PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAUG vs. QFLR
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

UAUG vs. QFLR - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

UAUG vs. QFLR - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
UAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August
-1.08%12.42%13.41%
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
-2.22%17.27%16.64%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAUG achieves a -1.08% return, which is significantly higher than QFLR's -2.22% return.


UAUG

1D
0.37%
1M
-1.82%
YTD
-1.08%
6M
0.37%
1Y
13.67%
3Y*
13.45%
5Y*
6.91%
10Y*

QFLR

1D
0.66%
1M
-2.97%
YTD
-2.22%
6M
0.78%
1Y
23.46%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


UAUG vs. QFLR - Expense Ratio Comparison

UAUG has a 0.79% expense ratio, which is lower than QFLR's 0.89% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

UAUG vs. QFLR — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAUG
UAUG Risk / Return Rank: 8181
Overall Rank
UAUG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7676
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAUG Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAUG Omega Ratio Rank: 8585
Omega Ratio Rank
UAUG Calmar Ratio Rank: 7777
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAUG Martin Ratio Rank: 8787
Martin Ratio Rank

QFLR
QFLR Risk / Return Rank: 8989
Overall Rank
QFLR Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QFLR Sortino Ratio Rank: 8989
Sortino Ratio Rank
QFLR Omega Ratio Rank: 8686
Omega Ratio Rank
QFLR Calmar Ratio Rank: 9090
Calmar Ratio Rank
QFLR Martin Ratio Rank: 9292
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAUG vs. QFLR - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG) and Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UAUGQFLRDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.46

1.91

-0.46

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

2.15

2.62

-0.48

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.35

1.36

-0.01

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

2.23

3.17

-0.94

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

11.11

13.59

-2.49

UAUG vs. QFLR - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAUG Sharpe Ratio is 1.46, which is comparable to the QFLR Sharpe Ratio of 1.91. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAUG and QFLR, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UAUGQFLRDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.46

1.91

-0.46

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.88

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.82

1.11

-0.29

Correlation

The correlation between UAUG and QFLR is 0.83, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

UAUG vs. QFLR - Dividend Comparison

Neither UAUG nor QFLR has paid dividends to shareholders.


TTM2025202420232022202120202019
UAUG
Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.83%
QFLR
Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF
0.00%0.02%0.03%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

UAUG vs. QFLR - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAUG drawdown since its inception was -13.91%, roughly equal to the maximum QFLR drawdown of -13.97%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAUG and QFLR.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


UAUGQFLRDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-13.91%

-13.97%

+0.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-6.31%

-7.61%

+1.30%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-13.91%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-2.16%

-4.77%

+2.61%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.41%

-2.61%

+0.20%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

1.27%

1.77%

-0.50%

Volatility

UAUG vs. QFLR - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Innovator U.S. Equity Ultra Buffer ETF - August (UAUG) is 2.86%, while Innovator Nasdaq-100 Managed Floor ETF (QFLR) has a volatility of 4.97%. This indicates that UAUG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than QFLR based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


UAUGQFLRDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

2.86%

4.97%

-2.11%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.32%

9.49%

-5.17%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

9.43%

12.32%

-2.89%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

7.85%

12.89%

-5.04%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

8.80%

12.89%

-4.09%