UAA vs. LULU

In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a -18.96% return, which is significantly lower than LULU's -17.19% return. Over the past 10 years, UAA has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of -16.40%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 18.14% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UAA Sharpe Ratio is -0.06, which is lower than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of 0.10. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAA and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither UAA nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -90.81%, roughly equal to the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.26%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and LULU.

Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) has a higher volatility of 12.32% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 11.73%. This indicates that UAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.