PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAA vs. BIDU
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UAA vs. BIDU - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a 21.73% return, which is significantly higher than BIDU's -11.40% return. Over the past 10 years, UAA has underperformed BIDU with an annualized return of -16.61%, while BIDU has yielded a comparatively higher -3.23% annualized return.


UAA

1D
0.67%
1M
18.16%
YTD
21.73%
6M
39.72%
1Y
-8.33%
3Y*
-7.28%
5Y*
-22.39%
10Y*
-16.61%

BIDU

1D
-0.29%
1M
-14.45%
YTD
-11.40%
6M
-7.39%
1Y
34.62%
3Y*
-6.71%
5Y*
-9.21%
10Y*
-3.23%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAA vs. BIDU - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
21.73%-39.98%-5.80%-13.48%-52.05%23.41%-20.51%22.24%22.45%-50.33%
BIDU
Baidu, Inc.
-11.40%54.98%-29.20%4.12%-23.13%-31.19%71.08%-20.30%-32.28%42.45%

Correlation

The correlation between UAA and BIDU is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.19

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.25

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.27

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 18, 2005

0.30

The correlation between UAA and BIDU shifts across timeframes, from 0.13 (1 year) to 0.30 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UAA:

$2.58B

BIDU:

$40.00B

EPS

UAA:

-$1.16

BIDU:

CN¥3.78

PS Ratio

UAA:

0.52

BIDU:

2.09

PB Ratio

UAA:

1.82

BIDU:

1.01

Total Revenue (TTM)

UAA:

$4.97B

BIDU:

CN¥128.51B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UAA:

$2.26B

BIDU:

CN¥54.09B

EBITDA (TTM)

UAA:

-$36.44M

BIDU:

CN¥23.17B

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UAA vs. BIDU — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAA
UAA Risk / Return Rank: 3434
Overall Rank
UAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 3434
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 3434
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAA Omega Ratio Rank: 3434
Omega Ratio Rank
UAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 3535
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAA Martin Ratio Rank: 3636
Martin Ratio Rank

BIDU
BIDU Risk / Return Rank: 6262
Overall Rank
BIDU Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6464
Sharpe Ratio Rank
BIDU Sortino Ratio Rank: 6363
Sortino Ratio Rank
BIDU Omega Ratio Rank: 6060
Omega Ratio Rank
BIDU Calmar Ratio Rank: 6363
Calmar Ratio Rank
BIDU Martin Ratio Rank: 6262
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAA vs. BIDU - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Baidu, Inc. (BIDU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


UAABIDUDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.84

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-1.20

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.01

1.15

-0.14

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

-0.27

0.93

-1.20

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

-0.42

2.00

-2.42

UAA vs. BIDU - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAA Sharpe Ratio is -0.21, which is lower than the BIDU Sharpe Ratio of 0.63. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAA and BIDU, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

UAA vs. BIDU - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, which is greater than BIDU's maximum drawdown of -77.47%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and BIDU.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UAABIDUDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.99%

-77.47%

-14.52%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.42%

-34.41%

-9.01%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.53%

-50.73%

-11.80%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.53%

-63.13%

-21.40%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.43%

-77.47%

-12.96%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-88.38%

-65.94%

-22.44%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.82%

-35.56%

-10.26%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.44%

15.96%

+11.48%

Volatility

UAA vs. BIDU - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) is 11.61%, while Baidu, Inc. (BIDU) has a volatility of 14.89%. This indicates that UAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than BIDU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UAABIDUDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

11.61%

14.89%

-3.28%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.37%

35.91%

+7.46%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.87%

50.52%

+4.35%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.74%

51.93%

+0.81%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.12%

46.30%

+5.82%

Dividends

UAA vs. BIDU - Dividend Comparison

Neither UAA nor BIDU has paid dividends to shareholders.


Tickers have no history of dividend payments

Financials

UAA vs. BIDU - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Baidu, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


0.005.00B10.00B15.00B20.00B25.00B30.00B35.00B20222023202420252026
1.17B
31.88B
(UAA) Total Revenue
(BIDU) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. UAA values in USD, BIDU values in CNY

UAA vs. BIDU - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Under Armour, Inc. and Baidu, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
42.0%
38.9%
Portfolio components
UAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 492.04M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.

BIDU - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a gross profit of 12.41B and revenue of 31.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 38.9%.

UAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

BIDU - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported an operating income of 3.17B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.0%.

UAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.

BIDU - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Baidu, Inc. reported a net income of 3.42B and revenue of 31.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.7%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UAA and BIDU have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

BIDU has higher volatility (14.89%) compared to UAA (11.61%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAA dropped -91.99% vs BIDU's -77.47%.

BIDU currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.63 vs -0.21), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UAA and BIDU

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer