PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAMY vs. LYSDY
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UAMY vs. LYSDY - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAMY achieves a 40.24% return, which is significantly lower than LYSDY's 52.00% return. Over the past 10 years, UAMY has underperformed LYSDY with an annualized return of 39.91%, while LYSDY has yielded a comparatively higher 74.15% annualized return.


UAMY

1D
-3.96%
1M
-29.39%
YTD
40.24%
6M
25.71%
1Y
133.11%
3Y*
174.60%
5Y*
49.67%
10Y*
39.91%

LYSDY

1D
2.53%
1M
-12.53%
YTD
52.00%
6M
49.64%
1Y
118.23%
3Y*
33.48%
5Y*
23.19%
10Y*
74.15%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAMY vs. LYSDY - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UAMY
United States Antimony Corporation
40.24%183.62%610.84%-48.86%-2.19%-4.64%35.58%-33.62%81.25%27.49%
LYSDY
Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR
52.00%109.37%-18.22%-8.17%-29.21%144.41%79.88%50.87%489.58%258.76%

Correlation

The correlation between UAMY and LYSDY is 0.43, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.43

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.25

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.20

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.11

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since May 17, 2010

0.08

Over the past year, UAMY and LYSDY have become more correlated (0.43) than their long-term average of 0.08, meaning their price movements have been converging.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UAMY:

$996.95M

LYSDY:

$12.36B

EPS

UAMY:

-$0.13

LYSDY:

A$0.14

PS Ratio

UAMY:

23.26

LYSDY:

14.42

PB Ratio

UAMY:

7.56

LYSDY:

5.23

Total Revenue (TTM)

UAMY:

$39.04M

LYSDY:

A$1.19B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UAMY:

$4.34M

LYSDY:

A$301.27M

EBITDA (TTM)

UAMY:

-$15.23M

LYSDY:

A$236.57M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UAMY vs. LYSDY — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAMY
UAMY Risk / Return Rank: 7474
Overall Rank
UAMY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 7474
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAMY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8080
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAMY Omega Ratio Rank: 7474
Omega Ratio Rank
UAMY Calmar Ratio Rank: 7474
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAMY Martin Ratio Rank: 6969
Martin Ratio Rank

LYSDY
LYSDY Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
LYSDY Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8888
Sharpe Ratio Rank
LYSDY Sortino Ratio Rank: 8181
Sortino Ratio Rank
LYSDY Omega Ratio Rank: 8080
Omega Ratio Rank
LYSDY Calmar Ratio Rank: 8181
Calmar Ratio Rank
LYSDY Martin Ratio Rank: 7878
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAMY vs. LYSDY - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UAMYLYSDYDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.82

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.14

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.23

1.29

-0.05

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.80

2.56

-0.76

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.10

5.33

-2.24

UAMY vs. LYSDY - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAMY Sharpe Ratio is 1.01, which is lower than the LYSDY Sharpe Ratio of 1.83. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAMY and LYSDY, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UAMY vs. LYSDY - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAMY drawdown since its inception was -96.44%, roughly equal to the maximum LYSDY drawdown of -99.93%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAMY and LYSDY.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UAMYLYSDYDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-96.44%

-99.93%

+3.49%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-74.30%

-46.39%

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-74.30%

-46.39%

-27.91%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-80.46%

-58.25%

-22.21%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-89.76%

-72.35%

-17.41%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-59.70%

-54.54%

-5.16%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-66.41%

-84.48%

+18.07%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

43.23%

22.25%

+20.98%

Volatility

UAMY vs. LYSDY - Volatility Comparison

United States Antimony Corporation (UAMY) has a higher volatility of 30.55% compared to Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR (LYSDY) at 17.37%. This indicates that UAMY's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LYSDY based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UAMYLYSDYDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

30.55%

17.37%

+13.18%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

93.03%

43.70%

+49.33%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

132.02%

64.99%

+67.03%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

95.07%

50.64%

+44.43%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

101.02%

278.55%

-177.53%

Dividends

UAMY vs. LYSDY - Dividend Comparison

Neither UAMY nor LYSDY has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

UAMY vs. LYSDY - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between United States Antimony Corporation and Lynas Rare Earths Ltd ADR. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.00100.00M200.00M300.00M400.00M500.00M600.00M20222023202420252026
6.78M
406.10M
(UAMY) Total Revenue
(LYSDY) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UAMY values in USD, LYSDY values in AUD

Frequently Asked Questions


UAMY and LYSDY have a correlation of 0.43, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UAMY has higher volatility (30.55%) compared to LYSDY (17.37%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAMY dropped -96.44% vs LYSDY's -99.93%.

LYSDY currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.83 vs 1.01), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UAMY and LYSDY

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer