TYLG vs. HYGW
TYLG (Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF) and HYGW (iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF) are both Derivative Income funds - TYLG tracks the Cboe S&P Technology Select Sector Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross while HYGW tracks the Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TYLG returned 21.84%/yr vs 5.49%/yr for HYGW. Their 0.47 correlation means their historical movements had little consistent relationship. TYLG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.69%/yr for HYGW.
Performance
TYLG vs. HYGW - Performance Comparison
Loading charts...
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYLG achieves a 17.59% return, which is significantly higher than HYGW's 2.68% return.
TYLG
- 1D
- 1.38%
- 1M
- -0.29%
- 6M
- 16.32%
- YTD
- 17.59%
- 1Y
- 32.47%
- 3Y*
- 21.84%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 25.33%
HYGW
- 1D
- 0.31%
- 1M
- 0.35%
- 6M
- 2.13%
- YTD
- 2.68%
- 1Y
- 6.23%
- 3Y*
- 5.49%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
- ALL TIME*
- 5.75%
Liquidity Comparison
| Position | Avg. Volume Value (2W) | Avg. Volume Value (1M) | Avg. Volume Value (3M) |
|---|---|---|---|
| $507.28K | $613.90K | $793.25K | |
| $118.02K | $128.07K | $139.81K |
TYLG vs. HYGW - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 17.59% | 16.84% | 20.57% | 41.56% | -1.78% |
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 2.68% | 6.19% | 6.99% | 7.31% | 0.41% |
Correlation
The correlation between TYLG and HYGW is 0.49, which is low. Their historical price movements had little consistent relationship.
| Correlation | |
|---|---|
Correlation (1Y) Focuses on recent behavior, but can change the most. | 0.49 |
Correlation (3Y) Balances recent behavior with more history. | 0.44 |
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022 | 0.47 |
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
Return for Risk
TYLG vs. HYGW — Risk / Return Rank
TYLG
HYGW
TYLG vs. HYGW - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.
| TYLG | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | -0.43 | ||
| Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | -0.81 | ||
| Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.29 | 1.44 | -0.14 |
| Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 3.02 | 3.44 | -0.42 |
| Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 9.99 | 15.37 | -5.38 |
Loading charts...
Drawdowns
TYLG vs. HYGW - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYLG drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, which is greater than HYGW's maximum drawdown of -5.49%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLG and HYGW.
Loading charts...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYLG | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -5.49% | -18.52% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -10.78% | -1.82% | -8.96% |
Max Drawdown (3Y)Largest decline over 3 years | -24.01% | -3.42% | -20.59% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -5.60% | 0.00% | -5.60% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.82% | -0.59% | -2.23% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.26% | 0.41% | +2.85% |
Volatility
TYLG vs. HYGW - Volatility Comparison
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) has a higher volatility of 8.08% compared to iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF (HYGW) at 0.86%. This indicates that TYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than HYGW based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading charts...
Volatility by Period
| TYLG | HYGW | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 8.08% | 0.86% | +7.22% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 16.64% | 2.34% | +14.30% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 19.20% | 2.94% | +16.26% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 4.62% | +15.11% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.73% | 4.62% | +15.11% |
TYLG vs. HYGW - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than HYGW's 0.69% expense ratio.
Dividends
TYLG vs. HYGW - Dividend Comparison
TYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.78%, less than HYGW's 10.67% yield.
| Position | TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
HYGW iShares High Yield Corporate Bond Buywrite Strategy ETF | 10.67% | 12.53% | 12.30% | 15.98% | 8.71% |
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 8.78% | 7.66% | 7.24% | 11.89% | 0.51% |
Frequently Asked Questions
TYLG and HYGW have a correlation of 0.49, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.
TYLG has higher volatility (8.08%) compared to HYGW (0.86%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYLG dropped -24.01% vs HYGW's -5.49%.
On 3-year performance, TYLG leads with 21.84% vs 5.49% for HYGW. On fees, TYLG is cheaper at 0.60% per year. On volatility, HYGW has been the lower-risk option at 0.86%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.
Over the 3-year period, TYLG has performed better with a 21.84% return vs 5.49%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.
TYLG is cheaper with a 0.60% expense ratio, compared with 0.69% for HYGW.
HYGW has the higher dividend yield at 10.67%, compared with 8.78% for TYLG.
TYLG tracks Cboe S&P Technology Select Sector Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while HYGW tracks Cboe HYG BuyWrite Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and iShares. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TYLG and 0.69% for HYGW.
HYGW currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.13 vs 1.70), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.
Find the right allocation for TYLG and HYGW
Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.
Open Portfolio Optimizer