UAA vs. LULU

In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a -0.97% return, which is significantly higher than LULU's -2.28% return. Over the past 10 years, UAA has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of -13.81%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 18.96% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UAA Sharpe Ratio is 0.20, which is higher than the LULU Sharpe Ratio of -0.51. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAA and LULU, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Neither UAA nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.

The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -88.15%, roughly equal to the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) have volatilities of 8.89% and 9.03%, respectively, indicating that both stocks experience similar levels of price fluctuations. This suggests that the risk associated with both stocks, as measured by volatility, is nearly the same. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.