UB74.L vs. INXG.L
UB74.L (UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis) and INXG.L (iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - UB74.L tracks the Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index while INXG.L tracks the Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 10 years, UB74.L returned 2.42%/yr vs -1.18%/yr for INXG.L. At a 0.11 correlation, their price movements are largely independent. UB74.L charges 0.05%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for INXG.L.
Performance
UB74.L vs. INXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
UB74.L is traded in GBp, while INXG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the INXG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UB74.L achieves a 0.66% return, which is significantly higher than INXG.L's 0.04% return. Over the past 10 years, UB74.L has outperformed INXG.L with an annualized return of 2.42%, while INXG.L has yielded a comparatively lower -1.18% annualized return.
UB74.L
- 1D
- 0.12%
- 1M
- 1.13%
- YTD
- 0.66%
- 6M
- 0.25%
- 1Y
- 4.37%
- 3Y*
- 1.43%
- 5Y*
- 2.86%
- 10Y*
- 2.42%
INXG.L
- 1D
- 0.44%
- 1M
- 1.08%
- YTD
- 0.04%
- 6M
- -0.73%
- 1Y
- 3.31%
- 3Y*
- -0.63%
- 5Y*
- -8.26%
- 10Y*
- -1.18%
UB74.L vs. INXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UB74.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 0.66% | -2.06% | 5.76% | -1.65% | 7.62% | 0.57% | -0.46% | 0.26% | 7.13% | -8.67% |
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF | 0.04% | 1.10% | -8.66% | 0.16% | -34.27% | 4.08% | 11.08% | 6.27% | -0.49% | 2.21% |
Correlation
The correlation between UB74.L and INXG.L is -0.21, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.21 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | -0.07 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.01 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.11 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since May 14, 2013 | 0.11 |
The correlation between UB74.L and INXG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.21 (1 year) to 0.11 (10 years), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UB74.L vs. INXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
UB74.L
INXG.L
UB74.L vs. INXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB74.L) and iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UB74.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.38 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.55 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.12 | 1.06 | +0.06 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.94 | 0.50 | +0.45 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 2.39 | 1.08 | +1.31 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UB74.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.71 | 0.33 | +0.38 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.35 | -0.41 | +0.77 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.26 | -0.07 | +0.33 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.27 | -0.71 | +0.98 |
Drawdowns
UB74.L vs. INXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UB74.L drawdown since its inception was -18.81%, smaller than the maximum INXG.L drawdown of -99.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UB74.L and INXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UB74.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -18.81% | -99.05% | +80.24% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -4.61% | -6.62% | +2.01% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -8.93% | -15.04% | +6.11% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -16.33% | -50.87% | +34.54% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -18.81% | -50.87% | +32.06% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -7.81% | -98.31% | +90.50% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -8.27% | -97.27% | +89.00% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 1.82% | 3.06% | -1.24% |
Volatility
UB74.L vs. INXG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis (UB74.L) is 1.70%, while iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that UB74.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UB74.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 1.70% | 3.49% | -1.79% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 4.49% | 7.26% | -2.77% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 6.14% | 9.89% | -3.75% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 8.08% | 20.07% | -11.99% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 9.27% | 17.47% | -8.20% |
UB74.L vs. INXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
UB74.L has a 0.05% expense ratio, which is lower than INXG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
UB74.L vs. INXG.L - Dividend Comparison
UB74.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.69%, less than INXG.L's 7.56% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF | 7.56% | 7.23% | 5.77% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 1.36% | 1.95% | 1.28% | 0.65% | 1.94% |
UB74.L UBS ETF (LU) Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond UCITS ETF (USD) A-dis | 3.69% | 4.94% | 3.67% | 2.23% | 0.41% | 0.36% | 1.68% | 2.28% | 1.10% | 0.65% | 0.62% | 0.41% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UB74.L and INXG.L have a correlation of -0.21, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, UB74.L is cheaper at 0.05% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
UB74.L is cheaper with a 0.05% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for INXG.L.
UB74.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index, while INXG.L tracks Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: UBS and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.05% for UB74.L and 0.10% for INXG.L.
Find the right allocation for UB74.L and INXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer