PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U13G.L vs. INXG.L
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

U13G.L vs. INXG.L - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a £10,000 investment in Amundi US Treasury Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Dist (U13G.L) and iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

U13G.L is traded in GBp, while INXG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the INXG.L values have been converted to GBp using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U13G.L achieves a 0.61% return, which is significantly higher than INXG.L's 0.04% return.


U13G.L

1D
0.11%
1M
1.08%
YTD
0.61%
6M
-1.48%
1Y
4.39%
3Y*
1.46%
5Y*
2.90%
10Y*

INXG.L

1D
0.44%
1M
1.08%
YTD
0.04%
6M
-0.73%
1Y
3.31%
3Y*
-0.63%
5Y*
-8.26%
10Y*
-1.18%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U13G.L vs. INXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
U13G.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Dist
0.61%-2.01%5.86%-1.60%7.66%0.59%-0.77%0.61%6.73%-8.67%
INXG.L
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF
0.04%1.10%-8.66%0.16%-34.27%4.08%11.08%6.27%-0.49%2.21%

Correlation

The correlation between U13G.L and INXG.L is -0.12, meaning they tend to move in opposite directions. This is especially valuable for risk management - when one declines, the other has historically tended to hold steady or rise.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

-0.12

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

-0.07

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.02

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 14, 2016

0.09

The correlation between U13G.L and INXG.L shifts across timeframes, from -0.12 (1 year) to 0.09 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U13G.L vs. INXG.L — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U13G.L
U13G.L Risk / Return Rank: 2424
Overall Rank
U13G.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2323
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U13G.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 2222
Sortino Ratio Rank
U13G.L Omega Ratio Rank: 2222
Omega Ratio Rank
U13G.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 2727
Calmar Ratio Rank
U13G.L Martin Ratio Rank: 2424
Martin Ratio Rank

INXG.L
INXG.L Risk / Return Rank: 1414
Overall Rank
INXG.L Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1414
Sharpe Ratio Rank
INXG.L Sortino Ratio Rank: 1313
Sortino Ratio Rank
INXG.L Omega Ratio Rank: 1313
Omega Ratio Rank
INXG.L Calmar Ratio Rank: 1515
Calmar Ratio Rank
INXG.L Martin Ratio Rank: 1414
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U13G.L vs. INXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Dist (U13G.L) and iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


U13G.LINXG.LDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

+0.45

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

+0.63

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.14

1.06

+0.08

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.27

0.50

+0.77

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

3.07

1.08

+1.99

U13G.L vs. INXG.L - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U13G.L Sharpe Ratio is 0.78, which is higher than the INXG.L Sharpe Ratio of 0.33. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U13G.L and INXG.L, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


U13G.LINXG.LDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.78

0.33

+0.45

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

-0.41

+0.81

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.07

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.21

-0.71

+0.91

Drawdowns

U13G.L vs. INXG.L - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U13G.L drawdown since its inception was -18.93%, smaller than the maximum INXG.L drawdown of -99.05%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U13G.L and INXG.L.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U13G.LINXG.LDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-18.93%

-99.05%

+80.12%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-4.58%

-6.62%

+2.04%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-8.93%

-15.04%

+6.11%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-16.31%

-50.87%

+34.56%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-50.87%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-7.67%

-98.31%

+90.64%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-9.14%

-97.27%

+88.13%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.60%

3.06%

+0.54%

Volatility

U13G.L vs. INXG.L - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Amundi US Treasury Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Dist (U13G.L) is 1.49%, while iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a volatility of 3.49%. This indicates that U13G.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U13G.LINXG.LDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

1.49%

3.49%

-2.00%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

4.98%

7.26%

-2.28%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

7.43%

9.89%

-2.46%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

9.11%

20.07%

-10.96%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

9.89%

17.47%

-7.58%

U13G.L vs. INXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison

U13G.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than INXG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.


Dividends

U13G.L vs. INXG.L - Dividend Comparison

U13G.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 3.04%, less than INXG.L's 7.56% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
INXG.L
iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF
7.56%7.23%5.77%0.43%0.00%0.00%0.61%1.36%1.95%1.28%0.65%1.94%
U13G.L
Amundi US Treasury Bond 1-3Y UCITS ETF Dist
3.04%3.06%2.39%1.79%1.46%1.19%1.69%2.19%1.96%1.81%0.73%0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions


U13G.L and INXG.L have a correlation of -0.12, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

On fees, U13G.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

U13G.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for INXG.L.

U13G.L tracks Bloomberg US 1-3 Year Treasury Bond Index, while INXG.L tracks Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for U13G.L and 0.10% for INXG.L.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U13G.L and INXG.L

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer