UAA vs. VFC
UAA (Under Armour, Inc.) and VFC (V.F. Corporation) are both stocks. Both operate in the Apparel Manufacturing industry within the Consumer Cyclical sector. Over the past 10 years, UAA returned -17.33%/yr vs -9.18%/yr for VFC. A 0.56 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined.
Performance
UAA vs. VFC - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a 9.26% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -7.09% return. Over the past 10 years, UAA has underperformed VFC with an annualized return of -17.33%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively higher -9.18% annualized return.
UAA
- 1D
- -1.99%
- 1M
- -13.67%
- YTD
- 9.26%
- 6M
- 19.08%
- 1Y
- -16.59%
- 3Y*
- -11.52%
- 5Y*
- -24.51%
- 10Y*
- -17.33%
VFC
- 1D
- 0.06%
- 1M
- -12.10%
- YTD
- -7.09%
- 6M
- -4.73%
- 1Y
- 39.82%
- 3Y*
- 0.15%
- 5Y*
- -24.27%
- 10Y*
- -9.18%
UAA vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAA Under Armour, Inc. | 9.26% | -39.98% | -5.80% | -13.48% | -52.05% | 23.41% | -20.51% | 22.24% | 22.45% | -50.33% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | -7.09% | -13.83% | 16.64% | -28.51% | -60.38% | -12.05% | -12.00% | 51.70% | -1.33% | 42.78% |
Correlation
The correlation between UAA and VFC is 0.54, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.54 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.53 |
Correlation (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 0.59 |
Correlation (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.58 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 21, 2005 | 0.56 |
The correlation between UAA and VFC has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.53 to 0.59 - a consistent structural relationship.
Fundamentals
UAA:
-$1.16
VFC:
$0.57
UAA:
0.47
VFC:
0.69
UAA:
$4.97B
VFC:
$9.58B
UAA:
$2.26B
VFC:
$5.16B
UAA:
-$36.44M
VFC:
$961.05M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UAA vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank
UAA
VFC
UAA vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| UAA | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.30 | 0.82 | -1.13 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.08 | 1.40 | -1.48 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 0.99 | 1.17 | -0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | -0.44 | 1.46 | -1.90 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | -0.71 | 3.50 | -4.20 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| UAA | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | -0.30 | 0.82 | -1.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | -0.47 | -0.46 | -0.01 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | -0.33 | -0.21 | -0.13 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.05 | 0.23 | -0.17 |
Drawdowns
UAA vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, roughly equal to the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and VFC.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UAA | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.99% | -88.41% | -3.58% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -43.42% | -25.57% | -17.85% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -62.53% | -63.66% | +1.13% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -84.53% | -86.78% | +2.25% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -90.43% | -88.41% | -2.02% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -89.57% | -79.64% | -9.93% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -45.70% | -21.62% | -24.08% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 26.93% | 10.65% | +16.28% |
Volatility
UAA vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison
Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) has a higher volatility of 23.01% compared to V.F. Corporation (VFC) at 13.38%. This indicates that UAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UAA | VFC | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 23.01% | 13.38% | +9.63% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 43.30% | 31.50% | +11.80% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 54.68% | 48.79% | +5.89% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 52.73% | 53.48% | -0.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 52.12% | 44.89% | +7.23% |
Dividends
UAA vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison
UAA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.15%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 2.15% | 1.99% | 1.68% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% |
Financials
UAA vs. VFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UAA vs. VFC - Profitability Comparison
UAA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 492.04M and revenue of 1.17B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 42.0%.
VFC - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.
UAA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
VFC - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 289.05M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.
UAA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.17B, resulting in a net margin of -3.7%.
VFC - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Jun 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of 300.85M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UAA and VFC have a correlation of 0.54, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
UAA has higher volatility (23.01%) compared to VFC (13.38%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UAA dropped -91.99% vs VFC's -88.41%.
VFC currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (0.82 vs -0.30), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UAA and VFC
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer