UAA vs. VFC

Last updated Apr 2, 2026

Compare and contrast key facts about Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and V.F. Corporation (VFC).

Performance

UAA vs. VFC - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

UAA vs. VFC - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017
UAA Under Armour, Inc.	15.69%	-39.98%	-5.80%	-13.48%	-52.05%	23.41%	-20.51%	22.24%	22.45%	-50.33%
VFC V.F. Corporation	-5.93%	-13.83%	16.64%	-28.51%	-60.38%	-12.05%	-12.00%	51.70%	-1.33%	42.78%

Fundamentals

Market Cap UAA : $2.44B VFC : $6.72B
EPS UAA : -$1.22 VFC : $0.57
PS Ratio UAA : 0.49 VFC : 0.70
PB Ratio UAA : 1.70 VFC : 3.77
Total Revenue (TTM) UAA : $4.98B VFC : $9.58B
Gross Profit (TTM) UAA : $2.32B VFC : $5.16B
EBITDA (TTM) UAA : -$45.77M VFC : $753.14M

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a 15.69% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -5.93% return. Over the past 10 years, UAA has underperformed VFC with an annualized return of -18.10%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively higher -9.48% annualized return.

UAA

• 1D: -2.71%
• 1M: -20.47%
• YTD: 15.69%
• 6M: 14.31%
• 1Y: -9.45%
• 3Y*: -15.38%
• 5Y*: -23.52%
• 10Y*: -18.10%

VFC

• 1D: -0.41%
• 1M: -10.15%
• YTD: -5.93%
• 6M: 11.43%
• 1Y: 7.54%
• 3Y*: -7.00%
• 5Y*: -24.12%
• 10Y*: -9.48%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Return for Risk

UAA vs. VFC — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

UAA

UAA Risk / Return Rank: 34
UAA Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
UAA Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
UAA Omega Ratio Rank: 33
UAA Calmar Ratio Rank: 35
UAA Martin Ratio Rank: 35

VFC

VFC Risk / Return Rank: 46
VFC Sharpe Ratio Rank: 44
VFC Sortino Ratio Rank: 45
VFC Omega Ratio Rank: 47
VFC Calmar Ratio Rank: 48
VFC Martin Ratio Rank: 48

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

UAA vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

	UAA	VFC	Difference
Sharpe ratio Return per unit of total volatility	-0.17	0.11	-0.28
Sortino ratio Return per unit of downside risk	0.17	0.64	-0.47
Omega ratio Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.02	1.10	-0.07
Calmar ratio Return relative to maximum drawdown	-0.18	0.29	-0.47
Martin ratio Return relative to average drawdown	-0.32	0.65	-0.97
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month.

UAA vs. VFC - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current UAA Sharpe Ratio is -0.17, which is lower than the VFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.11. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAA and VFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

Sharpe Ratios by Period

	UAA	VFC	Difference
Sharpe Ratio (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	-0.17	0.11	-0.28
Sharpe Ratio (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period	-0.45	-0.46	0.00
Sharpe Ratio (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period	-0.35	-0.21	-0.14
Sharpe Ratio (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history	0.06	0.23	-0.17

Correlation

The correlation between UAA and VFC is 0.56, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.

Dividends

UAA vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison

UAA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.13%.

	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
UAA Under Armour, Inc.	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%
VFC V.F. Corporation	2.13%	1.99%	1.68%	5.27%	7.28%	2.69%	2.26%	1.91%	2.65%	2.32%	2.87%	2.14%

Drawdowns

UAA vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -91.99%, roughly equal to the maximum VFC drawdown of -88.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and VFC.

Drawdown Indicators

	UAA	VFC	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-91.99%	-88.41%	-3.58%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-43.42%	-40.57%	-2.85%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	-84.53%	-87.51%	+2.98%
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	-91.13%	-88.41%	-2.72%
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-88.95%	-79.39%	-9.56%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-45.35%	-21.39%	-23.96%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	24.95%	17.70%	+7.25%

Volatility

UAA vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) is 11.15%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 12.29%. This indicates that UAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	UAA	VFC	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	11.15%	12.29%	-1.14%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	37.36%	35.73%	+1.63%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	57.41%	67.94%	-10.53%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	52.06%	53.13%	-1.07%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	51.75%	44.57%	+7.18%

Financials

UAA vs. VFC - Profitability Comparison

The chart below illustrates the profitability comparison between Under Armour, Inc. and V.F. Corporation over time, highlighting three key metrics: Gross Profit Margin, Operating Margin, and Net Profit Margin.

UAA - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 589.74M and revenue of 1.33B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 44.4%.

VFC - Gross Margin

Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a gross profit of 1.60B and revenue of 2.88B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 55.6%.

UAA - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -149.78M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in an operating margin of -11.3%.

VFC - Operating Margin

Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, V.F. Corporation reported an operating income of 289.05M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in an operating margin of 10.1%.

UAA - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -430.83M and revenue of 1.33B, resulting in a net margin of -32.5%.

VFC - Net Margin

Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Apr 2026, V.F. Corporation reported a net income of 300.85M and revenue of 2.88B, resulting in a net margin of 10.5%.