UAA vs. LULU
Compare and contrast key facts about Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UAA or LULU.
Correlation
The correlation between UAA and LULU is 0.51, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UAA vs. LULU - Performance Comparison
Key characteristics
UAA:
-0.18
LULU:
-0.42
UAA:
0.15
LULU:
-0.38
UAA:
1.02
LULU:
0.95
UAA:
-0.12
LULU:
-0.36
UAA:
-0.46
LULU:
-0.94
UAA:
24.33%
LULU:
20.55%
UAA:
60.22%
LULU:
43.66%
UAA:
-90.81%
LULU:
-92.24%
UAA:
-88.95%
LULU:
-44.76%
Fundamentals
UAA:
$2.51B
LULU:
$33.47B
UAA:
-$0.29
LULU:
$14.64
UAA:
1.74
LULU:
1.14
UAA:
0.47
LULU:
3.15
UAA:
1.30
LULU:
8.04
UAA:
$3.98B
LULU:
$8.38B
UAA:
$1.92B
LULU:
$5.00B
UAA:
-$14.11M
LULU:
$2.31B
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a -28.26% return, which is significantly lower than LULU's -26.14% return. Over the past 10 years, UAA has underperformed LULU with an annualized return of -17.49%, while LULU has yielded a comparatively higher 15.75% annualized return.
UAA
-28.26%
20.24%
-46.63%
-10.54%
-9.89%
-17.49%
LULU
-26.14%
14.06%
-10.42%
-18.28%
3.49%
15.75%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UAA vs. LULU — Risk-Adjusted Performance Rank
UAA
LULU
UAA vs. LULU - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UAA vs. LULU - Dividend Comparison
Neither UAA nor LULU has paid dividends to shareholders.
Drawdowns
UAA vs. LULU - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -90.81%, roughly equal to the maximum LULU drawdown of -92.24%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and LULU. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UAA vs. LULU - Volatility Comparison
Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) has a higher volatility of 19.39% compared to Lululemon Athletica Inc. (LULU) at 14.27%. This indicates that UAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than LULU based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
UAA vs. LULU - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Lululemon Athletica Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UAA vs. LULU - Profitability Comparison
UAA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 665.16M and revenue of 1.40B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 47.5%.
LULU - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a gross profit of 2.18B and revenue of 3.61B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 60.4%.
UAA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of 13.51M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in an operating margin of 1.0%.
LULU - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported an operating income of 1.04B and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in an operating margin of 28.9%.
UAA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of 1.23M and revenue of 1.40B, resulting in a net margin of 0.1%.
LULU - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on May 2025, Lululemon Athletica Inc. reported a net income of 748.40M and revenue of 3.61B, resulting in a net margin of 20.7%.