UBND vs. QQQH

Last updated Jun 4, 2026

UBND (VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF) and QQQH (NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - UBND is a Intermediate Core-Plus Bond fund actively managed by Victory, while QQQH is a Nasdaq-100 fund managed by Neos. Over the past 3 years, UBND returned 4.91%/yr vs 20.71%/yr for QQQH. At a 0.18 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UBND charges 0.40%/yr vs 0.68%/yr for QQQH.

Performance

UBND vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBND achieves a 0.23% return, which is significantly lower than QQQH's 7.91% return.

UBND

• 1D: -0.18%
• 1M: 0.25%
• YTD: 0.23%
• 6M: 0.36%
• 1Y: 5.64%
• 3Y*: 4.91%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

QQQH

• 1D: -0.02%
• 1M: 4.93%
• YTD: 7.91%
• 6M: 7.82%
• 1Y: 20.09%
• 3Y*: 20.71%
• 5Y*: 9.42%
• 10Y*: —

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UBND vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021
UBND VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF	0.23%	7.79%	3.04%	7.37%	-12.72%	0.12%
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	7.91%	14.17%	25.98%	30.96%	-28.35%	4.09%

Correlation

The correlation between UBND and QQQH is 0.22, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.22
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.17
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 6, 2021	0.18

Return for Risk

UBND vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBND

UBND Risk / Return Rank: 45
UBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 46
UBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 49
UBND Omega Ratio Rank: 45
UBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
UBND Martin Ratio Rank: 43

QQQH

QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 62
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 61
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 59
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 63
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 58
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 67

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBND vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UBND	QQQH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	1.60	2.09	-0.49
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.40	2.85	-0.45
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.29	1.39	-0.10
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	2.16	2.90	-0.74
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	6.89	12.60	-5.72
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UBND vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.60, which is comparable to the QQQH Sharpe Ratio of 2.09. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBND and QQQH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UBND	QQQH	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	1.60	2.09	-0.49
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	—	0.72	—
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.16	0.79	-0.62

Drawdowns

UBND vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBND drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum QQQH drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBND and QQQH.

Drawdown Indicators

	UBND	QQQH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-16.53%	-31.24%	+14.71%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-2.62%	-6.96%	+4.34%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-5.07%	-15.18%	+10.11%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-31.24%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-1.34%	-0.02%	-1.32%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-5.45%	-8.27%	+2.82%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	0.82%	1.60%	-0.78%

Volatility

UBND vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) is 1.26%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a volatility of 1.73%. This indicates that UBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UBND	QQQH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	1.26%	1.73%	-0.47%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	2.42%	7.34%	-4.92%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	3.53%	9.67%	-6.14%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	5.80%	13.20%	-7.40%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	5.80%	13.37%	-7.57%

UBND vs. QQQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQH's 0.68% expense ratio.

Dividends

UBND vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

UBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.77%, less than QQQH's 8.74% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019
QQQH NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF	8.74%	8.86%	7.53%	7.18%	9.05%	7.77%	7.48%	0.65%
UBND VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF	4.77%	4.56%	4.63%	4.37%	3.28%	0.28%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both UBND and QQQH in my portfolio?

UBND and QQQH have a correlation of 0.22, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, UBND or QQQH?

QQQH has higher volatility (1.73%) compared to UBND (1.26%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UBND dropped -16.53% vs QQQH's -31.24%.

Which ETF is better, UBND or QQQH?

On 3-year performance, QQQH leads with 20.71% vs 4.91% for UBND. On fees, UBND is cheaper at 0.40% per year. On volatility, UBND has been the lower-risk option at 1.26%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, UBND or QQQH?

Over the 3-year period, QQQH has performed better with a 20.71% return vs 4.91%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, UBND or QQQH?

UBND is cheaper with a 0.40% expense ratio, compared with 0.68% for QQQH.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, UBND or QQQH?

QQQH has the higher dividend yield at 8.74%, compared with 4.77% for UBND.

What is the main difference between UBND and QQQH?

UBND is categorized as Intermediate Core-Plus Bond, while QQQH is Nasdaq-100. They also come from different issuers: Victory and Neos. Their fees differ too: 0.40% for UBND and 0.68% for QQQH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

QQQH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.09 vs 1.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.