TYRA vs. FIGS
TYRA (Tyra Biosciences, Inc.) and FIGS (FIGS, Inc.) are both stocks. TYRA operates in Biotechnology (Healthcare), while FIGS operates in Apparel Manufacturing (Consumer Cyclical). Over the past 3 years, TYRA returned 25.41%/yr vs 10.46%/yr for FIGS. At a 0.24 correlation, their price movements are largely independent.
Performance
TYRA vs. FIGS - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYRA achieves a 9.01% return, which is significantly higher than FIGS's 0.62% return.
TYRA
- 1D
- -5.69%
- 1M
- -15.80%
- YTD
- 9.01%
- 6M
- 37.00%
- 1Y
- 198.54%
- 3Y*
- 25.41%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
FIGS
- 1D
- -2.64%
- 1M
- -25.78%
- YTD
- 0.62%
- 6M
- 7.32%
- 1Y
- 162.76%
- 3Y*
- 10.46%
- 5Y*
- -18.49%
- 10Y*
- —
TYRA vs. FIGS - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYRA Tyra Biosciences, Inc. | 9.01% | 89.14% | 0.36% | 82.24% | -45.98% | -45.88% |
FIGS FIGS, Inc. | 0.62% | 83.52% | -10.94% | 3.27% | -75.58% | -32.22% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYRA and FIGS is 0.08, meaning there is essentially no relationship between their price movements. Each responds to its own set of market drivers, making them strong candidates for combining in a diversified portfolio.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.08 |
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period | 0.20 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Sep 16, 2021 | 0.24 |
The correlation between TYRA and FIGS shifts across timeframes, from 0.08 (1 year) to 0.24 (all time), reflecting how their relationship changes across market environments.
Fundamentals
TYRA:
$1.77B
FIGS:
$2.24B
TYRA:
-$2.18
FIGS:
$0.22
TYRA:
4.57
FIGS:
5.20
TYRA:
$0.00
FIGS:
$666.10M
TYRA:
-$132.00K
FIGS:
$443.68M
TYRA:
-$129.69M
FIGS:
$56.86M
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYRA vs. FIGS — Risk / Return Rank
TYRA
FIGS
TYRA vs. FIGS - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tyra Biosciences, Inc. (TYRA) and FIGS, Inc. (FIGS). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TYRA | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 3.27 | 2.60 | +0.67 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 3.90 | 3.06 | +0.83 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.44 | 1.44 | +0.01 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 7.59 | 4.90 | +2.69 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 30.54 | 15.08 | +15.46 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading charts...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TYRA | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 3.27 | 2.60 | +0.67 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | — | -0.26 | — |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.03 | -0.25 | +0.28 |
Drawdowns
TYRA vs. FIGS - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYRA drawdown since its inception was -83.22%, smaller than the maximum FIGS drawdown of -92.77%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYRA and FIGS.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYRA | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -83.22% | -92.77% | +9.55% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -27.64% | -33.24% | +5.60% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -75.32% | -58.15% | -17.17% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | — | -92.77% | — |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -27.64% | -77.19% | +49.55% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -51.08% | -75.93% | +24.85% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 6.87% | 10.79% | -3.92% |
Volatility
TYRA vs. FIGS - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tyra Biosciences, Inc. (TYRA) is 16.23%, while FIGS, Inc. (FIGS) has a volatility of 32.88%. This indicates that TYRA experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than FIGS based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYRA | FIGS | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 16.23% | 32.88% | -16.65% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 39.03% | 51.95% | -12.92% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 61.67% | 62.97% | -1.30% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 81.88% | 70.13% | +11.75% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 81.88% | 70.39% | +11.49% |
Dividends
TYRA vs. FIGS - Dividend Comparison
Neither TYRA nor FIGS has paid dividends to shareholders.
Financials
TYRA vs. FIGS - Financials Comparison
This section allows you to compare key financial metrics between Tyra Biosciences, Inc. and FIGS, Inc.. You can select fields from income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow statements to easily visualize and compare the financial health of both companies.
Total Revenue: Total amount of money received from sales and other business activities
Frequently Asked Questions
TYRA and FIGS have a correlation of 0.08, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
FIGS has higher volatility (32.88%) compared to TYRA (16.23%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYRA dropped -83.22% vs FIGS's -92.77%.
TYRA currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.27 vs 2.60), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TYRA and FIGS
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer