UAVS vs. ^GSPC
UAVS (AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc.) is a stock, while ^GSPC (S&P 500 Index) is an index. Over the past 5 years, UAVS returned -61.63%/yr vs 11.99%/yr for ^GSPC. At a 0.27 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
UAVS vs. ^GSPC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAVS achieves a 10.92% return, which is significantly higher than ^GSPC's 9.16% return.
UAVS
- 1D
- -4.21%
- 1M
- -11.50%
- YTD
- 10.92%
- 6M
- -14.84%
- 1Y
- -22.18%
- 3Y*
- -42.10%
- 5Y*
- -61.63%
- 10Y*
- —
^GSPC
- 1D
- -0.37%
- 1M
- -0.01%
- YTD
- 9.16%
- 6M
- 8.64%
- 1Y
- 25.22%
- 3Y*
- 19.78%
- 5Y*
- 11.99%
- 10Y*
- 13.88%
UAVS vs. ^GSPC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAVS AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. | 10.92% | -76.55% | 65.40% | -70.03% | -77.71% | -73.83% | 1,233.33% | -20.35% | 213.89% |
^GSPC S&P 500 Index | 9.16% | 16.39% | 23.31% | 24.23% | -19.44% | 26.89% | 16.26% | 28.88% | -3.15% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAVS and ^GSPC is 0.34, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.34 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.26 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.33 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Mar 26, 2018 | 0.27 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAVS vs. ^GSPC — Risk / Return Rank
UAVS
^GSPC
UAVS vs. ^GSPC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS) and S&P 500 Index (^GSPC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UAVS | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -2.20 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -1.97 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.37 | -0.28 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.31 | 2.78 | -3.09 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.42 | 12.44 | -12.86 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UAVS vs. ^GSPC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAVS drawdown since its inception was -99.97%, which is greater than ^GSPC's maximum drawdown of -56.78%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAVS and ^GSPC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAVS | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -99.97% | -56.78% | -43.19% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -72.69% | -9.10% | -63.59% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -98.16% | -18.90% | -79.26% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -99.92% | -25.43% | -74.49% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -33.92% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -99.71% | -1.80% | -97.91% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -87.79% | -10.71% | -77.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 52.48% | 2.03% | +50.45% |
Volatility
UAVS vs. ^GSPC - Volatility Comparison
AgEagle Aerial Systems, Inc. (UAVS) has a higher volatility of 22.76% compared to S&P 500 Index (^GSPC) at 4.67%. This indicates that UAVS's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ^GSPC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAVS | ^GSPC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 22.76% | 4.67% | +18.09% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 81.87% | 9.84% | +72.03% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 133.44% | 12.50% | +120.94% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 2,116.14% | 16.99% | +2,099.15% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 1,938.58% | 18.11% | +1,920.47% |
Frequently Asked Questions
UAVS and ^GSPC have a correlation of 0.34, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UAVS has higher volatility (22.76%) compared to ^GSPC (4.67%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAVS dropped -99.97% vs ^GSPC's -56.78%.
^GSPC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.03 vs -0.17), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAVS and ^GSPC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer