UAVS vs. RCAT
UAVS (AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.) and RCAT (Red Cat Holdings, Inc.) are both stocks. UAVS operates in Aerospace & Defense (Industrials), while RCAT operates in Software - Application (Technology). Over the past 5 years, UAVS returned -59.09%/yr vs 43.12%/yr for RCAT. At a 0.19 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UAVS vs. RCAT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAVS achieves a 41.31% return, which is significantly lower than RCAT's 88.52% return.
UAVS
- 1D
- -0.86%
- 1M
- 8.49%
- YTD
- 41.31%
- 6M
- -3.36%
- 1Y
- -10.85%
- 3Y*
- -46.78%
- 5Y*
- -59.09%
- 10Y*
- —
RCAT
- 1D
- 0.74%
- 1M
- 33.13%
- YTD
- 88.52%
- 6M
- 114.80%
- 1Y
- 131.42%
- 3Y*
- 148.71%
- 5Y*
- 43.12%
- 10Y*
- —
UAVS vs. RCAT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAVS AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. | 41.31% | -76.55% | 65.40% | -70.03% | -77.71% | -73.83% | 1,233.33% | -20.35% | 169.05% |
RCAT Red Cat Holdings, Inc. | 88.52% | -38.29% | 1,360.23% | -6.38% | -54.81% | -30.67% | 172.73% | -38.89% | -86.84% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAVS and RCAT is 0.49, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.31 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 27, 2018 | 0.19 |
Over the past year, UAVS and RCAT have become more correlated (0.49) than their long-term average of 0.19, meaning their price movements have been converging.
Fundamentals
UAVS:
-$0.81
RCAT:
-$0.78
UAVS:
2.17
RCAT:
31.07
UAVS:
$12.64M
RCAT:
$52.98M
UAVS:
$6.38M
RCAT:
$2.86M
UAVS:
$1.38M
RCAT:
-$79.24M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAVS vs. RCAT — Risk / Return Rank
UAVS
RCAT
UAVS vs. RCAT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS) and Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UAVS | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.08 | 1.10 | -1.18 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.03 | 2.14 | -1.11 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.11 | 1.24 | -0.13 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.63 | 2.52 | -1.89 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.90 | 5.09 | -4.19 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UAVS | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.08 | 1.10 | -1.18 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.03 | 0.38 | -0.41 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.01 | -0.05 | +0.05 |
Drawdowns
UAVS vs. RCAT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAVS drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, roughly equal to the maximum RCAT drawdown of -99.76%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAVS and RCAT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAVS | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -99.76% | -0.21% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.69% | -60.08% | -12.61% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.77% | -67.16% | -31.61% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.92% | -92.25% | -7.67% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.63% | -91.04% | -8.59% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.76% | -95.53% | +7.77% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 50.60% | 29.72% | +20.88% |
Volatility
UAVS vs. RCAT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS) is 18.88%, while Red Cat Holdings, Inc. (RCAT) has a volatility of 37.55%. This indicates that UAVS experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than RCAT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAVS | RCAT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 18.88% | 37.55% | -18.67% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 83.52% | 83.03% | +0.49% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 152.28% | 120.67% | +31.61% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,115.29% | 114.89% | +2,000.40% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,945.14% | 239.64% | +1,705.50% |
Dividends
UAVS vs. RCAT - Dividend Comparison
Neither UAVS nor RCAT has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
UAVS vs. RCAT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. and Red Cat Holdings, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
UAVS and RCAT have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
RCAT has higher volatility (37.55%) compared to UAVS (18.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAVS dropped -99.97% vs RCAT's -99.76%.
RCAT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.10 vs -0.08), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAVS and RCAT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer