UAA vs. VFC

In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a -1.93% return, which is significantly lower than VFC's 21.10% return. Over the past 10 years, UAA has underperformed VFC with an annualized return of -13.13%, while VFC has yielded a comparatively higher -8.24% annualized return.

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

The current UAA Sharpe Ratio is -0.12, which is lower than the VFC Sharpe Ratio of 0.48. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of UAA and VFC, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.

UAA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 1.62%.

The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -88.15%, roughly equal to the maximum VFC drawdown of -86.04%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and VFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.

Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) has a higher volatility of 15.49% compared to V.F. Corporation (VFC) at 10.10%. This indicates that UAA's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.