U10C.L vs. INXG.L
U10C.L (Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc) and INXG.L (iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF) are both Government Bonds funds - U10C.L tracks the Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index while INXG.L tracks the Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, U10C.L returned -0.64%/yr vs 1.93%/yr for INXG.L. A 0.60 correlation means they provide meaningful diversification when combined. U10C.L charges 0.06%/yr vs 0.10%/yr for INXG.L.
Performance
U10C.L vs. INXG.L - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Different Trading Currencies
U10C.L is traded in USD, while INXG.L is traded in GBP. To make them comparable, the INXG.L values have been converted to USD using the latest available exchange rates.
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, U10C.L achieves a -1.06% return, which is significantly lower than INXG.L's -0.20% return.
U10C.L
- 1D
- 0.35%
- 1M
- 0.63%
- YTD
- -1.06%
- 6M
- -0.98%
- 1Y
- 4.22%
- 3Y*
- -0.64%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
INXG.L
- 1D
- 0.49%
- 1M
- 0.22%
- YTD
- -0.20%
- 6M
- 0.00%
- 1Y
- 2.32%
- 3Y*
- 1.93%
- 5Y*
- -9.23%
- 10Y*
- -1.89%
U10C.L vs. INXG.L - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
U10C.L Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc | -1.06% | 5.51% | -5.71% | 2.61% | -28.28% | -1.82% |
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF | -0.20% | 8.73% | -10.18% | 5.45% | -41.30% | -2.65% |
Correlation
The correlation between U10C.L and INXG.L is 0.60, which is moderate. They share some common price drivers but move independently often enough to provide real diversification benefit when combined.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.60 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.65 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 17, 2021 | 0.60 |
The correlation between U10C.L and INXG.L has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.60 to 0.65 - a consistent structural relationship.
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
U10C.L vs. INXG.L — Risk / Return Rank
U10C.L
INXG.L
U10C.L vs. INXG.L - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) and iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| U10C.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | +0.31 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | +0.42 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.08 | 1.04 | +0.05 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 0.60 | 0.30 | +0.30 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 1.59 | 0.62 | +0.97 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| U10C.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.48 | 0.17 | +0.31 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.41 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | — | -0.10 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | -0.50 | 0.05 | -0.55 |
Drawdowns
U10C.L vs. INXG.L - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum U10C.L drawdown since its inception was -40.18%, smaller than the maximum INXG.L drawdown of -60.41%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U10C.L and INXG.L.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| U10C.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -40.18% | -60.41% | +20.23% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -6.99% | -7.74% | +0.75% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -17.05% | -18.39% | +1.34% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -60.41% | — |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | — | -60.41% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -30.22% | -42.61% | +12.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -27.31% | -14.98% | -12.33% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 2.65% | 3.72% | -1.07% |
Volatility
U10C.L vs. INXG.L - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc (U10C.L) is 3.14%, while iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF (INXG.L) has a volatility of 4.74%. This indicates that U10C.L experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than INXG.L based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| U10C.L | INXG.L | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 3.14% | 4.74% | -1.60% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 6.07% | 9.63% | -3.56% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 8.82% | 13.32% | -4.50% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 22.76% | -8.78% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 13.98% | 19.73% | -5.75% |
U10C.L vs. INXG.L - Expense Ratio Comparison
U10C.L has a 0.06% expense ratio, which is lower than INXG.L's 0.10% expense ratio. Despite the difference, both funds are considered low-cost compared to the broader market, where average expense ratios usually range from 0.3% to 0.9%.
Dividends
U10C.L vs. INXG.L - Dividend Comparison
U10C.L has not paid dividends to shareholders, while INXG.L's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 7.56%.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
INXG.L iShares £ Index-Linked Gilts UCITS ETF | 7.56% | 7.23% | 5.77% | 0.43% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.61% | 1.36% | 1.95% | 1.28% | 0.65% | 1.94% |
U10C.L Amundi US Treasury Bond 10+Y UCITS ETF Acc | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% |
Frequently Asked Questions
U10C.L and INXG.L have a correlation of 0.60, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
On fees, U10C.L is cheaper at 0.06% per year. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
U10C.L is cheaper with a 0.06% expense ratio, compared with 0.10% for INXG.L.
U10C.L tracks Bloomberg US Long Treasury Index, while INXG.L tracks Bloomberg UK Government Inflation-Linked Bond Index. They also come from different issuers: Amundi and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.06% for U10C.L and 0.10% for INXG.L.
Find the right allocation for U10C.L and INXG.L
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer