PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYLD vs. XOMO
Performance
Return for Risk
Dividends
Drawdowns
Volatility

Performance

TYLD vs. XOMO - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading graphics...

TYLD vs. XOMO - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)20252024
TYLD
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
0.84%4.05%5.15%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
23.45%6.90%4.04%

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYLD achieves a 0.84% return, which is significantly lower than XOMO's 23.45% return.


TYLD

1D
0.04%
1M
0.32%
YTD
0.84%
6M
1.95%
1Y
4.18%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*

XOMO

1D
-4.29%
1M
2.32%
YTD
23.45%
6M
31.32%
1Y
22.43%
3Y*
5Y*
10Y*
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


TYLD vs. XOMO - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYLD has a 0.59% expense ratio, which is lower than XOMO's 1.01% expense ratio.


Return for Risk

TYLD vs. XOMO — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYLD
TYLD Risk / Return Rank: 9898
Overall Rank
TYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 9797
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 9898
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9999
Omega Ratio Rank
TYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 9898
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 9898
Martin Ratio Rank

XOMO
XOMO Risk / Return Rank: 4949
Overall Rank
XOMO Sharpe Ratio Rank: 5555
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XOMO Sortino Ratio Rank: 5050
Sortino Ratio Rank
XOMO Omega Ratio Rank: 5050
Omega Ratio Rank
XOMO Calmar Ratio Rank: 5454
Calmar Ratio Rank
XOMO Martin Ratio Rank: 3535
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYLD vs. XOMO - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) and YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TYLDXOMODifference

Sharpe ratio

Return per unit of total volatility

3.14

1.02

+2.11

Sortino ratio

Return per unit of downside risk

4.77

1.40

+3.37

Omega ratio

Gain probability vs. loss probability

2.01

1.20

+0.81

Calmar ratio

Return relative to maximum drawdown

8.09

1.47

+6.62

Martin ratio

Return relative to average drawdown

35.06

3.35

+31.71

TYLD vs. XOMO - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYLD Sharpe Ratio is 3.14, which is higher than the XOMO Sharpe Ratio of 1.02. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYLD and XOMO, offering insights into how both investments have performed under varying market conditions. These values are calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months.


Loading graphics...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TYLDXOMODifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

3.14

1.02

+2.11

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

2.48

0.55

+1.94

Correlation

The correlation between TYLD and XOMO is -0.04. This indicates that the assets' prices tend to move in opposite directions. Negative correlation can be particularly beneficial for diversification and risk management, as one asset may offset the losses of the other during market fluctuations.


Dividends

TYLD vs. XOMO - Dividend Comparison

TYLD's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 4.72%, less than XOMO's 30.57% yield.


TTM202520242023
TYLD
Cambria Tactical Yield ETF
4.72%4.38%4.24%0.00%
XOMO
YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF
30.57%31.64%26.94%5.13%

Drawdowns

TYLD vs. XOMO - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYLD drawdown since its inception was -1.06%, smaller than the maximum XOMO drawdown of -18.90%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYLD and XOMO.


Loading graphics...

Drawdown Indicators


TYLDXOMODifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-1.06%

-18.90%

+17.84%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-0.52%

-15.24%

+14.72%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

0.00%

-5.12%

+5.12%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-0.11%

-7.05%

+6.94%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

0.12%

6.69%

-6.57%

Volatility

TYLD vs. XOMO - Volatility Comparison

The current volatility for Cambria Tactical Yield ETF (TYLD) is 0.24%, while YieldMax XOM Option Income Strategy ETF (XOMO) has a volatility of 6.57%. This indicates that TYLD experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than XOMO based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading graphics...

Volatility by Period


TYLDXOMODifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

0.24%

6.57%

-6.33%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

0.50%

13.81%

-13.31%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

1.34%

22.02%

-20.68%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

1.82%

18.46%

-16.64%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

1.82%

18.46%

-16.64%