PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
U-U.TO vs. UNH
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends
Financials

Performance

U-U.TO vs. UNH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a CA$10,000 investment in Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Different Trading Currencies

U-U.TO is traded in CAD, while UNH is traded in USD. To make them comparable, the UNH values have been converted to CAD using the latest available exchange rates.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, U-U.TO achieves a -5.18% return, which is significantly lower than UNH's 27.38% return.


U-U.TO

1D
-0.86%
1M
-6.71%
YTD
-5.18%
6M
2.95%
1Y
8.26%
3Y*
11.36%
5Y*
10Y*

UNH

1D
1.02%
1M
3.99%
YTD
27.38%
6M
22.28%
1Y
34.98%
3Y*
-2.63%
5Y*
5.29%
10Y*
14.30%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

U-U.TO vs. UNH - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024202320222021
U-U.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
-5.18%12.78%-18.83%82.05%6.27%19.41%
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
27.38%-36.19%5.85%-1.60%13.71%22.77%

Correlation

The correlation between U-U.TO and UNH is 0.06, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.06

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.01

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jul 26, 2021

0.11

The correlation between U-U.TO and UNH shifts across timeframes, from 0.01 (3 years) to 0.11 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.

Fundamentals

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

U-U.TO vs. UNH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

U-U.TO
U-U.TO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
U-U.TO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5151
Sharpe Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Sortino Ratio Rank: 4646
Sortino Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Omega Ratio Rank: 4545
Omega Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5252
Calmar Ratio Rank
U-U.TO Martin Ratio Rank: 5151
Martin Ratio Rank

UNH
UNH Risk / Return Rank: 6666
Overall Rank
UNH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 6969
Sharpe Ratio Rank
UNH Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
UNH Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
UNH Calmar Ratio Rank: 6565
Calmar Ratio Rank
UNH Martin Ratio Rank: 6565
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

U-U.TO vs. UNH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.


U-U.TOUNHDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-0.64

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-0.77

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.07

1.20

-0.13

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

0.36

1.19

-0.83

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

0.69

2.58

-1.88

U-U.TO vs. UNH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current U-U.TO Sharpe Ratio is 0.24, which is lower than the UNH Sharpe Ratio of 0.88. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of U-U.TO and UNH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Drawdowns

U-U.TO vs. UNH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum U-U.TO drawdown since its inception was -48.74%, smaller than the maximum UNH drawdown of -72.58%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for U-U.TO and UNH.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


U-U.TOUNHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-48.74%

-72.58%

+23.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-23.11%

-29.47%

+6.36%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-48.74%

-61.53%

+12.79%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-61.53%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-61.53%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-26.31%

-31.89%

+5.58%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-21.88%

-17.96%

-3.92%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

11.91%

13.63%

-1.72%

Volatility

U-U.TO vs. UNH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund (U-U.TO) is 6.22%, while UnitedHealth Group Incorporated (UNH) has a volatility of 7.90%. This indicates that U-U.TO experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than UNH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


U-U.TOUNHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.22%

7.90%

-1.68%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

25.63%

30.84%

-5.21%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

35.26%

39.99%

-4.73%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

41.87%

32.57%

+9.30%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

41.87%

30.92%

+10.95%

Dividends

U-U.TO vs. UNH - Dividend Comparison

U-U.TO has not paid dividends to shareholders, while UNH's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 2.16%.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
U-U.TO
Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund
0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%0.00%
UNH
UnitedHealth Group Incorporated
2.16%2.64%1.62%1.38%1.21%1.12%1.38%1.41%1.38%1.30%1.48%1.59%

Financials

U-U.TO vs. UNH - Financials Comparison

This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Sprott Physical Uranium Trust Fund and UnitedHealth Group Incorporated. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.


Quarterly
Annual

Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities


70.00B80.00B90.00B100.00B110.00BJulyOctober2022AprilJulyOctober2023AprilJulyOctober2024AprilJulyOctober2025AprilJulyOctober2026
111.72B
(U-U.TO) Total Revenue
(UNH) Total Revenue
Please note, different currencies. U-U.TO values in CAD, UNH values in USD

Frequently Asked Questions


U-U.TO and UNH have a correlation of 0.06, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for U-U.TO and UNH

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer