TYLG vs. QRMI
Compare and contrast key facts about Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI).
TYLG and QRMI are both exchange-traded funds (ETFs), meaning they are traded on stock exchanges and can be bought and sold throughout the day. TYLG is a passively managed fund by Global X that tracks the performance of the Cboe S&P Technology Select Sector Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross. It was launched on Nov 21, 2022. QRMI is an actively managed fund by Global X. It was launched on Aug 25, 2021.
Performance
TYLG vs. QRMI - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TYLG vs. QRMI - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | -3.97% | 16.84% | 20.57% | 41.56% | -3.64% |
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | -3.23% | 3.76% | 14.72% | 11.73% | -2.90% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYLG achieves a -3.97% return, which is significantly lower than QRMI's -3.23% return.
TYLG
- 1D
- 3.85%
- 1M
- -1.91%
- YTD
- -3.97%
- 6M
- -0.07%
- 1Y
- 23.43%
- 3Y*
- 17.71%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
QRMI
- 1D
- 0.82%
- 1M
- -3.01%
- YTD
- -3.23%
- 6M
- 0.78%
- 1Y
- 1.99%
- 3Y*
- 6.13%
- 5Y*
- —
- 10Y*
- —
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TYLG vs. QRMI - Expense Ratio Comparison
Both TYLG and QRMI have an expense ratio of 0.60%.
Return for Risk
TYLG vs. QRMI — Risk / Return Rank
TYLG
QRMI
TYLG vs. QRMI - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TYLG | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 1.00 | 0.26 | +0.75 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.58 | 0.41 | +1.17 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.24 | 1.06 | +0.18 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.66 | 0.41 | +1.25 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 7.53 | 1.19 | +6.34 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TYLG | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 1.00 | 0.26 | +0.75 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 1.05 | 0.07 | +0.97 |
Correlation
The correlation between TYLG and QRMI is 0.73, which is considered to be high. That indicates a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Having highly-correlated positions in a portfolio may signal a lack of diversification, potentially leading to increased risk during market downturns.
Dividends
TYLG vs. QRMI - Dividend Comparison
TYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, less than QRMI's 12.76% yield.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF | 9.13% | 7.66% | 7.24% | 11.89% | 0.51% | 0.00% |
QRMI Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF | 12.76% | 12.28% | 11.80% | 12.44% | 10.65% | 3.36% |
Drawdowns
TYLG vs. QRMI - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYLG drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, which is greater than QRMI's maximum drawdown of -20.95%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLG and QRMI.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYLG | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -24.01% | -20.95% | -3.06% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -14.26% | -5.04% | -9.22% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -6.63% | -4.26% | -2.37% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -2.84% | -8.25% | +5.41% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 3.13% | 1.72% | +1.41% |
Volatility
TYLG vs. QRMI - Volatility Comparison
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) has a higher volatility of 6.96% compared to Global X NASDAQ 100 Risk Managed Income ETF (QRMI) at 2.90%. This indicates that TYLG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than QRMI based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TYLG | QRMI | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 6.96% | 2.90% | +4.06% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 12.91% | 4.87% | +8.04% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.43% | 7.74% | +15.69% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 8.46% | +10.88% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 19.34% | 8.46% | +10.88% |