TYLG vs. SMH

Last updated Jun 24, 2026

TYLG (Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF) and SMH (VanEck Semiconductor ETF) are both exchange-traded funds - TYLG is a Derivative Income fund tracking the Cboe S&P Technology Select Sector Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SMH is a Semiconductors fund tracking the MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. Both are passively managed. Over the past 3 years, TYLG returned 23.38%/yr vs 62.28%/yr for SMH. Their correlation of 0.89 suggests significant overlap in exposure. TYLG charges 0.60%/yr vs 0.35%/yr for SMH.

Performance

TYLG vs. SMH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYLG achieves a 19.63% return, which is significantly lower than SMH's 72.73% return.

TYLG

• 1D: -3.05%
• 1M: 2.03%
• YTD: 19.63%
• 6M: 18.92%
• 1Y: 39.76%
• 3Y*: 23.38%
• 5Y*: —
• 10Y*: —

SMH

• 1D: -7.01%
• 1M: 7.93%
• YTD: 72.73%
• 6M: 71.29%
• 1Y: 138.23%
• 3Y*: 62.28%
• 5Y*: 38.18%
• 10Y*: 37.85%

*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYLG vs. SMH - Yearly Performance Comparison

	2026 (YTD)	2025	2024	2023	2022
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF	19.63%	16.84%	20.57%	41.56%	-1.78%
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	72.73%	49.17%	39.10%	73.38%	-4.84%

Correlation

The correlation between TYLG and SMH is 0.86, indicating a strong positive relationship between their price movements. Combining them offers limited diversification - they tend to fall together during downturns.

	Correlation
Correlation (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	0.86
Correlation (3Y) Calculated over the trailing 3-year period	0.88
Correlation (All Time) Calculated using the full available price history since Nov 22, 2022	0.89

The correlation between TYLG and SMH has been stable across timeframes, ranging from 0.86 to 0.89 - a consistent structural relationship.

TYLG vs. SMH - Sectors Allocation Comparison

Sectors	TYLG	SMH
Financial Services	54.2%	-
Technology	47.6%	100.0%
Energy	0.1%	-
Industrials	0.0%	-
Basic Materials	-	-
Communication Services	-	-
Consumer Cyclical	-	-
Consumer Defensive	-	-
Healthcare	-	-
Real Estate	-	-
Utilities	-	-

Return for Risk

TYLG vs. SMH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYLG

TYLG Risk / Return Rank: 78
TYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 79
TYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 71
TYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 75
TYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 81
TYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 81

SMH

SMH Risk / Return Rank: 94
SMH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 96
SMH Sortino Ratio Rank: 91
SMH Omega Ratio Rank: 92
SMH Calmar Ratio Rank: 97
SMH Martin Ratio Rank: 96

The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYLG vs. SMH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.

Values are calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. Risk-adjusted metrics are more stable over longer periods — use the period switch above to explore them.

	TYLG	SMH	Difference
Sharpe ratio: Return per unit of total volatility	2.34	3.99	-1.65
Sortino ratio: Return per unit of downside risk	2.98	4.05	-1.07
Omega ratio: Gain probability vs. loss probability	1.41	1.58	-0.17
Calmar ratio: Return relative to maximum drawdown	3.96	9.31	-5.35
Martin ratio: Return relative to average drawdown	14.95	33.88	-18.93

TYLG vs. SMH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYLG Sharpe Ratio is 2.34, which is lower than the SMH Sharpe Ratio of 3.99. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYLG and SMH, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.

Drawdowns

TYLG vs. SMH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYLG drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, smaller than the maximum SMH drawdown of -84.96%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLG and SMH.

Drawdown Indicators

	TYLG	SMH	Difference
Max Drawdown Largest peak-to-trough decline	-24.01%	-84.96%	+60.95%
Max Drawdown (1Y) Largest decline over 1 year	-10.09%	-14.93%	+4.84%
Max Drawdown (3Y) Largest decline over 3 years	-24.01%	-35.74%	+11.73%
Max Drawdown (5Y) Largest decline over 5 years	—	-45.30%	—
Max Drawdown (10Y) Largest decline over 10 years	—	-45.30%	—
Current Drawdown Current decline from peak	-3.96%	-7.01%	+3.05%
Average Drawdown Average peak-to-trough decline	-2.74%	-41.01%	+38.27%
Ulcer Index Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks	2.67%	4.10%	-1.43%

Volatility

TYLG vs. SMH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is 8.24%, while VanEck Semiconductor ETF (SMH) has a volatility of 19.08%. This indicates that TYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than SMH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.

Volatility by Period

	TYLG	SMH	Difference
Volatility (1M) Calculated over the trailing 1-month period	8.24%	19.08%	-10.84%
Volatility (6M) Calculated over the trailing 6-month period	14.54%	29.18%	-14.64%
Volatility (1Y) Calculated over the trailing 1-year period	17.11%	34.87%	-17.76%
Volatility (5Y) Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized	19.44%	35.83%	-16.39%
Volatility (10Y) Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized	19.44%	32.97%	-13.53%

TYLG vs. SMH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is higher than SMH's 0.35% expense ratio.

Dividends

TYLG vs. SMH - Dividend Comparison

TYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 8.11%, more than SMH's 0.18% yield.

Position	TTM	2025	2024	2023	2022	2021	2020	2019	2018	2017	2016	2015
SMH VanEck Semiconductor ETF	0.18%	0.31%	0.44%	0.60%	1.18%	0.51%	0.69%	1.50%	1.88%	1.43%	0.80%	2.14%
TYLG Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF	8.11%	7.66%	7.24%	11.89%	0.51%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%	0.00%

Frequently Asked Questions

Can I hold both TYLG and SMH in my portfolio?

TYLG and SMH have a correlation of 0.86, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

Which is riskier, TYLG or SMH?

SMH has higher volatility (19.08%) compared to TYLG (8.24%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYLG dropped -24.01% vs SMH's -84.96%.

Which ETF is better, TYLG or SMH?

On 3-year performance, SMH leads with 62.28% vs 23.38% for TYLG. On fees, SMH is cheaper at 0.35% per year. On volatility, TYLG has been the lower-risk option at 8.24%. The better choice depends on whether you care most about return, fees, risk, or income.

Which ETF has performed better, TYLG or SMH?

Over the 3-year period, SMH has performed better with a 62.28% return vs 23.38%. Past performance does not guarantee future results, so compare this with risk, fees, and fund exposure.

Which ETF is cheaper, TYLG or SMH?

SMH is cheaper with a 0.35% expense ratio, compared with 0.60% for TYLG.

Which ETF pays a higher dividend yield, TYLG or SMH?

TYLG has the higher dividend yield at 8.11%, compared with 0.18% for SMH.

What is the main difference between TYLG and SMH?

TYLG is categorized as Derivative Income, while SMH is Semiconductors. TYLG tracks Cboe S&P Technology Select Sector Half BuyWrite Index - Benchmark TR Gross, while SMH tracks MVIS US Listed Semiconductor 25 Index. They also come from different issuers: Global X and VanEck. Their fees differ too: 0.60% for TYLG and 0.35% for SMH.

Which has better risk-adjusted returns?

SMH currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (3.99 vs 2.34), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.