UAA vs. LULU
Compare and contrast key facts about Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UAA or LULU.
Key characteristics
| UAA | LULU | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | 10.13% | -39.66% |
| 1Y Return | 34.82% | -24.12% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -26.93% | -13.14% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -11.25% | 8.63% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -12.16% | 21.78% |
| Sharpe Ratio | 0.56 | -0.70 |
| Sortino Ratio | 1.30 | -0.79 |
| Omega Ratio | 1.17 | 0.89 |
| Calmar Ratio | 0.35 | -0.45 |
| Martin Ratio | 1.54 | -0.73 |
| Ulcer Index | 19.72% | 33.71% |
| Daily Std Dev | 54.60% | 35.34% |
| Max Drawdown | -88.15% | -92.24% |
| Current Drawdown | -82.00% | -39.66% |
Fundamentals
| UAA | LULU | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $3.99B | $38.45B |
| EPS | -$0.04 | $13.02 |
| PEG Ratio | 2.72 | 1.54 |
| Total Revenue (TTM) | $4.00B | $7.79B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $1.83B | $4.59B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | -$107.34M | $2.28B |
Correlation
The correlation between UAA and LULU is 0.48, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UAA vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a 10.13% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -39.66% return. Over the past 10 years, UAA has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of -12.16%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 21.78% annualized return. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UAA vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UAA vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
Neither UAA nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UAA vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -88.15%, roughly equal to the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UAA vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) has a higher volatility of 30.73% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 11.17%. This indicates that UAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
UAA vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities