PortfoliosLab logoPortfoliosLab logo
TYG vs. XYLD
Performance
Return for Risk
Drawdowns
Volatility
Dividends

Performance

TYG vs. XYLD - Performance Comparison

The chart below illustrates the hypothetical performance of a $10,000 investment in Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). The values are adjusted to include any dividend payments, if applicable.

Loading charts...

Returns By Period

In the year-to-date period, TYG achieves a 12.81% return, which is significantly higher than XYLD's 4.96% return. Over the past 10 years, TYG has underperformed XYLD with an annualized return of -1.19%, while XYLD has yielded a comparatively higher 8.25% annualized return.


TYG

1D
-1.17%
1M
-11.67%
YTD
12.81%
6M
7.85%
1Y
18.81%
3Y*
28.24%
5Y*
19.47%
10Y*
-1.19%

XYLD

1D
-0.15%
1M
2.00%
YTD
4.96%
6M
6.48%
1Y
17.66%
3Y*
11.27%
5Y*
7.72%
10Y*
8.25%
*Multi-year figures are annualized to reflect compound growth (CAGR)

TYG vs. XYLD - Yearly Performance Comparison


2026 (YTD)202520242023202220212020201920182017
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund
12.81%8.46%60.18%-0.37%24.20%46.86%-70.31%1.79%-24.74%3.17%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
4.96%8.02%19.49%11.10%-12.05%19.59%-0.56%21.41%-6.09%16.49%

Correlation

The correlation between TYG and XYLD is 0.13, which is low. Their price movements are largely independent, making them effective diversification partners.


Correlation
Correlation (1Y)
Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.13

Correlation (3Y)
Calculated over the trailing 3-year period

0.31

Correlation (5Y)
Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.40

Correlation (10Y)
Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

0.39

Correlation (All Time)
Calculated using the full available price history since Jun 25, 2013

0.38

Over the past year, the correlation between TYG and XYLD has dropped to 0.13 - well below their long-term average of 0.38, suggesting their price drivers have been diverging.

Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs

Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.


Return for Risk

TYG vs. XYLD — Risk / Return Rank

Compare risk-adjusted metric ranks to identify better-performing investments over the past 12 months.

TYG
TYG Risk / Return Rank: 1515
Overall Rank
TYG Sharpe Ratio Rank: 1313
Sharpe Ratio Rank
TYG Sortino Ratio Rank: 1212
Sortino Ratio Rank
TYG Omega Ratio Rank: 1414
Omega Ratio Rank
TYG Calmar Ratio Rank: 1919
Calmar Ratio Rank
TYG Martin Ratio Rank: 1919
Martin Ratio Rank

XYLD
XYLD Risk / Return Rank: 8282
Overall Rank
XYLD Sharpe Ratio Rank: 8181
Sharpe Ratio Rank
XYLD Sortino Ratio Rank: 8484
Sortino Ratio Rank
XYLD Omega Ratio Rank: 9292
Omega Ratio Rank
XYLD Calmar Ratio Rank: 6666
Calmar Ratio Rank
XYLD Martin Ratio Rank: 8585
Martin Ratio Rank
The rank (0–100) shows how this investment's returns compare to the risk taken. Higher = better. Based on the past 12 months of data, combining Sharpe, Sortino, and other metrics used by quantitative funds and institutional investors.

TYG vs. XYLD - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison

This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.


TYGXYLDDifference
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility

-1.74

Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk

-2.50

Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability

1.19

1.64

-0.45

Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown

1.62

3.35

-1.73

Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown

5.20

17.84

-12.64

TYG vs. XYLD - Sharpe Ratio Comparison

The current TYG Sharpe Ratio is 0.97, which is lower than the XYLD Sharpe Ratio of 2.71. The chart below compares the historical Sharpe Ratios of TYG and XYLD, calculated using daily returns over the previous 12 months. A higher Sharpe Ratio indicates better risk-adjusted performance relative to the risk-free rate.


Loading charts...

Sharpe Ratios by Period


TYGXYLDDifference

Sharpe Ratio (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

0.97

2.71

-1.74

Sharpe Ratio (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period

0.81

0.69

+0.12

Sharpe Ratio (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period

-0.02

0.58

-0.61

Sharpe Ratio (All Time)

Calculated using the full available price history

0.09

0.60

-0.51

Drawdowns

TYG vs. XYLD - Drawdown Comparison

The maximum TYG drawdown since its inception was -95.34%, which is greater than XYLD's maximum drawdown of -33.46%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYG and XYLD.


Loading charts...

Drawdown Indicators


TYGXYLDDifference

Max Drawdown

Largest peak-to-trough decline

-95.34%

-33.46%

-61.88%

Max Drawdown (1Y)

Largest decline over 1 year

-11.67%

-5.29%

-6.38%

Max Drawdown (3Y)

Largest decline over 3 years

-25.08%

-15.53%

-9.55%

Max Drawdown (5Y)

Largest decline over 5 years

-25.08%

-18.66%

-6.42%

Max Drawdown (10Y)

Largest decline over 10 years

-94.98%

-33.46%

-61.52%

Current Drawdown

Current decline from peak

-35.65%

-0.15%

-35.50%

Average Drawdown

Average peak-to-trough decline

-29.42%

-3.72%

-25.70%

Ulcer Index

Depth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks

3.63%

0.99%

+2.64%

Volatility

TYG vs. XYLD - Volatility Comparison

Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) has a higher volatility of 7.20% compared to Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF (XYLD) at 0.88%. This indicates that TYG's price experiences larger fluctuations and is considered to be riskier than XYLD based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.


Loading charts...

Volatility by Period


TYGXYLDDifference

Volatility (1M)

Calculated over the trailing 1-month period

7.20%

0.88%

+6.32%

Volatility (6M)

Calculated over the trailing 6-month period

17.34%

5.37%

+11.97%

Volatility (1Y)

Calculated over the trailing 1-year period

19.45%

6.55%

+12.90%

Volatility (5Y)

Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized

24.06%

11.22%

+12.84%

Volatility (10Y)

Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized

51.16%

14.21%

+36.95%

TYG vs. XYLD - Expense Ratio Comparison

TYG has a 2.90% expense ratio, which is higher than XYLD's 0.60% expense ratio.


Dividends

TYG vs. XYLD - Dividend Comparison

TYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 12.95%, more than XYLD's 10.52% yield.


PositionTTM20252024202320222021202020192018201720162015
TYG
Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund
12.95%11.25%7.96%9.87%8.94%5.27%10.85%14.61%13.17%9.01%8.54%13.95%
XYLD
Global X S&P 500 Covered Call ETF
10.52%10.51%11.54%10.51%13.43%9.07%7.93%5.76%7.12%5.18%3.23%4.65%

Frequently Asked Questions


TYG and XYLD have a correlation of 0.13, meaning they provide meaningful diversification benefit when combined. Depending on your allocation goals, holding both could reduce overall portfolio risk.

TYG has higher volatility (7.20%) compared to XYLD (0.88%). In terms of maximum drawdown, TYG dropped -95.34% vs XYLD's -33.46%.

XYLD currently has the higher Sharpe Ratio (2.71 vs 0.97), meaning it's delivered slightly more return per unit of risk over the trailing 12 months. However, this ranking shifts over time - use the Risk/Return Score above for a more comprehensive view that combines Sharpe, Sortino, and other measures used by quantitative funds.

Portfolio Optimizer

Find the right allocation for TYG and XYLD

Add both to a portfolio and optimize allocations for your target — whether that's maximizing returns, minimizing drawdowns, or balancing risk across holdings.

Open Portfolio Optimizer