%

UBT vs. IQQQ - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBT has a 0.95% expense ratio, which is higher than IQQQ's 0.55% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBT vs. IQQQ - Dividend Comparison

UBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.61%, less than IQQQ's 5.20% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
IQQQ ProShares Nasdaq-100 High Income ETF	5.20%	10.34%	7.27%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
UBT ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury	3.61%	4.26%	4.50%	3.54%	0.30%	0.00%	0.26%	1.50%	1.55%	1.37%	0.75%	1.56%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBT and IQQQ in my portfolio?

UBT and IQQQ have a correlation of 0.15, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UBT or IQQQ?

IQQQ has higher volatility (7.33%) compared to UBT (5.20%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBT dropped -78.90% vs IQQQ's -20.41%.

Which ETF is better, UBT or IQQQ?

On 1-year performance, IQQQ leads with 26.85% vs 0.10% for UBT. On fees, IQQQ is cheaper at 0.55% per year. On volatility, UBT has been the lower-risk option at 5.20%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UBT or IQQQ?

Over the 1-year period, IQQQ has performed better with a 26.85% return vs 0.10%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UBT or IQQQ?

IQQQ is cheaper with a 0.55% expense ratio, compared with 0.95% for UBT.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UBT or IQQQ?

IQQQ has the higher dividend yield at 5.20%, compared with 3.61% for UBT.

What is the main difference between UBT and IQQQ?

UBT is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while IQQQ is Nasdaq-100. UBT tracks Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (200%), while IQQQ tracks Nasdaq-100 Daily Covered Call Index. Their fees differ too: 0.95% for UBT and 0.55% for IQQQ.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

IQQQ currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.53 vs 0.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.