PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBOT vs. GUSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

UBOT vs. GUSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBOT achieves a -2.62% return, which is significantly lower than GUSH's 59.61% return.


UBOT

1D
1.17%
1M
-6.03%
6M
-3.64%
YTD
-2.62%
1Y
7.15%
3Y*
7.92%
5Y*
-9.02%
10Y*
ALL TIME*
-5.68%

GUSH

1D
-8.09%
1M
13.41%
6M
24.52%
YTD
59.61%
1Y
59.24%
3Y*
-0.49%
5Y*
17.52%
10Y*
-36.18%
ALL TIME*
-42.61%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Liquidity Comparison


PositionAvg. Volume Value (2W)Avg. Volume Value (1M)Avg. Volume Value (3M)
$36.78M$35.00M$31.67M
$403.24K$375.59K$557.36K

UBOT vs. GUSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021202020192018
UBOT
Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares
-2.62%13.42%12.02%72.59%-72.45%9.78%80.13%87.34%-71.74%
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
59.61%-19.39%-12.73%-7.23%66.47%129.94%-97.38%-52.68%-75.48%

Correlation

The correlation between UBOT and GUSH is -0.14, meaning they have often moved in opposite directions in the past. This relationship can weaken or reverse as market conditions change.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most.

-0.14

Correlation (3Y)
Balances recent behavior with more history.

0.10

Correlation (5Y)
Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period.

0.25

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 19, 2018

0.35

The correlation between UBOT and GUSH shifts across timeframes, from -0.14 (1 year) to 0.35 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

UBOT vs. GUSH - Sectors Allocation Comparison


Sectors
UBOT
GUSH

Industrials

50.8%
0.7%

Technology

30.8%
0.6%

Healthcare

8.0%

-

Consumer Cyclical

6.2%

-

Communication Services

4.2%

-

Financial Services

0.9%

-

Energy

0.5%
95.1%

Consumer Defensive

0.0%

-

Basic Materials

0.0%
4.3%

Utilities

0.0%

-

Real Estate

-

-

Industrials

UBOT
50.8%
GUSH
0.7%

Technology

UBOT
30.8%
GUSH
0.6%

Healthcare

UBOT
8.0%
GUSH

-

Consumer Cyclical

UBOT
6.2%
GUSH

-

Communication Services

UBOT
4.2%
GUSH

-

Financial Services

UBOT
0.9%
GUSH

-

Energy

UBOT
0.5%
GUSH
95.1%

Consumer Defensive

UBOT
0.0%
GUSH

-

Basic Materials

UBOT
0.0%
GUSH
4.3%

Utilities

UBOT
0.0%
GUSH

-

Real Estate

UBOT

-

GUSH

-

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UBOT vs. GUSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare historical risk-adjusted metric ranks over the past 12 months.

UBOT
UBOT Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
UBOT Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBOT Sortino Ratio Rank: 1616
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBOT Omega Ratio Rank: 1515
Omega Ratio Rank
UBOT Calmar Ratio Rank: 1313
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBOT Martin Ratio Rank: 1313
Martin Ratio Rank

GUSH
GUSH Risk / Return Rank: 3737
Overall Rank
GUSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3636
Sharpe Ratio Rank
GUSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 3737
Sortino Ratio Rank
GUSH Omega Ratio Rank: 3535
Omega Ratio Rank
GUSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 4040
Calmar Ratio Rank
GUSH Martin Ratio Rank: 3434
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) uses a weighted average of the Sharpe, Sortino, Omega, Calmar, and Martin percentile ranks for the trailing 12 months. Higher means stronger historical risk-adjusted performance within the peer group.

UBOT vs. GUSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) and Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UBOTGUSHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.90

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.00

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.19

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.20

1.65

-1.45

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.47

3.69

-3.22

UBOT vs. GUSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBOT Sharpe Ratio is 0.14, which is lower than the GUSH Sharpe Ratio of 1.04. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBOT and GUSH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UBOT vs. GUSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBOT drawdown since its inception was -86.24%, smaller than the maximum GUSH drawdown of -99.98%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBOT and GUSH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UBOTGUSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-86.24%

-99.98%

+13.74%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-36.64%

-36.18%

-0.46%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-51.64%

-63.59%

+11.95%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-82.90%

-73.64%

-9.26%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-99.94%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-52.85%

-99.80%

+46.95%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-49.91%

-92.99%

+43.08%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

15.36%

16.13%

-0.77%

Volatility

UBOT vs. GUSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares (UBOT) is 16.80%, while Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares (GUSH) has a volatility of 19.37%. This indicates that UBOT experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than GUSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UBOTGUSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

16.80%

19.37%

-2.57%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.30%

45.36%

-2.06%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

52.63%

57.19%

-4.56%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

54.11%

67.42%

-13.31%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

63.54%

92.80%

-29.26%

UBOT vs. GUSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBOT has a 1.29% expense ratio, which is higher than GUSH's 1.17% expense ratio.


Dividends

UBOT vs. GUSH - Dividend Comparison

UBOT's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.01%, less than GUSH's 1.37% yield.


PositionTTM2025202420232022202120202019201820172016
GUSH
Direxion Daily S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Bull 2x Shares
1.37%2.60%2.96%3.00%0.47%0.00%0.20%1.68%0.17%0.00%3.26%
UBOT
Direxion Robotics, Artificial Intelligence & Automation Index Bull 3X Shares
1.01%0.78%1.45%0.65%0.00%2.25%15.83%0.55%0.33%0.00%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


UBOT and GUSH have a correlation of -0.14, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

GUSH has higher volatility (19.37%) compared to UBOT (16.80%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBOT dropped -86.24% vs GUSH's -99.98%.

On 5-year performance, GUSH leads with 17.52% vs -9.02% for UBOT. On fees, GUSH is cheaper at 1.17% per year. On volatility, UBOT has been the lower-risk option at 16.80%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Over the 5-year period, GUSH has performed better with a 17.52% return vs -9.02%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

GUSH is cheaper with a 1.17% expense ratio, compared with 1.29% for UBOT.

GUSH has the higher dividend yield at 1.37%, compared with 1.01% for UBOT.

UBOT is categorized as Artificial Intelligence, while GUSH is Leveraged Equities. UBOT tracks Indxx Global Robotics & Artificial Intelligence Thematic Index (300%), while GUSH tracks S&P Oil & Gas Exploration & Production Select Industry Index (300%). Their fees differ too: 1.29% for UBOT and 1.17% for GUSH.

GUSH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.04 vs 0.14), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UBOT and GUSH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer