PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
UAA vs. ASO
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

UAA vs. ASO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (ASO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a 9.66% return, which is significantly higher than ASO's 3.96% return.


UAA

1D
0.37%
1M
-10.36%
YTD
9.66%
6M
17.46%
1Y
-16.67%
3Y*
-11.42%
5Y*
-24.16%
10Y*
-17.30%

ASO

1D
0.80%
1M
0.04%
YTD
3.96%
6M
4.18%
1Y
22.44%
3Y*
1.15%
5Y*
7.63%
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

UAA vs. ASO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
9.66%-39.98%-5.80%-13.48%-52.05%23.41%42.37%
ASO
Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.
3.96%-12.23%-12.18%26.44%20.55%111.77%59.58%

Correlation

The correlation between UAA and ASO is 0.41, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.41

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.41

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.50

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Oct 5, 2020

0.47

Fundamentals

Market Cap

UAA:

$2.32B

ASO:

$3.50B

EPS

UAA:

-$1.16

ASO:

$5.56

PS Ratio

UAA:

0.47

ASO:

0.58

PB Ratio

UAA:

1.64

ASO:

1.61

Total Revenue (TTM)

UAA:

$4.97B

ASO:

$6.05B

Gross Profit (TTM)

UAA:

$2.26B

ASO:

$2.11B

EBITDA (TTM)

UAA:

-$36.44M

ASO:

$512.18M

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

UAA vs. ASO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAA
UAA Risk / Return Rank: 2828
Overall Rank
UAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2828
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 2828
Sortino Ratio Rank
UAA Omega Ratio Rank: 2828
Omega Ratio Rank
UAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
UAA Martin Ratio Rank: 2929
Martin Ratio Rank

ASO
ASO Risk / Return Rank: 5656
Overall Rank
ASO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5858
Sharpe Ratio Rank
ASO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5454
Sortino Ratio Rank
ASO Omega Ratio Rank: 5151
Omega Ratio Rank
ASO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5858
Calmar Ratio Rank
ASO Martin Ratio Rank: 6161
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAA vs. ASO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (ASO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


UAAASODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

-0.31

0.52

-0.83

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

-0.09

1.02

-1.11

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

0.99

1.12

-0.13

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

-0.39

0.85

-1.24

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

-0.62

2.13

-2.75

UAA vs. ASO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAA Sharpe Ratio is -0.31, which is lower than the ASO Sharpe Ratio of 0.52. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAA and ASO, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


UAAASODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.31

0.52

-0.83

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

-0.46

0.17

-0.63

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.33

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.05

0.61

-0.56

Drawdowns

UAA vs. ASO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, which is greater than ASO's maximum drawdown of -54.17%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and ASO.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


UAAASODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-91.99%

-54.17%

-37.82%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-43.42%

-26.42%

-17.00%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-62.53%

-54.17%

-8.36%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-84.53%

-54.17%

-30.36%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-90.43%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-89.53%

-29.64%

-59.89%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-45.71%

-19.22%

-26.49%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

27.01%

10.55%

+16.46%

Volatility

UAA vs. ASO - Volatility Comparison

Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) has a higher volatility of 22.85% compared to Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. (ASO) at 12.40%. This indicates that UAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than ASO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


UAAASODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

22.85%

12.40%

+10.45%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

43.29%

30.82%

+12.47%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

54.60%

43.42%

+11.18%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

52.72%

46.23%

+6.49%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

52.11%

46.90%

+5.21%

Dividends

UAA vs. ASO - Dividend Comparison

UAA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while ASO's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.04%.


PositionTTM2025202420232022
ASO
Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.
1.04%1.04%0.76%0.55%0.57%
UAA
Under Armour, Inc.
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%

Financials

UAA vs. ASO - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


1.20B1.40B1.60B1.80B20222023202420252026
1.17B
1.72B
(UAA) Total Revenue
(ASO) Total Revenue
Values in USD except per share items

UAA vs. ASO - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Under Armour, Inc. and Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

Gross Margin
Operating Margin
Net Margin
Quarterly
Annual

30.0%35.0%40.0%45.0%50.0%20222023202420252026
42.0%
33.6%
Portfolio components
UAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 492.04M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.

ASO - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. reported a gross profit of 576.60M and revenue of 1.72B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 33.6%.

UAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.

ASO - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. reported an operating income of 170.15M and revenue of 1.72B, resulting in an operating margin of 9.9%.

UAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.

ASO - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Academy Sports and Outdoors, Inc. reported a net income of 133.69M and revenue of 1.72B, resulting in a net margin of 7.8%.


Frequently Asked Questions


UAA and ASO have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

UAA has higher volatility (22.85%) compared to ASO (12.40%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAA dropped -91.99% vs ASO's -54.17%.

ASO currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.52 vs -0.31), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for UAA and ASO

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer