PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYLG vs. CRSH
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TYLG vs. CRSH - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TYLG vs. CRSH - Yearly Performance Comparison


Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYLG achieves a -3.97% return, which is significantly lower than CRSH's 20.49% return.


TYLG

1D
3.85%
1M
-1.91%
YTD
-3.97%
6M
-0.07%
1Y
23.43%
3Y*
17.71%
5Y*
10Y*

CRSH

1D
-3.11%
1M
7.70%
YTD
20.49%
6M
22.66%
1Y
-25.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TYLG vs. CRSH - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYLG has a 0.60% expense ratio, which is lower than CRSH's 0.99% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TYLG vs. CRSH — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYLG
TYLG Risk / Return Rank: 6565
Overall Rank
TYLG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5757
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYLG Sortino Ratio Rank: 6262
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYLG Omega Ratio Rank: 6767
Omega Ratio Rank
TYLG Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYLG Martin Ratio Rank: 7373
Martin Ratio Rank

CRSH
CRSH Risk / Return Rank: 44
Overall Rank
CRSH Sharpe Ratio Rank: 33
Sharpe Ratio Rank
CRSH Sortino Ratio Rank: 33
Sortino Ratio Rank
CRSH Omega Ratio Rank: 33
Omega Ratio Rank
CRSH Calmar Ratio Rank: 44
Calmar Ratio Rank
CRSH Martin Ratio Rank: 77
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYLG vs. CRSH - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) and YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TYLGCRSHDifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

1.00

-0.60

+1.60

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

1.58

-0.63

+2.21

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

1.24

0.92

+0.32

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

1.66

-0.50

+2.15

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

7.53

-0.68

+8.21

TYLG vs. CRSH - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYLG Sharpe Ratio is 1.00, which is higher than the CRSH Sharpe Ratio of -0.60. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYLG and CRSH, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TYLGCRSHDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.00

-0.60

+1.60

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

1.05

-0.63

+1.68

Correlation

The correlation between TYLG and CRSH is -0.49. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

TYLG vs. CRSH - Dividend Comparison

TYLG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 9.13%, less than CRSH's 98.84% yield.


TTM2025202420232022
TYLG
Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF
9.13%7.66%7.24%11.89%0.51%
CRSH
YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF
98.84%138.78%94.25%0.00%0.00%

Drawdowns

TYLG vs. CRSH - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYLG drawdown since its inception was -24.01%, smaller than the maximum CRSH drawdown of -63.68%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLG and CRSH.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TYLGCRSHDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-24.01%

-63.68%

+39.67%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-14.26%

-48.16%

+33.90%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-6.63%

-52.59%

+45.96%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-2.84%

-41.89%

+39.05%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.13%

35.17%

-32.04%

Volatility

TYLG vs. CRSH - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Global X Information Technology Covered Call & Growth ETF (TYLG) is 6.96%, while YieldMax Short TSLA Option Income Strategy ETF (CRSH) has a volatility of 8.04%. This indicates that TYLG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CRSH based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TYLGCRSHDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

6.96%

8.04%

-1.08%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

12.91%

23.39%

-10.48%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

23.43%

42.40%

-18.97%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

19.34%

48.40%

-29.06%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

19.34%

48.40%

-29.06%