UA vs. ALGT
UA (Under Armour, Inc.) and ALGT (Allegiant Travel Company) are both stocks. UA operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical), while ALGT operates in Airlines (Industrials). Over the past 10 years, UA returned -15.61%/yr vs -1.13%/yr for ALGT. Their 0.45 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship.
Performance
UA vs. ALGT - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, UA achieves a 38.13% return, which is significantly higher than ALGT's 21.36% return. Over the past 10 years, UA has underperformed ALGT with an annualized return of -15.61%, while ALGT has yielded a comparatively higher -1.13% annualized return.
UA
- 1D
- 2.16%
- 1M
- 2.31%
- 6M
- 9.41%
- YTD
- 38.13%
- 1Y
- 7.11%
- 3Y*
- -2.71%
- 5Y*
- -20.22%
- 10Y*
- -15.61%
- ALL TIME*
- -16.29%
ALGT
- 1D
- 5.51%
- 1M
- -12.80%
- 6M
- 13.64%
- YTD
- 21.36%
- 1Y
- 115.05%
- 3Y*
- -1.98%
- 5Y*
- -10.38%
- 10Y*
- -1.13%
- ALL TIME*
- 8.88%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $44.44M | $47.15M | $57.96M | |
| $15.04M | $16.63M | $19.28M |
UA vs. ALGT - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 38.13% | -35.66% | -10.66% | -6.39% | -50.55% | 21.24% | -22.42% | 18.61% | 21.40% | -47.08% |
ALGT Allegiant Travel Company | 21.36% | -9.40% | 16.03% | 23.44% | -63.65% | -1.16% | 9.32% | 76.98% | -33.95% | -5.16% |
Correlation
The correlation between UA and ALGT is 0.41, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.41 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.40 |
Correlation (5Y) Shows whether the relationship held over a longer period. | 0.47 |
Correlation (10Y) Provides a long-term view across more market conditions. | 0.45 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Apr 7, 2016 | 0.45 |
Fundamentals
UA:
$2.83B
ALGT:
$1.89B
UA:
-$1.16
ALGT:
-$1.89
UA:
0.57
ALGT:
0.71
UA:
2.00
ALGT:
1.72K
UA:
$4.97B
ALGT:
$2.64B
UA:
$2.26B
ALGT:
$815.04M
UA:
-$86.93M
ALGT:
$340.03M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
UA vs. ALGT — Risk / Return Rank
UA
ALGT
UA vs. ALGT - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) and Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| UA | ALGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -1.67 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -2.16 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.30 | -0.22 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.19 | 2.96 | -2.77 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 0.29 | 6.92 | -6.63 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
UA vs. ALGT - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum UA drawdown since its inception was -91.34%, which is greater than ALGT's maximum drawdown of -86.01%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for UA and ALGT.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| UA | ALGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -91.34% | -86.01% | -5.33% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -38.13% | -39.13% | +1.00% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -60.16% | -66.91% | +6.75% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -82.50% | -81.93% | -0.57% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -89.92% | -86.01% | -3.91% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -85.50% | -60.17% | -25.33% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -69.41% | -31.89% | -37.52% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 24.17% | 16.69% | +7.48% |
Volatility
UA vs. ALGT - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Under Armour, Inc. (UA) is 14.15%, while Allegiant Travel Company (ALGT) has a volatility of 16.00%. This indicates that UA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than ALGT based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| UA | ALGT | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 14.15% | 16.00% | -1.85% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 42.94% | 46.68% | -3.74% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 53.86% | 64.31% | -10.45% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 50.58% | 55.28% | -4.70% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 50.47% | 51.66% | -1.19% |
Dividends
UA vs. ALGT - Dividend Comparison
Neither UA nor ALGT has paid dividends to shareholders.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
ALGT Allegiant Travel Company | 0.00% | 0.00% | 1.27% | 1.45% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.37% | 1.61% | 2.79% | 1.81% | 1.44% | 1.64% |
UA Under Armour, Inc. | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Financials
UA vs. ALGT - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Under Armour, Inc. and Allegiant Travel Company. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
UA vs. ALGT - Profitability Comparison
UA - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a gross profit of 465.14M and revenue of 1.15B. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 40.3%.
ALGT - Gross Margin
Gross margin is calculated as gross profit divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a gross profit of 479.13M and revenue of 732.43M. Therefore, the gross margin over that period was 65.4%.
UA - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported an operating income of -33.70M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in an operating margin of -2.9%.
ALGT - Operating Margin
Operating margin is calculated as operating income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported an operating income of 81.10M and revenue of 732.43M, resulting in an operating margin of 11.1%.
UA - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Under Armour, Inc. reported a net income of -43.39M and revenue of 1.15B, resulting in a net margin of -3.8%.
ALGT - Net Margin
Net margin is calculated as net income divided by revenue. For the three months ending on Aug 2026, Allegiant Travel Company reported a net income of 42.48M and revenue of 732.43M, resulting in a net margin of 5.8%.
Frequently Asked Questions
UA and ALGT have a correlation of 0.41, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
ALGT has higher volatility (16.00%) compared to UA (14.15%). In terms of maximum drawdown, UA dropped -91.34% vs ALGT's -86.01%.
ALGT currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (1.80 vs 0.13), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for UA and ALGT
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer