UBT vs. FTGC
UBT (ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury) and FTGC (First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund) are both exchange-traded funds - UBT is a Leveraged Bonds fund tracking the Barclays Capital U.S. 20+ Year Treasury Index (200%), while FTGC is a Commodities fund actively managed by First Trust. UBT is passively managed, while FTGC is actively managed. Over the past 10 years, UBT returned -8.46%/yr vs 7.28%/yr for FTGC. At a correlation of -0.12, they often move in opposite directions. Both charge a 0.95% expense ratio.
Performance
UBT vs. FTGC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UBT achieves a -1.00% return, which is significantly lower than FTGC's 20.23% return. Over the past 10 years, UBT has underperformed FTGC with an annualized return of -8.46%, while FTGC has yielded a comparatively higher 7.28% annualized return.
UBT
- 1D
- -1.27%
- 1M
- 4.22%
- YTD
- -1.00%
- 6M
- -1.75%
- 1Y
- 2.54%
- 3Y*
- -10.45%
- 5Y*
- -18.46%
- 10Y*
- -8.46%
FTGC
- 1D
- -0.24%
- 1M
- -6.30%
- YTD
- 20.23%
- 6M
- 20.44%
- 1Y
- 26.86%
- 3Y*
- 14.70%
- 5Y*
- 12.56%
- 10Y*
- 7.28%
UBT vs. FTGC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UBT ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury | -1.00% | 2.03% | -21.81% | -3.68% | -55.54% | -12.14% | 31.87% | 24.46% | -6.54% | 16.12% |
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 20.23% | 14.61% | 9.96% | -5.36% | 17.36% | 27.95% | 2.17% | 6.40% | -12.75% | 2.73% |
Correlation
The correlation between UBT and FTGC is -0.25, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.25 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.10 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 23, 2013 | -0.12 |
The correlation between UBT and FTGC shifts across timeframes, from -0.25 (1 year) to -0.10 (3 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UBT vs. FTGC — Risk / Return Rank
UBT
FTGC
UBT vs. FTGC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT) and First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UBT | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.59 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.00 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.04 | 1.31 | -0.27 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.15 | 2.74 | -2.59 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.34 | 9.43 | -9.09 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UBT vs. FTGC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UBT drawdown since its inception was -78.90%, which is greater than FTGC's maximum drawdown of -59.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBT and FTGC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UBT | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -78.90% | -59.47% | -19.43% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -16.86% | -9.84% | -7.02% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -36.47% | -10.39% | -26.08% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -72.49% | -22.64% | -49.85% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -78.90% | -35.91% | -42.99% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -76.25% | -9.84% | -66.41% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -32.42% | -27.34% | -5.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 7.41% | 2.98% | +4.43% |
Volatility
UBT vs. FTGC - Volatility Comparison
ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury (UBT) has a higher volatility of 4.42% compared to First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund (FTGC) at 2.99%. This indicates that UBT's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than FTGC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UBT | FTGC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 4.42% | 2.99% | +1.43% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 13.07% | 13.17% | -0.10% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 18.91% | 15.69% | +3.22% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 31.23% | 15.86% | +15.37% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 29.32% | 14.71% | +14.61% |
UBT vs. FTGC - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both UBT and FTGC have an expense ratio of 0.95%.
Dividends
UBT vs. FTGC - Dividend Comparison
UBT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.93%, less than FTGC's 15.95% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
FTGC First Trust Global Tactical Commodity Strategy Fund | 15.95% | 17.74% | 3.05% | 3.34% | 10.35% | 7.21% | 0.00% | 0.81% | 0.80% | 1.21% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
UBT ProShares Ultra 20+ Year Treasury | 3.93% | 4.26% | 4.50% | 3.54% | 0.30% | 0.00% | 0.26% | 1.50% | 1.55% | 1.37% | 0.75% | 1.56% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UBT and FTGC have a correlation of -0.25, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UBT has higher volatility (4.42%) compared to FTGC (2.99%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBT dropped -78.90% vs FTGC's -59.47%.
On 10-year performance, FTGC leads with 7.28% vs -8.46% for UBT. Both ETFs have the same 0.95% expense ratio. On volatility, FTGC has been the lower-risk option at 2.99%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 10-year period, FTGC has performed better with a 7.28% return vs -8.46%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
UBT and FTGC have the same expense ratio: 0.95% per year.
FTGC has the higher dividend yield at 15.95%, compared with 3.93% for UBT.
UBT is categorized as Leveraged Bonds, while FTGC is Commodities. They also come from different issuers: ProShares and First Trust.
FTGC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.72 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UBT and FTGC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer