UAVS vs. SPYM
UAVS (AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.) is a stock, while SPYM (State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF) is S&P 500 fund tracking the S&P 500 Index. Over the past 5 years, UAVS returned -61.63%/yr vs 13.59%/yr for SPYM. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UAVS vs. SPYM - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAVS achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than SPYM's 9.79% return.
UAVS
- 1D
- -4.21%
- 1M
- -11.50%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- -14.84%
- 1Y
- -22.18%
- 3Y*
- -42.10%
- 5Y*
- -61.63%
- 10Y*
- —
SPYM
- 1D
- -0.32%
- 1M
- 0.12%
- YTD
- 9.79%
- 6M
- 9.30%
- 1Y
- 26.75%
- 3Y*
- 21.36%
- 5Y*
- 13.59%
- 10Y*
- 15.78%
UAVS vs. SPYM - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAVS AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. | 10.92% | -76.55% | 65.40% | -70.03% | -77.71% | -73.83% | 1,233.33% | -20.35% | 213.89% |
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 9.79% | 17.79% | 25.00% | 26.24% | -18.09% | 28.78% | 18.49% | 31.99% | -2.10% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAVS and SPYM is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAVS vs. SPYM — Risk / Return Rank
UAVS
SPYM
UAVS vs. SPYM - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS) and State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UAVS | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.34 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.15 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.39 | -0.31 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 3.02 | -3.32 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 13.57 | -14.00 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UAVS vs. SPYM - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAVS drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than SPYM's maximum drawdown of -54.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAVS and SPYM.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAVS | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -54.46% | -45.51% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.69% | -8.90% | -63.79% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.16% | -18.72% | -79.44% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.92% | -24.48% | -75.44% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.87% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.71% | -1.73% | -97.98% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.79% | -7.14% | -80.65% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.48% | 1.98% | +50.50% |
Volatility
UAVS vs. SPYM - Volatility Comparison
AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS) has a higher volatility of 22.76% compared to State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF (SPYM) at 4.61%. This indicates that UAVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than SPYM based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAVS | SPYM | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.76% | 4.61% | +18.15% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.87% | 9.74% | +72.13% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.44% | 12.39% | +121.05% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,116.14% | 16.89% | +2,099.25% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,938.58% | 18.05% | +1,920.53% |
Dividends
UAVS vs. SPYM - Dividend Comparison
UAVS has not paid dividends to shareholders, while SPYM's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.28%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
SPYM State Street SPDR Portfolio S&P 500 ETF | 1.28% | 1.13% | 1.28% | 1.44% | 1.69% | 1.25% | 1.54% | 1.79% | 2.23% | 1.75% | 1.97% | 1.98% |
UAVS AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UAVS and SPYM have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UAVS has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to SPYM (4.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAVS dropped -99.97% vs SPYM's -54.46%.
SPYM currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.17 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAVS and SPYM
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer