PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UBND vs. QQQH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UBND vs. QQQH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UBND vs. QQQH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
UBND
VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF
-0.11%7.79%3.04%7.37%-12.72%0.12%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
-2.89%14.17%25.98%30.96%-28.35%4.09%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UBND achieves a -0.11% return, which is significantly higher than QQQH's -2.89% return.


UBND

1D
0.05%
1M
-1.30%
YTD
-0.11%
6M
1.03%
1Y
4.58%
3Y*
4.73%
5Y*
10Y*

QQQH

1D
0.61%
1M
-2.69%
YTD
-2.89%
6M
-1.20%
1Y
15.34%
3Y*
19.08%
5Y*
7.57%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UBND vs. QQQH - Expense Ratio Comparison

UBND has a 0.40% expense ratio, which is lower than QQQH's 0.68% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UBND vs. QQQH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UBND
UBND Risk / Return Rank: 5858
Overall Rank
UBND Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6262
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UBND Sortino Ratio Rank: 6060
Sortino Ratio Rank
UBND Omega Ratio Rank: 5252
Omega Ratio Rank
UBND Calmar Ratio Rank: 6464
Calmar Ratio Rank
UBND Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

QQQH
QQQH Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
QQQH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QQQH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6161
Sortino Ratio Rank
QQQH Omega Ratio Rank: 6363
Omega Ratio Rank
QQQH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6767
Calmar Ratio Rank
QQQH Martin Ratio Rank: 7575
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UBND vs. QQQH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) and NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UBNDQQQHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.15

1.05

+0.10

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.63

1.61

+0.02

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.21

1.24

-0.03

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.78

1.78

+0.01

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

5.37

8.30

-2.93

UBND vs. QQQH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UBND Sharpe Ratio is 1.15, which is comparable to the QQQH Sharpe Ratio of 1.05. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UBND and QQQH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UBNDQQQHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.15

1.05

+0.10

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.57

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.15

0.66

-0.51

Correlation

The correlation between UBND and QQQH is 0.17, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.


Dividends

UBND vs. QQQH - Dividend Comparison

UBND's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.66%, less than QQQH's 9.43% yield.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
UBND
VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF
4.66%4.56%4.63%4.37%3.28%0.28%0.00%0.00%
QQQH
NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF
9.43%8.86%7.53%7.18%9.05%7.77%7.48%0.65%

Drawdowns

UBND vs. QQQH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UBND drawdown since its inception was -16.53%, smaller than the maximum QQQH drawdown of -31.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UBND and QQQH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UBNDQQQHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-16.53%

-31.24%

+14.71%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-2.64%

-8.87%

+6.23%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-31.24%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-1.68%

-4.37%

+2.69%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-5.60%

-8.48%

+2.88%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.88%

1.90%

-1.02%

Volatility

UBND vs. QQQH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for VictoryShares Core Plus Intermediate Bond ETF (UBND) is 1.51%, while NEOS Nasdaq-100 Hedged Equity Income ETF (QQQH) has a volatility of 4.49%. This indicates that UBND experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QQQH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UBNDQQQHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.51%

4.49%

-2.98%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

2.33%

8.37%

-6.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

4.00%

14.74%

-10.74%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

5.87%

13.40%

-7.53%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

5.87%

13.51%

-7.64%