UAA vs. VFC
Compare and contrast key facts about Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and V.F. Corporation (VFC).
Scroll down to visually compare performance, riskiness, drawdowns, and other indicators and decide which better suits your portfolio: UAA or VFC.
Key characteristics
| UAA | VFC | |
|---|---|---|
| YTD Return | -23.66% | -30.25% |
| 1Y Return | -9.57% | -34.26% |
| 3Y Return (Ann) | -33.89% | -44.62% |
| 5Y Return (Ann) | -22.26% | -28.97% |
| 10Y Return (Ann) | -12.16% | -11.58% |
| Sharpe Ratio | -0.21 | -0.60 |
| Daily Std Dev | 39.68% | 57.13% |
| Max Drawdown | -88.10% | -85.88% |
| Current Drawdown | -87.52% | -84.80% |
Fundamentals
| UAA | VFC | |
|---|---|---|
| Market Cap | $2.89B | $4.83B |
| EPS | $0.89 | -$1.97 |
| PE Ratio | 7.54 | 57.07 |
| PEG Ratio | 1.67 | 0.14 |
| Revenue (TTM) | $5.77B | $10.82B |
| Gross Profit (TTM) | $2.42B | $6.46B |
| EBITDA (TTM) | $415.12M | $1.07B |
Correlation
The correlation between UAA and VFC is 0.57, which is considered to be moderate. This suggests that the two assets have some degree of positive relationship in their price movements. Moderate correlation can be acceptable for portfolio diversification, offering a balance between risk and potential returns.
Performance
UAA vs. VFC - Performance Comparison
In the year-to-date period, UAA achieves a -23.66% return, which is significantly higher than VFC's -30.25% return. Both investments have delivered pretty close results over the past 10 years, with UAA having a -12.16% annualized return and VFC not far ahead at -11.58%. The chart below displays the growth of a $10,000 investment in both assets, with all prices adjusted for splits and dividends.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Risk-Adjusted Performance
UAA vs. VFC - Risk-Adjusted Performance Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) and V.F. Corporation (VFC). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Dividends
UAA vs. VFC - Dividend Comparison
UAA has not paid dividends to shareholders, while VFC's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 5.98%.
| TTM | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | 2014 | 2013 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UAA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
VFC V.F. Corporation | 5.98% | 5.27% | 7.28% | 2.69% | 2.26% | 1.91% | 2.65% | 2.32% | 2.87% | 2.14% | 1.48% | 1.47% |
Drawdowns
UAA vs. VFC - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UAA drawdown since its inception was -88.10%, roughly equal to the maximum VFC drawdown of -85.88%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UAA and VFC. For additional features, visit the drawdowns tool.
Volatility
UAA vs. VFC - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Under Armour, Inc. (UAA) is 5.74%, while V.F. Corporation (VFC) has a volatility of 8.84%. This indicates that UAA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than VFC based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Financials
UAA vs. VFC - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and V.F. Corporation. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities