TYG vs. CEF
Compare and contrast key facts about Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF).
TYG is an actively managed fund by Tortoise. CEF is an actively managed fund by Sprott. It was launched on Jan 16, 2018.
Performance
TYG vs. CEF - Performance Comparison
Loading graphics...
TYG vs. CEF - Yearly Performance Comparison
| 2026 (YTD) | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund | 16.14% | 8.46% | 60.18% | -0.37% | 24.20% | 46.86% | -70.31% | 1.79% | -24.74% | 3.17% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 5.55% | 92.76% | 24.07% | 6.80% | 1.07% | -8.32% | 31.99% | 16.91% | -6.34% | 18.78% |
Returns By Period
In the year-to-date period, TYG achieves a 16.14% return, which is significantly higher than CEF's 5.55% return. Over the past 10 years, TYG has underperformed CEF with an annualized return of 1.56%, while CEF has yielded a comparatively higher 15.18% annualized return.
TYG
- 1D
- -7.52%
- 1M
- -8.18%
- YTD
- 16.14%
- 6M
- 13.16%
- 1Y
- 18.81%
- 3Y*
- 28.59%
- 5Y*
- 23.81%
- 10Y*
- 1.56%
CEF
- 1D
- 1.30%
- 1M
- -13.66%
- YTD
- 5.55%
- 6M
- 30.90%
- 1Y
- 71.30%
- 3Y*
- 36.73%
- 5Y*
- 22.27%
- 10Y*
- 15.18%
Compare stocks, funds, or ETFs
Search for stocks, ETFs, and funds for a quick comparison or use the comparison tool for more options.
TYG vs. CEF - Expense Ratio Comparison
TYG has a 2.90% expense ratio, which is higher than CEF's 0.48% expense ratio.
Return for Risk
TYG vs. CEF — Risk / Return Rank
TYG
CEF
TYG vs. CEF - Risk-Adjusted Trends Comparison
This table presents a comparison of risk-adjusted performance metrics for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) and Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF). Risk-adjusted metrics are performance indicators that assess an investment's returns in relation to its risk, enabling a more accurate comparison of different investment options.
| TYG | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe ratioReturn per unit of total volatility | 0.80 | 1.92 | -1.12 |
Sortino ratioReturn per unit of downside risk | 1.13 | 2.19 | -1.05 |
Omega ratioGain probability vs. loss probability | 1.18 | 1.35 | -0.17 |
Calmar ratioReturn relative to maximum drawdown | 1.06 | 2.62 | -1.56 |
Martin ratioReturn relative to average drawdown | 4.48 | 9.59 | -5.11 |
Data is calculated on a 1-year rolling basis and updated daily. The trend shows the change in the indicator over the past month. | |||
Loading graphics...
Sharpe Ratios by Period
| TYG | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Sharpe Ratio (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 0.80 | 1.92 | -1.12 |
Sharpe Ratio (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period | 1.00 | 0.94 | +0.06 |
Sharpe Ratio (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period | 0.03 | 0.71 | -0.68 |
Sharpe Ratio (All Time)Calculated using the full available price history | 0.10 | 0.23 | -0.13 |
Correlation
The correlation between TYG and CEF is 0.14, which is considered to be low. This implies their price changes are not closely related. A low correlation is generally favorable for portfolio diversification, as it helps to reduce overall risk by spreading it across multiple assets with different performance patterns.
Dividends
TYG vs. CEF - Dividend Comparison
TYG's dividend yield for the trailing twelve months is around 10.69%, while CEF has not paid dividends to shareholders.
| TTM | 2025 | 2024 | 2023 | 2022 | 2021 | 2020 | 2019 | 2018 | 2017 | 2016 | 2015 | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
TYG Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund | 10.69% | 11.25% | 7.96% | 9.87% | 8.94% | 5.27% | 10.85% | 14.61% | 13.17% | 9.01% | 8.54% | 13.95% |
CEF Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.00% | 0.08% | 0.07% | 0.09% | 0.10% |
Drawdowns
TYG vs. CEF - Drawdown Comparison
The maximum TYG drawdown since its inception was -95.34%, which is greater than CEF's maximum drawdown of -62.29%. Use the drawdown chart below to compare losses from any high point for TYG and CEF.
Loading graphics...
Drawdown Indicators
| TYG | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Max DrawdownLargest peak-to-trough decline | -95.34% | -62.29% | -33.05% |
Max Drawdown (1Y)Largest decline over 1 year | -18.76% | -26.77% | +8.01% |
Max Drawdown (5Y)Largest decline over 5 years | -25.08% | -26.77% | +1.69% |
Max Drawdown (10Y)Largest decline over 10 years | -94.98% | -29.10% | -65.88% |
Current DrawdownCurrent decline from peak | -33.75% | -18.36% | -15.39% |
Average DrawdownAverage peak-to-trough decline | -29.40% | -27.38% | -2.02% |
Ulcer IndexDepth and duration of drawdowns from previous peaks | 4.45% | 7.31% | -2.86% |
Volatility
TYG vs. CEF - Volatility Comparison
The current volatility for Tortoise Energy Infrastructure Closed Fund (TYG) is 10.99%, while Sprott Physical Gold and Silver Trust (CEF) has a volatility of 13.56%. This indicates that TYG experiences smaller price fluctuations and is considered to be less risky than CEF based on this measure. The chart below showcases a comparison of their rolling one-month volatility.
Loading graphics...
Volatility by Period
| TYG | CEF | Difference | |
|---|---|---|---|
Volatility (1M)Calculated over the trailing 1-month period | 10.99% | 13.56% | -2.57% |
Volatility (6M)Calculated over the trailing 6-month period | 15.97% | 35.38% | -19.41% |
Volatility (1Y)Calculated over the trailing 1-year period | 23.68% | 37.38% | -13.70% |
Volatility (5Y)Calculated over the trailing 5-year period, annualized | 23.99% | 23.78% | +0.21% |
Volatility (10Y)Calculated over the trailing 10-year period, annualized | 51.27% | 21.58% | +29.69% |