PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYLG vs. QRMI
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TYLG vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TYLG vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)2025202420232022
TYLG
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
-3.97%16.84%20.57%41.56%-3.64%
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
-3.23%3.76%14.72%11.73%-2.90%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYLG achieves a -3.97% return, which is significantly lower than QRMI's -3.23% return.


TYLG

1D
3.85%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-3.97%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
23.43%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
10Y*

QRMI

1D
0.82%
1M
-3.01%
YTD
-3.23%
6M
0.78%
1Y
1.99%
3Y*
6.13%
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TYLG vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison

Both TYLG and QRMI have an expense ratio of 0.60%.


Return for Risk

TYLG vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYLG
TYLG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

QRMI
QRMI Risk / Return Rank: 1919
Overall Rank
QRMI Sharpe Ratio Rank: 2020
Sharpe Ratio Rank
QRMI Sortino Ratio Rank: 1717
Sortino Ratio Rank
QRMI Omega Ratio Rank: 1818
Omega Ratio Rank
QRMI Calmar Ratio Rank: 2121
Calmar Ratio Rank
QRMI Martin Ratio Rank: 2121
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYLG vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TYLGQRMIDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

0.26

+0.75

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

0.41

+1.17

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

1.06

+0.18

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

0.41

+1.25

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.53

1.19

+6.34

TYLG vs. QRMI - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the QRMI Sharpe Ratio of 0.26. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYLG and QRMI, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TYLGQRMIDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

0.26

+0.75

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

0.07

+0.97

Correlation

The correlation between TYLG and QRMI is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.


Dividends

TYLG vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison

TYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, less than QRMI's 12.76% yield.


TTM20252024202320222021
TYLG
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
9.13%7.66%7.24%11.89%0.51%0.00%
QRMI
Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF
12.76%12.28%11.80%12.44%10.65%3.36%

Drawdowns

TYLG vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYLG drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, which is greater than QRMI's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLG and QRMI.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TYLGQRMIDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.01%

-20.95%

-3.06%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.26%

-5.04%

-9.22%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.63%

-4.26%

-2.37%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-8.25%

+5.41%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

1.72%

+1.41%

Volatility

TYLG vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison

Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 2.90%. This indicates that TYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TYLGQRMIDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

2.90%

+4.06%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

4.87%

+8.04%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.43%

7.74%

+15.69%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

8.46%

+10.88%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.34%

8.46%

+10.88%